No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2012
It has been observed on a former occasion that the county of Derby in the British times constituted a part of that large tribe, the Coritani, or Coitanni, consequently it had then no peculiar provincial name.
page 17 note [a] Charta Hen. I. in Chartulario Decani Linc. Domesday has Derbyscire, as we write now, c having the power of ch. See Hearne's Cur. Disc. p. 46.
page 17 note [b] Nichols's Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 47.
page 17 note [c] Ibid. p. 46.
page 17 note [d] Camden, col. 587.
page 18 note [e] This opinion is also embraced by Bp. Gibson, Camd. col. 587.
page 18 note [f] This Etymon I prefer to that from bi, juxta, & dur aqua, offered by Bp. Gibson, ad Chron, Sax. p. 24. as, in that case, it ought rather to be bidur than Durbi.
page 18 note [h] Ethelwerd, p. 843. H. Huntingdon calls it Derebi, on the same occasion P. 353.
page 18 note [h] H. Hunt. l. c. The Castle was demolished at this time, and, as I think, never rebuilt. However, if it was, king Edmund retook it. Item, p. 355.
page 18 note [i] Chron. Sax. A. 918.
page 19 note [k] Sir And. Fountaine, in Dr. Hickes's Thesaur. Tom. II. tab. II. The name also occurs there on a coin of king Edgar, tab. V.
page 19 note [l] Nichols's Biblioth. Top. Brit. XXIV. p. 47. Arch. VII. p. 174.
page 20 note [m] Galgacus, indeed, seems to insinuate, in his speech, that the Romans did not pay, but compelled, the natives to work at the mines as slaves; but this we may regard as a rhetorical flourish.
page 20 note [n] It will be mentioned below.
page 21 note [o] Arch. Vol. III. p. 274.
page 22 note [p] Arch. Vol. VII. p. 363.
page 22 note [q] Dr. Plott, Nat. Hist. of Staff. p. 404.
page 24 note [r] Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 9. & seq.
page 24 note [s] Ibid. p. 34. & seq.
page 24 note [t] Dr. Plott, Hist. of Staff. p. 402.
page 24 note [u] Archæologia, Vol. III. p. 237.
page 24 note [x[ Ibid.
page 24 note [y] Ibid.
page 24 note [z] Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 35.
page 25 note [a] II. p. 8.
page 25 note [b] Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 23.
page 25 note [c] Dr. Plott, Staff. p. 402. Mr. Hutchinson, Hist. of Durham, II. p. 486.
page 26 note [d/ Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 13.
page 26 note [e] Camden, col. 587. Leland, Itin. VI. p. 131.
page 26 note [f] Of Derby and the two Derbentios, see more in Bibl. Top. Brit. p. 21.
page 26 note [g] Richard, Bibl. Top. Brit. p. 13.
page 26 note [h] Ibid. p. 28.
page 26 note [i] Ibid. p. 29.
page 26 note [k] Ibid. p. 30.
page 27 note [l] N° XXIV. p. 34.
page 27 note [m] See our 2d head, the Roads.
page 27 note [n] Archaeologia, Vol. III. p. 237.
page 27 note [o] Bibl. Top. Brit. p. 35.
page 27 note [p] Ibid. For a further account of the old Roman Bath discovered in 1781, see there p. 36.
page 28 note [q] Apollo, perhaps, or Minerva.
page 28 note [r] Archæologia, Vol. III. p. 236.
page 28 note [s] Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 26. See Mr. Pilkington, vol. II. p. 317.
page 29 note [t] See Mr. Bray's Tour, p. 202. Mr. Pilkington's View, II. p, 402.
page 29 note [u] Archæologia, Vol. VIII. p. 58.
page 30 note [x] See the plate, p. 35.
page 30 note [y] See above, Art. 3.
page 30 note [O] Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 26.
page 30 note [a] Ibid. p. 29.
page 31 note [b] Information of Rev. Chaworth Hallowes, Rector of Pleasley, 1788.
page 32 note [c] See Mr. Pilkington's View, II. p. 285.
page 32 note [d] Printed 1766, p. 15.
page 32 note [e] Archæologia, Vol. III. p. 236.
page 33 note [f] Archæologia, Vol. VII. p. 138.
page 33 note [g] Ibid. p. 131.
page 33 note [h] Maty's Review, 1785, p. 351.
page 33 note [i] Plott, Nat. Hist. of Staff. p. 403. See also Mr. Gough's Sepulchral Monuments, p. i.
page 35 note [k] Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 19.
page 35 note [l] Mr. Drake, Eboracum, p. 53. Mr. Brand, Hist, of Newcastle.
page 35 note [m] Bibl. Top. Brit. N° XXIV. p. 19.
page 36 note [n] Itin. II. p. 61.
page 36 note [o] Dr. Plott, Staff. p. 403. 405.