Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:50:51.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whispers from the context of real life

Towards pluriformity in archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Sander E. van der Leeuw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘We live in the dark, we do what we can, the rest is the madness of art.’ (Truman Capote, Music for Chameleons)

‘We must again become a people making our own history. To be able to make our own history is to be able to mould our own future, to build our society that preserves the best of our past and our traditions, while enabling us to grow and develop as a whole people.’ (Robert Andre)

Type
Notes
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 133 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, P.M., Schieve, W.C., and Adams, R.N. (eds), 1987: Modelling complex systems, European journal of operational research 30, 94–221, 223–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, L., 1976: Essays in self-criticism, London.Google Scholar
Althusser, L., and Balibar, E., 1977: Reading capital, London (extracts from the French edition Lire le capital, 1965, Paris).Google Scholar
Arkes, H.R., and Hammond, K.R. (eds), 1987: Judgment and decision making: an interdisciplinary reader, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Augé, M. (ed.), 1974: La construction du monde, Paris.Google Scholar
Bender, B., 1978: Gatherer-hunter to farmer: a social perspective, World archaeology 10, 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1962: Archaeology as anthropology, American antiquity 28, 217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1965: Archaeological systematics and the study of cultural process, American antiquity 31, 203–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1968: Archaeological perspectives, in, Binford, L.R. and Binford, S.R.(eds), New perspectives in archaeology, Chicago, 5–32.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1978: Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1982: Objectivity-explanation-archaeology 1981, in Renfrew, A.C., Rowlands, M.J., and Segraves, B.A. (eds), Theory and explanation in archaeology: the Southampton conference, New York, 1251–138.Google Scholar
Binford, L.R., 1986: In pursuit of the future, in Meltzer, D.J., Fowler, D.D. and Sabloff, J.A. (eds), American archaeology. Past and future. A celebration of the Society for American Archaeology 1935–1985, Washington, 459–479.Google Scholar
Bintliff, J. (ed.), 1991: The ‘Annales School’ and archaeology, Leicester.Google Scholar
Bloemers, J.H.F., and van Dorp, T. (eds), 1991: Pre- en protohistorie van de Lage Landen, Houten.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977: Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge, (original French edition Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique, 1972, Genève).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 1984: The social foundations of prehistoric Britain: themes and variations in the archaeology of power, London.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, M., 1984: Ritual and prestige in the prehistory of Wessex c. 2200-1400 BC: a new dimension to the archaeological evidence, in, Miller, D. and Tilley, C. (eds), Ideology, power and prehistory, Cambridge, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelot, J., Querrien, A. and Schnapp, A., 1979: L'Archéologie en France, les facteurs d'une crise, Le progrès scientifique, 57–110.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1925: The dawn of European civilisation, London.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G., 1936: Man makes himself, London.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D., 1958 2: Archaeology and society, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L., 1968: Analytical archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R., 1956: The idea of history, Oxford.Google Scholar
Conkey, M., 1978: Style and information in cultural evolution: towards a predictive model for the Palaeolithic, in Redman, C., Berman, M., Curtin, E. et al. (eds), Social archaeology: beyond subsistence and dating, New York, 61–86.Google Scholar
Conkey, M., 1982: Boundedness in art and society, in, Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, M., 1985: Mind and matter, Oxford.Google Scholar
Derrida, J., 1974: Of grammatology, Baltimore (original French edition De la grammatologie, Paris, 1967).Google Scholar
Flannery, K.V., 1972: The cultural evolution of civilisations, Annual review of ecology and systematics 3, 399–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K.V., 1973: Archaeology with a capital S, in, Redman, C.L. (ed.), Research and theory in current archaeology, New York, 47–53.Google Scholar
Flannery, K.V., 1982: The Golden Marshalltown: a parable for the archaeology of the 1980s, American anthropologist 84, 265–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, K.V., 1986: Guila Naquitz. Archaic foraging and early agriculture in Oaxaca, Mexico, New York.Google Scholar
Ford, R.I., 1977: Evolutionary ecology and the evolution of human ecosystems: a case study from the Midwestern USA, in Hill, J.N. and Gunn, J. (eds), The individual in prehistory, New York, 153–84.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1974: The order of things, London (original French edition Les mots et les choses, Paris, 1968).Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1980: Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, Gordon, C. (ed.), Hassocks.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., 1981: The history of sexuality, London (original French edition Histoire de la sexualité 1. La volonté du savoir, Paris, 1976)Google Scholar
Frankenstein, S., and Rowlands, M.J., 1978: The internal structure and regional context of Early Iron Age Society in South-Western Germany, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, London 15, 73–112.Google Scholar
Fried, M.H., 1967: The evolution of political society, New York.Google Scholar
Friedman, J., 1974: Marxism, structuralism and vulgar materialism, Man 9, 444–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J., and Rowlands, M.J., 1977: Notes towards an epigenetic model of the evolution of civilisation, in Friedman, J. and Rowlands, M.J. (eds), The evolution of social systems, London, 201–276.Google Scholar
Fritz, J., 1978: Palaeopsychology today: ideational systems and human adaptation in prehistory, in Hill, J.N. and Gunn, J. (eds), The individual in prehistory, New York, 37–60.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G., 1975: Truth and method, London.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., 1976: New rules of sociological method, London.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., 1979: Central problems in social theory, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, A., 1981: The development of social stratification in Bronze Age Europe, Current anthropology 22, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, J., 1988: Chaos. Making a new science, London.Google Scholar
Godelier, M., 1972: Rationality and irrationality in economics, London (original French edition Rationalité et irrationalité en economie, Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Godelier, M., 1977: Perspectives in Marxist anthropology, Cambridge (original French edition Horizons, trajets marxistes en anthropologie, Paris, 1973).Google Scholar
Habermas, J., 1972: Knowledge and human interests, London.Google Scholar
Habermas, J., 1985: Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Härke, H., 1994: Stereotypes and Big Brothers. An Anglo-German perspective on Dutch archaeology, Archaeological dialogues. Dutch perspectives on current issues in archaeology 1, 34–35.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1982a: Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982b: Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982c: Symbols in action, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1986: Reading the past, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1987a: Archaeology as long-term history, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (ed.), 1987b: The archaeology of contextual meanings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1987c: The contribution of the long term, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeology as long-term history, Cambridge, 1–8.Google Scholar
Hodder, , 1990: The domestication of Europe, Oxford.Google Scholar
Huberman, B.A., and Hogg, T., 1988: The behavior of computational ecologies, in Huberman, B.A. (ed.), The ecology of computation, Amsterdam, 77–115.Google Scholar
Jochim, M.A., 1976: Hunter-gatherer subsistence and settlement, New York.Google Scholar
Jochim, M.A., 1982: Strategies for survival, New York.Google Scholar
Knapp, A.B. (ed.), 1992: Archaeology, ‘Annales’, and ethnohistory, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, K., 1981: Economic models for Bronze Age Scandinavia: towards an integrated approach, in Sheridan, A. and Bailey, G. (eds), Economic archaeology: towards and integration of economic and social approaches, Oxford (British archaeological reports, supplementary series 96), 239–303Google Scholar
Kus, S., 1982: Matters material and ideal, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kus, S., 1984: The spirit and its burden: archaeology and symbolic activity, in Spriggs, M. (ed.), Marxist perspectives in archaeology, Cambridge, 101–107.Google Scholar
Latour, B., 1991: Nous n'avons jamais été modernes. Essai d'anthropologie symétrique, Paris.Google Scholar
Leach, E., 1973: Concluding address, in Renfrew, A.C. (ed.), The explanation of culture change, London, 761–71.Google Scholar
Leach, E., 1977: A view from the bridge, in Spriggs, M. (ed.), Archaeology and anthropology: areas of mutual interest, Oxford (British archaeological reports, supplementary series 19), 161–176.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., 1982: How objective can we become? Some reflections on the relationship between the archaeologist, his data and his interpretations, in Renfrew, A.C., Rowlands, M.J. and Segraves, B.A. (eds), Theory and explanation in archaeology: the Southampton conference, New York, 431–457.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, S.E., 1984: Dust to dust. A transformational view of the ceramic cycle, in van der Leeuw, S.E. and Pritchard, A.C. (eds), The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, Amsterdam, 707–778.Google Scholar
Lefébure, C., 1978: Linguistique et technologie culturelle: l'exemple du métier à tisser berbère, Techniques et culture 3, 84–148.Google Scholar
Lemonnier, P., 1986: The study of material culture today: towards an anthropology of technical systems, Journal of anthropological archaeology 5, 147–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemonnier, P. (ed.), 1993: Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic, London.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1965: Préhistoire de l'art occidental, Paris.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1964: Totemism, London (original French edition Le totémisme aujourd'hui, Paris, 1962)Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C., 1968: Structural anthropology, London (original French edition Anthropologie structurale, Paris, 1958).Google Scholar
Louwe Kooijmans, L.P., 1994: Another participant's view of Dutch archaeology in post-war times, Archaeological dialogues. Dutch perspectives on current issues in archaeology 1, 38–45.Google Scholar
McGlade, J.M., and Allen, P.M., 1985: The fishery industry as a complex system, in Mahon, R. (ed.), Towards the inclusion of fishery interactions in management advice, 209–216.Google Scholar
McGlade, J., and McGlade, J.M., 1989: Modelling the innovative component of social change, in van der Leeuw, S.E. and Torrence, R. (eds), What's new? A closer look at the process of innovation, London, 281–299.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, C., 1972: From production to reproduction, Economy and society 1, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillassoux, C., 1981: Maidens, meal and money, Cambridge (original French edition Femmes, greniers et capitaux, Paris, 1975).Google Scholar
Miller, D., 1982: Artefacts as products of human categorisation, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., 1985: Artefacts as categories, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Miller, D., and Tilley, C., 1984a: Ideology, power and prehistory: an introduction, in Miller, D. and Tilley, C., (eds), Ideology, power and prehistory, Cambridge, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D., and Tilley, C. (eds), 1984b: Ideology, power and prehistory, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S.J., 1990: Thoughtful foragers: a study in prehistoric decision making, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monod, J., 1970: Le hasard et la nécessité, Paris.Google Scholar
