Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:35:58.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computers, metaphors and change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Richard Coyne
Richard Coyne
Affiliation:
Department of Architectural and Design ScienceUniversity of SydneySydney NSW 2006Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of metaphor provides valuable insights into the workings of technology and how technology brings about change. This paper considers some current influential thinking about metaphor and how this impinges on understandings of technology and design.

Type
Theory
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Autumn 1995 , pp. 62 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akin, O. (1978). How do architects design? in Latombe, J C (ed), Artificial Intelligence and Pattern Recognition in Computer-Aided Design, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp.65–119.Google Scholar
Basalla, G. (1988). The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1979). More about Metaphor, Metaphor and Thought, Ortony, A (ed), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar
Coyne, R. D. and Snodgrass, A. B. (1992). Rescuing CAD from Rationalism, Design Studies Vol.14, No.2, pp.100–123.Google Scholar
Coyne, R. D. and Snodgrass, A. B. (1993). Cooperation and Individualism in Design, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol.20, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
Coyne, R. D., Rosenman, M. A., Radford, A. D., Balachandran, M. and Gero, J. S. (1990). Knowledge-Based Design Systems, Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Coyne, R. D., Snodgrass, A B and Martin, D. (1994). Metaphors in the Design Studio, JAE (Journal of Architectural Education), Vol 48. No.2, pp.113–125.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1982). White mythology: metaphor in the text of philosophy, in Margins of Philosophy, trans. Alan, Bass, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp.207–271.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1972). What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1990). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G. (1976) Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. Linge, D. E., University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. (1986). The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Hawkes, T. (1972). Metaphor, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Heim, M. (1987). Electric Language: A Philosophical Study of Word Processing, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Hesse, , Mary, (1970). Models And Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, , Mary, (1980). The explanatory function of metaphor, in Mary Hesse, Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Harvester Press, Brighton, Sussex, pp.111–124.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. (1987). The evolution of large technological systems, in Bijker, W E, Hughes, T P and Pinch, T (eds) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp.51–82.Google Scholar
Illich, I and Sanders, B. (1988). ABC: the Alphabetisation of the Popular Mind, North Point Press, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy: the Technologising of the Word, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor, trans. Robert, Czerny with Kathleen, McLaughlin and John, Costello, Routledge, and Kegan, Paul, London.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1963). Concept of Mind, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1963). Displacement of Concepts, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Schön, D. (1979). Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem- setting in social policy, in Ortony, , Andrew, (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.254–283.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. and Weaver, W. (1971). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. (1990). Architecture, Time and Eternity, Aditya, Satapitika Series, No. 162, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A. B. and Coyne, R. D. (1992). Models, metaphors and the hermeneutics of designing, Design Issues, Vol.9, No. 7, pp.56–74.Google Scholar
Steadman, P. (1979). The Evolution of Designs: Biological Analogy in Architecture and the Applied Arts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Metaphors of Mind: Conceptions of the Nature of Intelligence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century, Scientific American, Vol.265, No. 3, pp.66–75.Google Scholar
Winograd, T. and Flores, , (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar