Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T20:28:36.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intransigent archaeology. An interview with Evžen Neustupný on his life in archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2012

Martin Kuna
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An interview with Evžen Neustupný opens up a range of issues regarding the theory and history of archaeology and its development in Central Europe. His view of the discipline differs in many ways from that of current global trends. His ‘artefact archaeology’ inverts the concept of adaptation and highlights the role of artefacts in the creation of the human world. The interview also shows that post-war archaeology even to the east of the Iron Curtain followed the trajectory from culture-history paradigm to processualism and onwards. It also testifies to the situation in the social sciences under the Communist regime and the ambiguous role of Marxist philosophy.

Keywords

archaeological paradigmsprocessual archaeologyhistory of archaeologyCzech Republic
Type
Interview
Information
Archaeological Dialogues , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , June 2012 , pp. 3 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References – selected works of Evžen Neustupný

1956: K relativní chronologii volutové keramiky – A la chronologie relative de la céramique spiralée, Archeologické rozhledy 8, 373, 386–407, 453–55, 461–62.Google Scholar
1959: Zur Entstehung der Kultur mit kannelierter Keramik, Slovenská archeológia 7, 260–84.Google Scholar
1960 (with J. Neustupný): Nástin pravěkých dějin Československa (Outline of prehistory of Czechoslovakia), Sborník Národního muzea v Praze 14, 95–221.Google Scholar
1961 (with J. Neustupný): Czechoslovakia before the Slavs, London and New York.Google Scholar
1967a (with V. Bucha): Changes of the Earth's magnetic field and radiocarbon dating, Nature 215, 261–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1967b: K počátkům patriarchátu ve střední Evropě – The beginnings of patriarchy in Central Europe, Prague (Rozpravy ČSAV 77/2).Google Scholar
1968: Absolute chronology of the Neolithic and Eneolithic periods in Central and South-Eastern Europe. Slovenská archeológia 16, 19–60.Google Scholar
1969: Absolute chronology of the Neolithic and Eneolithic periods in Central and South-East Europe II, Archeologické rozhledy 21, 783–810.Google Scholar
1970a: The accuracy of radiocarbon dating, in Olsson, I.U. (ed.), Nobel symposium 12, Stockholm, 23–34.Google Scholar
1970b: A new epoch in radiocarbon dating, Antiquity 44, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1970c: Radiocarbon chronology of Central Europe from c. 6450 BP to c. 3750 BP, in Olsson, I.U. (ed.), Nobel symposium 12, Stockholm, 105–8.Google Scholar
1971: Whither archaeology?, Antiquity 45, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973: Factors determining the variability of the Corded Ware culture, in Renfrew, C. (ed.), The explanation of culture change, London, 725–30.Google Scholar
1976a: The Bell Beaker culture in East Central Europe, in IX Congrès international des sciences préhistoriques et protohistoriques, Nice, 112–31.Google Scholar
1976b: Paradigm lost, in Glockenbechersymposium Oberried 1974, Bussum-Haarlem, 241–48.Google Scholar
1981: Zachování kostí z pravěkých sídlišť – Destruction of bones in prehistoric sites, Archeologické rozhledy 33 (2), 154–65.Google Scholar
1982: Prehistoric migrations by infiltration, Archeologické rozhledy 34, 278–93.Google Scholar
1983a: The demography of prehistoric cemeteries, Památky archeologické 76, 7–34.Google Scholar
1983b (with Z. Dvořák): Výživa pravěkých zemědělců: model – Nutrition of prehistoric farmers. A model, Památky archeologické 74, 224–57.Google Scholar
1991a: Community areas of prehistoric farmers in Bohemia, Antiquity 65, 326–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991b: Recent theoretical achievements of prehistoric archaeology in Czechoslovakia, in Hodder, I. (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe. The last three decades, London, 248–71.Google Scholar
1993a: Archaeological method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1993b: Czechoslovakia: the last three years, Antiquity 67, 129–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994: Settlement area theory in Bohemian archaeology. Památky archeologické – Supplementum 1, 248–58.Google Scholar
1995: The significance of facts. Journal of European archaeology 3 (1), 189–212.Google Scholar
1996a: Polygons in archaelogy, Památky archeologické 87, 112–36.Google Scholar
1996b: On prehistoric warfare, Journal of European archaeology 4, 367–73.Google Scholar
1998a: Mainstreams and minorities in archaeology, Archeologia Polona 35–36, 13–23.Google Scholar
1998b: Otherness in prehistoric times, in Larsson, L., The world view of prehistoric man, Lund, 65–71.Google Scholar
1998c (ed.): Space in prehistoric Bohemia, Prague.Google Scholar
2007: Metoda archeologie – Method of archaeology, Pilsen.Google Scholar
2008 (ed.): Archeologie pravěkých Čech 4. Eneolit (Archaeology of prehistoric Bohemia 4. Eneolithic), Prague.Google Scholar
2010: Teorie archeologie – Theory of archaeology, Pilsen.Google Scholar