Article contents
IV.—The Northfleet 50-foot Submergence later than the Coombe Rock of post-Early Mousterian times
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2011
Extract
Researches conducted during the past twenty years have definitely succeeded in establishing the sequence, both archaeological and geological, of the Boyn Hill or ‘100-foot’ terrace of the Lower Thames. The culture-stages there represented are set out hereunder in ascending order, beginning with the oldest:
(1) Clactonian 1; these specimens, many of which are striated, have been derived from some earlier deposit not yet located :
(2) Clactonian 2 and 3 :
(3) Acheulian :
(4) Early Mousterian (Levalloisian A of mid-Pleistocene times).
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1933
References
page 67 note 1 Chandler, R. H., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1929, vol. vi, pt. 2, pp. 79–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 67 note 2 Ibid.,Cook, W. H. and Killick, J. R.Google Scholar, Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1923, vol. iv, pt. 2, pp. 133–49Google Scholar.
page 67 note 3 Smith, R. A. and Dewey, H., Archaeologia, 1913, vol. lxiv, pp. 174–204Google Scholar; 1914, vol. lxv, pp. 187–212.
page 67 note 4 Burchell, J. P. T., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1931, vol. vi, pt. 4, pp. 255–8Google Scholar.
page 67 note 5 Moir, J. Reid, Man, 1931, Sept., no. 188.
page 67 note 6 A Guide to the Antiquities of the Stone Age, British Museum, 1926, p. 31.
page 67 note 7 Calkin, J. B., Nature, 1932, vol. cxxx, p. 813CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 67 note 8 Hinton, M. A. C. and Kennard, A. S., Essex Naturalist, 1907, vol. xv, p. 66Google Scholar, and fig. 2. Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘Dartford’, 1924, p. 97. Dewey, H. and Smith, R. A., Archaeologia, 1923–4, vol. lxxiv, pp. 117–36Google Scholar.
page 68 note 1 Moir, J. Reid, Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1930, vol. vi, pt. 3, pp. 182–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and 211.
page 68 note 2 Smith, R. A., Archaeologia, 1911, vol. lxii, pp. 515–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 68 note 3 Ibid.,
page 68 note 4 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘Dartford’, 1924, p. 98. Dewey, H., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1930, vol. vi, pt. 3, pp. 147–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, 1932, vol. lxxxviii, pp. 35–56Google Scholar.
page 68 note 5 Dewey, H., ibid.,, p. 49.
page 68 note 6 Dewey, H., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1930, vol. vi, pt. 3, p. 149Google Scholar; Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, 1932, vol. lxxxviii, pp. 49–50Google Scholar, and fig. 7.
page 70 note 1 Spurrell, F. C. J., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, 1880, vol. xxxvi, pp. 544–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Chandler, R. H., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1915, vol. ii, pt. 2, pp. 240–8Google Scholar.
page 76 note 1 For a comparable series of small side-scrapers see the British Museum Collection from la Cotte de St. Brelade, Jersey.
page 77 note 1 A Guide to the Antiquities of the Stone Age, British Museum, 1926, p. 35.
page 77 note 2 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘Dartford’, 1924, p. 100.
page 78 note 1 Chandler, R. H., Proc. Geol. Assn., 1914, vol. xxv, p. 67Google Scholar.
page 78 note 2 Chandler, R. H., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1915, vol. ii, pt. 2, pp. 240–8Google Scholar.
page 78 note 3 Chandler, R. H., Proc. Geol. Assn., 1914, vol. xxv, pp. 66–7Google Scholar.
page 78 note 4 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘Dartford’, 1924, p. 98.
page 78 note 5 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘ London District’, 1922, pp. 59–62; ‘North London’, 1925, p. 50. A Guide to the Antiquities of the Stone Age, British Museum, 1926, p. 14. Sandford, K. S., Geol. Mag., 1932, vol. lxix, Jan., p. 15Google Scholar.
page 79 note 1 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘London District’, 1922, p. 60; ‘South London’, 1921, p. 54; ‘Dartford’, 1924, p. 106. Sandford, K. S., Geol. Mag., 1932, vol. lxix, Jan., p. 13Google Scholar. Boswell, P. G. H., Brit. Assn. Rep.., York, 1932Google Scholar, Pres. Address, Section C, p. 80.
page 80 note 1 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘Dartford’, 1924, p. 107.
page 80 note 2 Ibid., pp. 100–1.
page 82 note 1 Abbott, W. J. L., Proc. Geol. Assn., 1892, vol. xii, pp. 346–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Layard, Nina F., Antiq. Journ., 1927, vol. vii, pp. 512–14Google Scholar, and fig. 8.
page 82 note 2 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘South London’, 1921, p. 57. Layard, Nina F., Antiq. Journ., 1927, vol. vii, pp. 500–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 82 note 3 Burchell, J. P. T., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1931, vol. vi, pt. 4, pp. 298–301Google Scholar.
page 82 note 4 Burchell, J. P. T., ibid., 1927, vol. v, pt. 3, pp. 288–96.
page 82 note 5 Kennard, A. S., and Woodward, B. B., Proc. Geol. Assn., 1901, vol. xvii, pp. 221–2Google Scholar.
page 84 note 1 Kennard, A. S., and Woodward, B. B., Proc. Geol. Assn., 1922, vol. xxxiii, p. 135Google Scholar.
page 84 note 2 Abbot, W. J.L., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc, 1894, vol. 1, pp. 171–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Kennard, A. S., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1915, vol. ii, pt. 2, pp. 257–8Google Scholar.
page 84 note 3 Kennard, A. S., Proc. Malac. Soc, 1923, vol. xv, pt. 5, p. 246Google Scholar.
page 84 note 4 Kennard, A. S., and Woodward, B. B., Proc. Geol. Assn., 1901, vol. xvii, pp. 221–2Google Scholar.
page 87 note 1 Moir, J. Reid, Journ. Roy. Anthrop. Inst, 1917, vol. xlvii, pp. 367–412Google Scholar; Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1927, vol. v, pt. 2, pp. 232–52Google Scholar.
page 89 note 1 Moir, J. Reid, Antiq. Journ., 1930, vol. x, pt. 4, pp. 359–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1931, vol. vi, pt. 4, pp. 306–15Google Scholar. Burchell, J. P. T., Proc. Preh. Soc. East Anglia, 1930, vol. vi, pl. 3, pp. 232–3Google Scholar ; Antiq. Journ., 1930, vol. x, pl. 4, pp. 371–83Google Scholar.
page 90 note 1 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘London District’, 1922, pp. 59–62.
page 90 note 2 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘South London’, 1921, p. 53.
page 91 note 1 Mem. Geol. Survey, ‘Dartford’, 1924, p. 107.
- 25
- Cited by