Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:05:22.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2012

Duncan Garrow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , December 2012 , pp. 133 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albarella, U., andSerjeantson, D., 2002: A passion for pork. Butchery and cooking at the British Neolithic site of Durrington Walls, in Miracle, P. andMilner, N. (eds), Consuming passions and patterns of consumption, Cambridge, 33–49.Google Scholar
Barrett, J., 1988: Fields of discourse. Reconstituting a social archaeology, Critique of anthropology 7, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.,Bradley, R. andGreen, M., 1991: Landscape, monuments and society, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadsmoore, E.,Garrow, D. andKnight, M., 2010: Re-fitting Etton. Space, time and material culture within a causewayed enclosure in Cambridgeshire, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 76, 115–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, C., 1992: Ritual theory, ritual practice, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bell, C., 1997: Ritual. Perspectives and dimensions, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berggren, Å., 2006: Archaeology and sacrifice. A discussion of interpretations, in Andrén, A.,Jennbert, K. andRaudvere, C. (eds), Old Norse religion in long-term perspectives. Origins, changes and interactions, Lund, 303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berggren, Å., 2010: Med kärret som källa. Om begreppen offer och ritual inom arkeologin, Lund.Google Scholar
Berggren, Å., andCelin, U., 2004: Öresundsförbindelsen. Burlöv 20C, Malmö (Rapport 2136 över arkeologisk slutundersökning, 36).Google Scholar
Berggren, Å., andNilsson Stutz, L., 2010: From spectator to critic and participant. A new role for archaeology in ritual studies, Journal of social archaeology 10, 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, R.R.,Church, M.J. andRowley-Conwy, P., 2009: Cereals, fruits and nuts in the Scottish Neolithic, Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 139, 47–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, M., 1995: Questions not to ask of Malagasy carvings, in Hodder, I.,Shanks, M.,Alexandri, A.,Büchli, V.,Carman, J.,Last, J. andLucas, G. (eds), Interpreting archaeology. Finding meaning in the past, London and New York, 212–15.Google Scholar
Bognár-Kutzian, I., 1963: The Copper Age cemetery of Tiszapolgár-Basatanya, Budapest (Archaeologia Hungarica 42, Akadémiai Kiadó).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P., 1977: Outline of a theory of practice, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 1975: Maumbury Rings, Dorchester. The excavations of 1908–1913, Archaeologia 105, 1–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 1984: Regional systems in Neolithic Britain, in Bradley, R. andGardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic studies. A review of some current research, Oxford, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R., 1990: The passage of arms. An archaeological analysis of prehistoric hoards and votive deposits, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2000: An archaeology of natural places, London.Google Scholar
Bradley, R., 2005: Ritual and domestic life in prehistoric Europe, London.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, M., 1984: Ritual and prestige in the prehistory of Wessex c.2200–1400 BC. A new dimension to the archaeological evidence, in Miller, D. andTilley, C. (eds), Ideology, power and prehistory, Cambridge, 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittain, M., andHarris, O., 2010: Enchaining arguments and fragmenting assumptions. Reconsidering the fragmentation debate in archaeology, World archaeology 42 (4), 581–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A., 1991: Structured deposition and technological change among the flaked stone artefacts from Cranborne Chase, in Barrett, J.,Bradley, R. andHall, M. (eds), Papers on the prehistoric archaeology of Cranborne Chase, Oxford, 101–33.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 1995: A place for the dead. The role of human remains in Late Bronze Age Britain, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61, 245–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J., 1999a: Houses, lifecycles and deposition on Middle Bronze Age settlements in southern England, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 65, 245–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brück, J., 1999b: Ritual and rationality. Some problems of interpretation in European archaeology, European journal of archaeology 2 (3), 313–44.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 1999c: What's in a settlement? Domestic practice and residential mobility in Early Bronze Age southern England, in Brück, J. andGoodman, M. (eds), Making places in the prehistoric world. Themes in settlement archaeology, London, 52–75.Google Scholar
Brück, J., 2006: Fragmentation, personhood and the social construction of technology in Middle and Late Bronze Age Britain, Cambridge archaeological journal 16, 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudenell, M., andCooper, A., 2008: Post-middenism. Depositional histories on Later Bronze Age settlements at Broom, Bedfordshire, Oxford journal of archaeology 27, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burl, A., 1987: The Stonehenge people, London.Google Scholar
Case, H., 1973: A ritual site in north-east Ireland, in Daniel, G. andKjaerum, P. (eds), Megalithic graves and ritual, Copenhagen, 173–96.Google Scholar
Chapman, J., 2000: Pit-digging and structured deposition in Neolithic and Copper Age of central and eastern Europe, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J., andGaydarska, B., 2006: Parts and wholes. Fragmentation in prehistoric context, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clarke, D., 1972: A provisional model of an Iron Age society and its settlement system, in Clarke, D. (ed.), Models in archaeology, London, 801–85.Google Scholar
Clarke, S., 1997: Abandonment, rubbish disposal and special deposits at Newstead, in Meadows, K.,Lemke, C. andHeron, J. (eds), TRAC 96: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference 1996, Oxford, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleal, R., 1984: The Later Neolithic in eastern England, in Bradley, R. andGardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic studies. A review of some current research, Oxford, 135–59.Google Scholar
Cooper, A., in press: Pursuing the ‘pressure of the past’. British prehistoric research 1980–2010, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 78.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B., 1983: Danebury. Anatomy of an Iron Age hillfort, London.Google Scholar
Darvill, T., 2008: The concise Oxford dictionary of archaeology, Oxford, Oxford Reference Online, accessed 13 April 2011.Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, V., 1965: Les principaux résultats de deux premières campagnes de fouilles dans la station néolithique récente de Căscioarele, Studii şi Cercetări Istorii Veche şi Arheologie 16 (2), 215–237.Google Scholar
Eriksson, N.,Rogius, K.,Rosendahl, A. andWennberg, T., 2000: Fyndrika TN-gropar. Student paper, Department of Archaeology, Lund University.Google Scholar
Evans, C., 1988: Monuments and analogy. The interpretation of causewayed enclosures, in Burgess, C.,Topping, P.,Mordant, C. andMaddison, M. (eds), Enclosures and defences in the Neolithic of western Europe, Oxford, 47–73.Google Scholar
Field, N.,Matthews, C. andSmith, I., 1964: New Neolithic sites in Dorset and Bedfordshire, with a note on the distribution of Neolithic storage pits in Britain, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 30, 352–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, A., 1997: Everyday life in Iron Age Wessex, in Gwilt, A. and Haselgrove, C. (eds), Reconstructing Iron Age societies, Oxford, 73–86.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., 2006: Post-processual landscape archaeology. A critique, Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16, 267–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fokkens, H.,Jansen, R. andvan Wijk, I.M. (eds), 2009: Het grafveld Oss-Zevenbergen. Een prehistorisch grafveld ontleed, Leiden (Archol Rapport 50).Google Scholar
Fontijn, D.R., 2002: Sacrificial landscapes. Cultural biographies of persons, objects and ‘natural’ places in the Bronze Age of the southern Netherlands, c.2300–600BC, Leiden (Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 33–34).Google Scholar
Fontijn, D.R., andJansen, R. (eds), forthcoming: The seventh mound. An Early Iron Age Hallstatt ‘chieftain's’ grave in the barrow landscape of Oss-Zevenbergen, Leiden.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., 2004: The archaeology of personhood. An anthropological approach, London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, D., 2006: Pits, settlement and deposition during the Neolithic and Early Bronze Age in East Anglia, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, D.,Beadsmoore, E. andKnight, M., 2005: Pit clusters and the temporality of occupation. An earlier Neolithic pit site at Kilverstone, Thetford, Norfolk, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 71, 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrow, D.,Lucy, S. andGibson, D., 2006: Excavations at Kilverstone, Norfolk 2000–02. An episodic landscape history, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giddens, A., 1984: The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gidlöf, K., 2009: En tidigneolitisk samlingsplats – fyndrika gropar och långhögar på Almhov, in Hadevik, C. andSteineke, M. (eds), Tematisk rapportering av Citytunnelprojektet, Malmö (Rapport 48), 91–136.Google Scholar
Gidlöf, K.,Hammarstrand Dehman, K. andJohansson, T., 2006: Almhov – delområde 1, Malmö (Citytunnelprojektet, Rapport över arkeologisk slutundersökning, Rapport 39).Google Scholar
Gonzales, A.B. (in prep.) Deliberate fragmentation in Iberian prehistory.Google Scholar
Grant, A., 1984: Ritual behaviour. The special bone deposits, in Cunliffe, B. (ed.), Danebury. An Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire, Vol. 2, The excavations 1969–1978. The finds, London, 533–43.Google Scholar
Greene, K., andMoore, T., 2010: Archaeology. An introduction, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grøn, O., 2003: Mesolithic dwelling places in south Scandinavia. Their definition and social interpretation, Antiquity 77, 685–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guttman, E., andLast, J., 2000: A Late Bronze Age landscape at South Hornchurch, Essex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 66, 319–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwilt, A., 1997: Popular practices from material culture. A case study of the Iron Age settlements at Wakerley, in Gwilt, A. andHaselgrove, C. (eds), Reconstructing Iron Age societies, Oxford, 153–66.Google Scholar
Hadevik, C., 2009: Trattbägarkulturen i Malmöområdet, in Hadevik, C. andSteineke, M. (eds), Tematisk rapportering av Citytunnel-projektet, Malmö (Rapport 48), 13–90.Google Scholar
Hansen, S., 1994: Studien zu den Metalldeponierungen während der älteren Urnenfelderzeit zwischen Rhônetal und Karpatenbecken, Bonn.Google Scholar
Hansen, S., 1996–98: Migration und Kommunikation während der späten Bronzezeit. Die Depots als Quelle für ihren Nachweis, Dacia NS 40–42(2000), 5–28.Google Scholar
Hansen, S., 2005: Über bronzezeitliche Horte in Ungarn. Horte als soziale Praxis, in Horejs, B.et al. (eds), Interpretationsraum Bronzezeit. Bernhard Hänsel von seinen Schülern gewidmet, Bonn, 211–30.Google Scholar
Harding, J., 2006: Pit digging, occupation and structured deposition on Rudston Wold, eastern Yorkshire, Oxford journal of archaeology 25, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, O., 2005: Agents of identity. Performative practice at the Etton causewayed enclosure, in Hofmann, D.,Mills, J. andCochrane, A. (eds), Elements of being. Identities, mentalities and movements, Oxford (BAR International Series 1437), 40–9.Google Scholar
Harris, O., 2009: Making places matter in Early Neolithic Dorset. Oxford journal of archaeology 28, 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, O., 2010: Emotional and mnemonic geographies at Hambledon Hill. Texturing Neolithic places with bodies and bones, Cambridge archaeological journal 20, 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haşotti, P., 1985: Noi cercetări arheologice în aşezarea culturii Hamangia de la Medgidia–‘Cocoaşe’, Pontica 18, 25–40.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M., 1962: Being and time (tr. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson), Oxford.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D., 1989: Re-thinking the Iron Age, Scottish archaeological review 6, 16–24.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D., 1994: Why we should not take the data from Iron Age settlements for granted. Recent studies of intra-site patterning, in Fitzpatrick, A. andMorris, E. (eds), The Iron Age in Wessex. Recent work, Salisbury, 4–8.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D., 1995: Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex. A study on the formation of a specific archaeological record, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J.N., 1968: Broken K Pueblo. Patterns of form and function, in Binford, S.R. andBinford, L.R. (eds), New perspectives in archaeology, Chicago, 103–42.Google Scholar
Hingley, R., 1990: Domestic organisation and gender relations in Iron Age and Romano-British households, in Samson, R. (ed.), The archaeology of houses, Edinburgh, 125–47.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982a: Symbols in action. Ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1982b: Theoretical archaeology. A reactionary view, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 1986: Reading the past, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1989: This is not an article about material culture as text, Journal of anthropological archaeology 8, 250–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I., 2007: Looking back at symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge archaeological journal 17, 199–203.Google Scholar
Jones, A., 1998: Where eagles dare. Landscape, animals and the Neolithic of Orkney, Journal of material culture 3, 301–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, H., andTouminen, K., 2006: Arkeologisk slutundersökning Svågertorps industriområde, delområde K, P and S, Malmö (Rapport 80).Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I., 1986: The cultural biography of things. Commoditisation as process, in Appadurai, A. (ed.), The social life of things, Cambridge, 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Küchler, S., 1988: Malangan. Objects, sacrifice and the production of memory, American ethnologist 15 (4), 625–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