Morin, E., 1977: La méthode, 2, Paris.Google Scholar
Muller, J., 1977: Individual variation in art styles, in Hill, J. and Gunn, J. (eds), The individual in prehistory, New York, 23–40.Google Scholar
Olsson, G., 1980: Eggs in bird/Birds in egg, London.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1982: Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1984: Economic and ideological change: cyclical growth in the pre-state societies of Jutland, in Miller, D. and Tilley, C. (eds), Ideology, power and prehistory, Cambridge, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., 1972: The principles of genetic epistemology, London (original French edition Introduction à l' épistémologie génétique, Paris, 1950).Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1965: Ancient Europe, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Plog, F., 1969: An approach to the study of prehistoric change, Chicago (unpublished PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Plog, F., 1977: Explaining change, in Hill, J.N., Explanation of prehistoric change, Albuquerque, 17–58.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I., 1978: Time, structure and fluctuations, Science 201, 777–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prigogine, I., 1980: From being to becoming, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Pritchard, A.C., and van der Leeuw, S.E., 1984: Introduction: The many dimensions of pottery, in van der Leeuw, S.E. and Pritchard, A.C. (eds), The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology, Amsterdam, 3–23.Google Scholar
Redman, C., Berman, M., Curtin, E., et al. (eds), 1978: Social archaeology: beyond subsistence and dating, New York.Google Scholar
Regt, H.C.D.G. de, 1994: The history of European archaeology as evidence for a philosophy of science?, Archaeological dialogues. Dutch perspectives on current issues in archaeology 1, 46–48.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A.C., and Cooke, K. (eds), 1979: Transformations. mathematical approaches to culture change, New York.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A.C., Rowlands, M.J. and Segraves, B.A. (eds), 1982: Theory and explanation in archaeology: the Southampton conference, New York.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P., 1981: Hermeneutics and the social sciences, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M.J., 1984: Objectivity and subjectivity in archaeology, in Spriggs, M. (ed.), Marxist perspectives in archaeology, Cambridge, 108–114.Google Scholar
Salmon, M.H., 1982a: Philosophy and archaeology, New York.Google Scholar
Salmon, M.H., 1982b: Models of explanation: two views, in Renfrew, A.C., Rowlands, M.J. and Segraves, B.A. (eds), Theory and explanation in archaeology: the Southampton conference, New York, 35–44.Google Scholar
Salmon, W.C., 1982: Causality in archaeological explanation, in Renfrew, A.C., Rowlands, M.J. and Segraves, B.A. (eds), Theory and explanation in archaeology: the Southampton conference, New York, 45–56.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M.D., and Service, E.R. (eds), 1960: Evolution and culture, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, J. de, 1960: Course in general linguistics, London (original French edition Cours de linguistique générale, Genève, 1915).Google Scholar
Schwartz, D.W, 1978: A conceptual framework for the sociology of archaeology, in Dunnell, R.C. and Hall, E.S. (eds), Archaeological essays in honor of Irving B. Rouse, The Hague, 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, E.R., 1962: Primitive social organisation: an evolutionary perspective, New York.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C., 1987a: Re-constructing archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., and Tilley, C., 1987b: Social theory and archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Slofstra, J., 1994: Recent developments in Dutch archaeology. A scientific-historical outline, Archaeological Dialogues. Dutch perspectives on current issues in archaeology 1, 9–33.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, A., 1991: Structural history and classical Greek archaeology, in Bintliff, J.(ed.), The ‘Annales School’ and archaeology, Leicester, (57–72).Google Scholar
Soustelle, J., 1975: La recherche française en archéologie et anthropologie, Paris.Google Scholar
Spriggs, M. (ed.), 1984: Marxist perspectives in archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Springer, S.P., and Deutsch, G., 1981: Left brain, Right brain, New York.Google Scholar
Terray, E., 1972: Marxism and ‘primitive societies’, New York (original French edition Le marxisme devant les sociétés primitives, Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1987: Discontinuity, genealogy and change in prehistory (paper presented at the 9th annual TAG Conference,Bradford,United Kingdom,16 December 1987).Google Scholar
Tilley, C., 1982: Social formation, social structures and social change, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C., 1984: Ideology and the legitimation of power in the middle Neolithic of southern Sweden, in Miller, D. and Tilley, C. (eds), Ideology, power and prehistory, Cambridge, 111–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C., 1991: Material culture and text. The art of ambiguity, London and New York.Google Scholar
Touraine, A., 1977: The self-production of society, Chicago.Google Scholar
Turing, A.M., 1952: The chemical basis of morphogenesis, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B, 237, 5–72.Google Scholar
Washburn, D. (ed.), 1983: Structure and cognition in art, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Watson, P.J., LeBlanc, S. and Redman, C., 1972: Explanation in archaeology: an explicitly scientific approach, New York.Google Scholar
Wylie, A., 1982: Epistemological issues raised by a structuralist archaeology, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadeh, L.A., 1975: Calculus of fuzzy restrictions, in Zadeh, L.A. et al. (eds) Fuzzy sets and their applications to cognitive and decision processes, New York, 1–39.Google Scholar