No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2011
At first sight it would seem somewhat profitless to select as the subject of a paper a building not one stone of which can ordinarily be seen, but the great Benedictine church of St. Peter, Westminster, stands so high in the affection of the English-speaking races that even the smallest contribution to its story may be assured beforehand of a welcome. Moreover, there is a certain appropriateness in the fact that by an undesigned coincidence that contribution should be offered on March 21st, the feast of St. Benedict himself.
page 31 note 1 Westminster Domesday, f. 507 b.
page 32 note 1 Domesday Chartulary, f. 568b.
page 32 note 2 Liberate Roll, 18 Jan. 1240.
page 32 note 3 Domesday Chartulary, f. 566b.
page 32 note 4 Close Roll, 24 April, 1234.
page 33 note 1 Westminster Abbey and the King's Craftsmen, pp. 141, 161.
page 33 note 2 Close Roll, 5 July, 1244.
page 34 note 1 Archaeological Journal, March 1894, p. 18.Google Scholar
page 34 note 2 Westminster Abbey and the King's Craftsmen, p. 144 n.Google Scholar
page 38 note 1 Archaeologia, lxii, 81.Google Scholar
page 38 note 2 Journal of R.I.B. A., 3rd S., xvii, 80.Google Scholar
page 40 note 1 Westminster Abbey and the King's Craftsmen, pp. 150–60.Google Scholar
page 40 note 2 Windsor Castle.
page 40 note 3 Matthew of Westminster.
page 41 note 1 Gleanings, p. 20.Google ScholarPubMed
page 41 note 2 Lethaby, p. 126.
page 41 note 3 Westminster Abbey, p. 109.Google ScholarPubMed
page 42 note 1 Demaison, Louis, Congrès archéologique de France à Reims, 1911, vol. i, pp. 19–55.Google Scholar
page 43 note 1 Since the above was written Dr. Scott, E. J. L., Keeper of the Abbey Muniments, has told me that in his view Reyns is a phonetic rendering of the common pronunciation of Reims. Professor de Feuillerat of Rennes often asserted to him that the correct pronunciation of Reims is as if spelt Rines.Google Scholar
page 44 note 1 Westminster Abbey and the King's Craftsmen, p. 143.Google Scholar
page 45 note 1 Monks of Westminster, p. 72.Google Scholar
page 46 note 1 Customary, ii, 92.Google Scholar
page 46 note 2 Cf. Monks of Westminster, p. 21 f.Google Scholar