H. Kyrieleis, H., 2006: Anfänge und Frühzeit des Heiligtums von Olympia. Die Ausgrabungen am Pelopion 1987–1996, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Lamdin-Whymark, H., 2008: The residue of ritualised action. Neolithic deposition practices in the Middle Thames Valley, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, M., andParker, M. Pearson, 2007: From Stonehenge to the Baltic. Living with cultural diversity in the 3rd millennium BC, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, G., 1980: Day of shining red. An essay on understanding ritual, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, G., 2001: Critical approaches to fieldwork, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, J.I., 1997: Bronze Age ‘barrows’ and funerary rites and rituals of cremation, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 63, 129–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, R., andHealy, F., 2008: Hambledon Hill, Dorset, England. Excavation and survey of a Neolithic monument complex and its surrounding landscape, London.Google Scholar
Moore, H., 1981: Bone refuse. Possibilities for the future, in Sheridan, A. andBailey, G. (eds), Economic archaeology, Oxford, 87–94.Google Scholar
Moore, H., 1982: The interpretation of spatial patterning in settlement residues, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H., 1986: Space, text and gender. An anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nebelsick, L., 2000: Rent asunder. Ritual violence in Late Bronze Age hoards, in Pare, C. (ed.), Metals make the world go round. The supply and circulation of metals in Bronze Age Europe, Oxford, 159–75.Google Scholar
Needham, S., 1992: The structure of settlement and ritual in the Late Bronze Age of south-east Britain, in Mordant, C. andRichard, A. (eds), L'habitat et l'occupation du sol à l'age du bronze en Europe, Paris, 49–69.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., 1996: Food, fertility and front doors in the first millennium BC, in Champion, T. andCollis, J. (eds), The Iron Age in Britain and Ireland. Recent trends, Sheffield, 117–32.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., andRichards, C., 1994: Architecture and order. Spatial representation and archaeology, in Parker Pearson, M. andRichards, C. (eds), Architecture and order. Approaches to social space, London, 38–72.Google Scholar
Pearce, M., 2008: Structured deposition in Early Neolithic northern Italy, Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 21, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J., 1992: The Sanctuary, Overton Hill, Wiltshire. A reassessment, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 58, 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J., 1995: Inscribing space. Formal deposition at the later Neolithic monument of Woodhenge, Wiltshire, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 61, 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J., 1999: ‘These places have their moments’. Thoughts on settlement practices in the British Neolithic, in Brück, J. andGoodman, M. (eds), Making places in the prehistoric world. Themes in settlement archaeology, London, 76–93.Google Scholar
Pollard, J., 2001: The aesthetics of depositional practice, World archaeology 33, 315–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J., 2008: Deposition and material agency in the Early Neolithic of southern Britain, in Mills, B.J. andWalker, W.H. (eds), Memory work. Archaeologies of material practices, Santa Fe, 41–59.Google Scholar
Pollard, J., andRobinson, D., 2007: A return to Woodhenge. The results and implications of the 2006 excavations, in Larsson, L. andParker Pearson, M. (eds), From Stonehenge to the Baltic. Living with cultural diversity in the third millennium BC, Oxford, 159–68.Google Scholar
Pollard, J., andRuggles, C., 2001: Shifting perceptions. Spatial order, cosmology, and patterns of deposition at Stonehenge, Cambridge archaeological journal 11 (1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, R., 2007: Ritual and the roundhouse. A critique of recent ideas on the use of domestic space in later British prehistory, in Haselgrove, C. andPope, R. (eds), The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the near continent, Oxford, 204–28.Google Scholar
Pryor, F., 1998: Etton. Excavations of a Neolithic causewayed enclosure near Maxey, Cambridgeshire, 1982–7, London.Google Scholar
Pryor, F.,French, C. andTaylor, M., 1985: An interim report on excavations at Etton, Maxey, Cambridgeshire, 1982–1984, Antiquaries journal 65, 275–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, C., andThomas, J., 1984: Ritual activity and structured deposition in Later Neolithic Wessex, in Bradley, R. andGardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic studies. A review of some current research, Oxford, 189–218.Google Scholar
Rudebeck, E., 2010: I trästodernas skugga – monumentala möten i neolitiseringens tid, in Nilsson, B. andRudebeck, E. (eds), Arkeologiska och förhistoriska världar. Fält, erfarenheter och stenåldersplatser i sydvästra Skåne, Malmö, 83–252.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M., 2010: Behavioral archaeology. Principles and practice, London.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., andTilley, C., 1982: Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication. A reinterpretation of Neolithic mortuary practices, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Symbolic and structural archaeology, Cambridge, 129–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, M., andTilley, C., 1987a: Re-constructing archaeology. Theory and practice, London.Google Scholar
