No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2012
The beautiful coloured drawing which you were pleased to exhibit at the Society, is so very curious, in regard to the many singularities which attend it, at least in my eye, that I request your favourable acceptance of a few additional observations upon it.
page 50 note [a] Engraved in Archæologia, vol. IX. p. 368.
page 51 note [b] Account of Fitz-Stephen prefixed to his Description of London, A. 1772, p. 8.
page 51 note [c] Fitz Stephen, p. 78.
page 51 note [d] Rog. Hoveden, p. 521. Annal. Dustap. p. 33. Rad. de Diceto et Gervas. inter X Script, col. 515. 1414. 1672. Dugdale, Baron. I. p. 678. Lord Lyttelton, Vol. IV. p. 353.
page 51 note [e] i. e. Thomam.
page 51 note [f] This certainly should be Urci or Ursi, as all authors call him; Caxton also naming him Bereson.
page 51 note [g] That is, Morville.
page 51 note [h] i. e. Brito.
page 52 note [i] This is particular both as to the quantity of the middle syllable, and the termination; but the like errors occur often in monkish verses.
page 52 note [k] Ecton.
page 52 note [l] Archæol. vol. IX. p. 368.
page 53 note [m] There is no mention of a church at Bretone, which is placed Mildestvic hundred, by which name Northwich hundred went at the making of Domesday, (Leycester, p. 421.)