Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:02:19.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responding to marginalisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Christopher Powell
Affiliation:
Welsh School of Architecture, University of Wales, Cardiff, Bute Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF1 3AP, United Kingdom

Abstract

Some long-term historical, economic and social circumstances leading to marginalisation of the British architectural profession are described. A mismatch between demand for architectural services and their supply is suggested to have contributed to marginalisation. Possible reasons are advanced for a restrained response to marginalisation by the profession. In particular, aspects of the professional culture connected with insularity and aversion to management are suggested to have been significant. However, while aspects of the professional culture hindered long-term adjustment to changing demand, they also may have helped to support design activity in the shorter term.

Type
Practice
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allinson, K. (1993). Wild Card of Design: a Perspective on Architecture in a Project Management Environment, Butterworths, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bowley, M. (1966). British Building Industry: Four Studies in Response and Resistance to Change, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: the Story of Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Economist (1991). 31 08 1991.Google Scholar
Emmitt, S. (forthcoming). ‘Architectural Management in Search of an Advocate’, International Journal of Architectural Management Practice and Research 12.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W. (1988). Creative People: How to Manage Them and Maximise Their Creativity, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Glendinning, M. & Muthesius, S. (1994). Tower Block, Yale University Press, New Haven & London.Google Scholar
Green, S.D. (1996). ‘Metaphorical Analysis of Client Organisations and the Briefing Process’, Construction Management and Economics 14 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutman, R. (1988). Architectural Practice: a Critical View, Princetown Architectural Press, New York.Google Scholar
Harvey, R.C. & Ashworth, A. (1993). Construction Industry of Great Britain, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultures and Organisations, HarperCollins, London.Google Scholar
Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the Team: Joint Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the Construction Industry, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Layton, E. (1961). Building by Local Authorities, Allen & Unwtn, London.Google Scholar
McKean, C. (1994). Value or Cost: Scottish Architectural Practice in the 1990s, RIAS/Rutland Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
RIBA (1962). The Architect and His Office, RIBA, London.Google Scholar
RIBA (1992). Strategic Study of the Profession: Phase 1. Strategic Overview, RIBA, London.Google Scholar
RIBA (1993). Strategic Study of the Profession: Phase 2. Clients and Architects, RIBA, London.Google Scholar
RIBA (1995). Strategic Study of the Profession: Phases 3 & 4. The Way Forward, RIBA, London.Google Scholar
Raelin, J.A. (1991). Clash of Cultures: Managers Managing Professionals, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Saint, A. (1987). Towards a Social Architecture: the Role of School Building in Post-War England, Yale University Press, New Haven & London.Google Scholar
Scott, J.J. (1985). Architectural Practice, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. (1986). Business of Architecture, Collins, London.Google Scholar
Symes, M., Eley, J. & Seidel, A.D. (1995). Architects and Their Practices: a Changing Profession, Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Winch, G. & Schneider, E.Strategic Management of Architectural Practice’, Construction Management and Economics 11 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar