No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2011
In preparing this paper I have tried to choose a subject of equal interest to both our countries. The peculiar decorative style of the Migration period is common to Anglo-Saxon England and to Scandinavia; and with equal ardour archaeologists on both sides have been engaged in solving its fascinating problems. Especially in recent years English antiquaries have made most valuable contributions, which seem to call for a revision of current Scandinavian opinions about these questions. In acknowledgement of the high merits of English archaeology in this complex and difficult research, I shall try to set forth how far a Norse student may accept the explanation offered by eminent English scholars like Dr. Ellis Minns and Mr. Reginald A. Smith.
page 107 note 1 I have to thank the following institutions for lending me illustrations: Bergens Museum, Bergen; Universitetets Oldsaksamling, Oslo; Videnskaps-Akademiet, Oslo; Kgl. Videnskaberens Selskab, Trondhjem.
page 111 note 1 Konow, Sten, ‘Goths in Ancient India’ (Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, 1912, p. 359Google Scholar).
page 114 note 1 Boulanger, , Le Mobilier Funéraire Gallo-Romain et Franc en Picardie et en Artois (Paris, 1902–5)Google Scholar. Pl. xix fig. 7.
page 114 note 2 Minns, Ellis H., Scythians and Greeks, p. 274, fig. 193.Google Scholar
page 115 note 1 Foreningen til norske Fortidsmindesmerkers Bevaring: Aarsberetning, 1900, p. 299, figs. 10 and ii.
page 118 note 1 Engelhardt, C., Fynske Mosefund no. II, Vimose Fundet (Kjøbenhavn, 1869)Google Scholar, pl. IV, 1.