Shanks, M., andTilley, C., 1987b: Social theory and archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sherratt, S., 2012: The intercultural transformative capacities or irregularly appropriated goods, in Maran, J. andStockhammer, P. (eds), Materiality and social practice. Transformative capacities of intercultural encounters, Oxford, 152–72.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, C., 1994: Gerätegeld Sichel. Studien zur monetären Struktur bronzezeitlicher Horte im nördlichen Mitteleuropa, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stålbom, U., 1997: Waste of what? Rubbish pits or ceremonial deposits at the Pryssgården site in the Late Bronze Age, Lund archaeological review, 21–35.Google Scholar
Stiftelsen Kulturmiljövård, 2011: Heads on stakes. Unique Stone Age finds at Kanaljorden, Motala, Sweden, press release dated 19 September 2011, available at www.kmmd.se/Kanaljorden-Motala/pressrelease—Heads-on-Stakes, accessed 13 January 2012.Google Scholar
Stone, J., andYoung, W., 1948: Two pits of Grooved Ware date near Woodhenge, Wiltshire archaeological magazine 52, 287–306.Google Scholar
Strathern, M., 1988: The gender of the gift, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1984: A tale of two polities. Kinship, authority and exchange in the Neolithic of south Dorset and north Wiltshire, in Bradley, R. andGardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic studies. A review of some current research, Oxford, 161–76.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1991: Rethinking the Neolithic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1996: Time, culture and identity, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 1999: Understanding the Neolithic, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2007: The internal features at Durrington Walls. Investigations in the Southern Circle and Western Enclosures 2005–6, in Larsson, L. andParker Pearson, M. (eds), From Stonehenge to the Baltic. Living with cultural diversity in the third millennium BC, Oxford, 145–57.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., 2011: Ritual and religion in the Neolithic, in Insoll, T. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of ritual and religion, Oxford, 371–86.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., andWhittle, A., 1986: Anatomy of a tomb. West Kennet revisited, Oxford journal of archaeology 5, 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, J., andRichards, C., 1984: The decline of ritual authority and the introduction of beakers into Britain, in Bradley, R. andGardiner, J. (eds), Neolithic studies. A review of some current research, Oxford, 67–84.Google Scholar
Touminen, K., andKoch, H., 2007: Arkeologisk slutundersökning Svågertorps industriområde, delområde M, N, O, Q and R, Malmö (Rapport 18).Google Scholar
Trigger, B., 2006: A history of archaeological thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, G., andLongworth, I., 1971: Durrington Walls. Excavations 1966–1968, Dorking.Google Scholar
Walker, L., 1984: The deposition of the human remains, in Cunliffe Danebury, B., An Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire, Vol. 2, The excavations 1969–1978. The finds, London, 442–63.Google Scholar
Walker, W., 1995: Ceremonial trash? in Skibo, J.,Walker, W. andNielsen, A (eds), Expanding archaeology, Salt Lake City, 67–79.Google Scholar
Webley, L., 2007: Using and abandoning roundhouses. A reinterpretation of the evidence from Late Bronze Age–Early Iron Age southern England, Oxford journal of archaeology 26, 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A., 1997: Moving on and moving around. Neolithic settlement mobility, in Topping, P. (ed.), Neolithic landscapes, Oxford, 15–22.Google Scholar
Whittle, A.,Pollard, J. andGrigson, C., 1999: The harmony of symbols. The Windmill Hill causewayed enclosure, Wiltshire, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, G., 1999: Funde aus Viereckschanzen – Kleinfunde, Geräte, Keramik, in Wieland, G. (ed.), Keltische Viereckschanzen. Einem Rätsel auf der Spur, Stuttgart, 54–61.Google Scholar
Woodward, A., 2002: Beads and beakers. Heirlooms and relics in the British Early Bronze Age, Antiquity 76, 1040–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, A., andHughes, G., 2007: Deposits and doorways. Patterns within the Iron Age settlement at Crick Covert Farm, Northamptonshire, in Haselgrove, C. andPope, R. (eds), The Earlier Iron Age in Britain and the near continent, Oxford, 185–203.Google Scholar
Yates, D., andBradley, R., 2010: Still water, hidden depths. The deposition of Bronze Age metalwork in the English fenland, Antiquity 84, 405–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar