Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:36:21.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Architecture, narrative and promenade in Benson + Forsyth's Museum of Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Sophia Psarra
Affiliation:
The Welsh School of ArchitectureBute BuildingKing Edward VII AvenueCardiff CF13NB, UK
Tadeusz Grajewski
Affiliation:
The Welsh School of ArchitectureBute BuildingKing Edward VII AvenueCardiff CF13NB, UK

Abstract

Interaction between the contents and the architecture lies at the heart of the Museum of Scotland's presentation of the story of the land and its people. The design accordingly raises questions concerning the relation between architecture, the viewer and the educational message. Space syntax techniques suggest that this relation is based on a configurational logic combining informality and a clear structure. This study also examines the curatorial interpretation of the collections and demonstrates that the building forms a coherent setting for objects and exhibition themes.

Type
Design
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benedict, M. L. (1979). ‘To Take Hold of Space: Isovist and Isovist Fields’, Environment and Planning B, no. 6, pp. 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, M. L. (1991). Deconstructing the Kimbell: an Essay on Meaning and Architecture, Sites Books, New York.Google Scholar
Eco, U. (1995). Six Walks in the Fictional Woods, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the Machine, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J., (1984). The Social Logic of Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, R.Edinburgh tour de force’ (1999). The Architects' Journal, vol. 8, no. 207, pp. 2635.Google Scholar
Peponis, J. and Hedin, J. (1984). ‘The Layout of Theories in the Natural History Museum’, 9H, no. pp. 2125.Google Scholar