No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2012
Without at present attempting to discuss the question whether a city, town, or village occupied the present site of the city of London before the Roman invasion of this country, it is enough for the purpose of this paper to assume as a fixed fact, resting on irresistible evidence and which all parties admit, that the existing area of the city proper, that is, the space between the walls and gates which stood a little more than a century ago, was (with the exception of the Blackfriars' precinct) occupied by the Romans up to the time when their legions were recalled to the continent, and the Roman government ceased in this island. But. that the whole of this area was originally the city, is not, I believe, asserted by any antiquaries or historians; it is evidently too large to have been originally selected or laid out for a city, being capable of containing several of the cities and towns which were built and walled in by the Romans in this country.
page 44 note a Pennant's Account of London, 2nd ed. 4to. 1791, pp. 3, 4.
page 44 note b Stephanides, in Stowe's London, 1633, fol. p. 705.
page 44 note c Stowe's London, 1633, fol. p. 301.
page 45 note a Vol. XXXIII. pp. 101—124.
page 45 note b Ibid. pp. 118–120.
page 45 note c London, 1859, 4to, p. 21.
page 46 note a Stow's London, 1633, fol. p. 819.
page 47 note a Stow's London, p. 308.
page 47 note b Ibid.
page 47 note c Ibid. p. 704.
page 47 note d Pp. 18, 19.