Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:52:08.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Architectural Education of Nomads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Stanislaus Fung
Stanislaus Fung
Affiliation:
Department of ArchitectureThe University of AdelaideAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia 5005
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper deals with issues and possibilities of cross-cultural study in architectural education, especially the teaching of architecture history and theory in schools with students of diverse cultural background. The paper argues that responding to cultural diversity involves not only a more comprehensive curriculum, but also a correlated view of curriculum content, skills, course structure and interdisciplinarity, and a sensitivity towards differences that cannot be accounted for in a universalist frame of reference. Instances of the cultural possibilities offered by the Chinese tradition to contemporary architectural education are given as examples and these are related to a geo-cultural landscape of Chinese communities in which Western schools might exercise a significant role.

Type
Issues
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Winter 1996 , pp. 10 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, R. T. (1993). ‘Introduction’ in Sun-tzu: The Art of War, translated by Ames, R.T.New York, Ballantine, 1993, pp. 52–53.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture, London, Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Bois, Y-A. (1984). ‘A Picturesque Stroll around Clara-Clara’ in October 29, Summer 1984, pp. 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu-joe, H. (Xia Zhujiu) (1993). ‘Yingzao xueshe – Liang Sicheng jianzhushi lunshu gouzao zhi lilun fenxi’ in idem, Kongjian, lishi yu shehui-lunwen xuan 1987–1992. Taiwan shehui jenjiu congkan, no. 3 (Tabei: Zhou Yu, 1993).Google Scholar
Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object, New York, Columbia University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Giroux, H.A. (1991). ‘Border Pedagogy and the Politics of Modernism/Postmodernism’ in Journal of Architectural Education 44, 2 (02, 1991), pp. 69–79.Google Scholar
Hall, D. L. (1991). ‘Modern China and the Postmodern West’ in Culture and Modernity: East-West Philosophic Perspectives, ed. Deutsch, E. Honululu, University of Hawaii Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Kostof, S. (1985). A History of Architecture: Settings and Ritual. New York, Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Leatherbarrow, D. (1986). ‘The Poetics of the Architectural Setting: a Study of the Writings of Edgar Allan Poe’ in Via 8, 1986.Google Scholar
Legault, R. (1991). ‘Architecture and Historical Representation’ in Journal of Architectural Education 44, 4 (08) 1991, pp. 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, E. K. (1970). ‘Landscape Architecture as Modern Other and Postmodern Ground’ in The Culture of Landscape Architecture, ed. Edquist, H. and Bird, V. Melbourne, Edge Publishing in association with the Department of Planning, Policy and Landscape, RMIT, 1994, pp. 12–34.Google Scholar
Rowley, G. (1970). Principles of Chinese Painting, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Schwarzer, M. (1991). ‘Gathered This Unruly Folk: the Textual Colligation of Historical Knowledge on Architecture’ in Journal of Architectural Education 44, 3 (05) 1991, pp. 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei-ming, T. (1994). ‘Cultural China: the Periphery as Center’ in The Living Tree: the Changing Meaning of Being Chinese Today, ed, Wei-ming, T.Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Wright, G. (1990). ‘History for Architects’ in The History of History in American Schools of Architecture, ed. Wright, G. and Parks, J.New York, The Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture and the Princeton Architectural Press, 1990, pp. 13–52.Google Scholar