Article contents
II.—An Examination of two Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts of the Winchester School: the Missal of Robert of Fumièges, and the Benedictional of St. Æthelwold
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2011
Extract
The English Sacramentary now in the Public Library at Rouen, and known by this name, has been the subject of several inquiries into its origin, and various opinions have been put forward as to the place where, and the identity of the church for which, it was written.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1933
References
page 27 note 1 Press mark, Y. 6.
page 27 note 2 Bibliographical, Antiquarian, and Picturesque Tour in France and Germany, vol. i, p. 165.
page 27 note 3 The Leofric Missal, p. 275 et seq.
page 27 note 4 Facsimiles of Miniatures and Ornaments in Anglo-Saxon and Irish Manuscripts, p. 136 et seq.
page 27 note 5 E. Frere, Manuel du Bibliographe Normand, vol. ii, p. 310 et seq.
page 27 note 6 ‘An investigation of two Anglo-Saxon Kalendars, Missal of Robert of Jumièges and St. Wulfstan's Homiliary’, Archaeologia, vol. lxxviii, p. 219 et seq.
page 27 note 7 Abbot Gasquet and Edmund Bishop, The Bosworth Psalter, 1908.
page 27 note 8 Op. cit., p. 161. It will be convenient to retain the symbol ‘R’ for this manuscript.
page 28 note 1 Fol. 29, ed., p. 47.
page 28 note 2 Fol. 179, ed., p. 247.
page 28 note 3 Fol. 201v, ed., p. 279.
page 28 note 4 Fol. 208, ed., pp. 288–9.
page 29 note 1 Head given to Old Minster by King Athelstan.
page 29 note 2 Translated to New Minster from St. Josse-sur-Mer in 903.
page 29 note 3 Included in this list because of the cult at Peterborough which arose in consequence of the translation thither of an arm.
page 30 note 1 Such accidental omissions are by no means uncommon. A particularly obvious example occurs in the Hyde Abbey calendar in Bodleian Gough MS. liturg. 8, from which several feasts that should have been written in gold are wanting, but there are definite indications that they should have been inserted, and one name is left unfinished.
page 30 note 2 Printed in R. T. Hampson, Medii aevi Kalendarium, 1841, vol. i, p. 422 et seq.
page 30 note 3 The later additions to this calendar are not taken into consideration.
page 30 note 4 Neglecting St. Augustine whose omission from T can hardly have been intentional.
page 31 note 1 Also St. Matthias (Feb. 24), probably an accidental omission from T.
page 31 note 2 On 17 March.
page 31 note 3 Bodleian Gough MSS. liturg. 8.
page 31 note 4 Bodleian Rawlinson MSS. liturg. e. 1*.
page 31 note 5 B. M. Harleian MSS. 960.
page 32 note 1 Op. tit., p. 161.
page 32 note 2 In addition to these feasts T and V both insert St. Elphege (19 April) and the Conception of our Lady (8 Dec), but both of these are of later introduction than the calendar of R.
page 33 note 1 Probably an accidental omission from R.
page 34 note 1 Vatican MS. Reginensis 12.
page 35 note 1 Lambeth Palace MS. 198a, fol. 166v.
page 35 note 2 Bodleian Douce MS. 296.
page 36 note 1 Edn., p. xxxviii.
page 36 note 2 B.M. Arundel MS. 377.
page 36 note 3 Cambridge University Library, Ii. iv. 20. fo. 265.
page 37 note 1 Register and Martyrology of New Minster and Hyde Abbey. Ed. W. de Gray Birch, London, 1892, pp. 22 et seq.
page 38 note 1 Trinity College, Cambridge, o. 2. 1 late twelfth century; B. M. Arundel MSS. 377, c. 1176; Harl. 547 early fourteenth century; Additional 33381 fifteenth century.
page 39 note 1 Her feast on 23rd June is found in the calendars of the Bosworth Psalter, Arundell MSS. 60 and 155, but not her translation.
page 39 note 2 The name of St. Cuthburga, one time a nun at Barking and later Abbess of Wimborne, is not entered in the only known calendar of Barking which is dated 1404. Univ. Coll., Oxford, MS. 169.
page 41 note 1 Archaeologia, vol. xxiv.
page 41 note 2 E. G. Millar, English Illuminated Manuscripts from the Tenth to the Thirteenth Century, 1926.
page 42 note 1 Part of this is now illegible. Gage read the name as Sancta Maria Magdalena, but as Sir G. F. Warner points out there is no benediction for her feast, and the words should read Mater Christi.
- 1
- Cited by