Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:40:09.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Word superiority effect for native Chinese readers and low-proficiency Chinese learners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2018

LIN CHEN ,
CHARLES PERFETTI ,
YING LENG  and
YOU LI
LIN CHEN*
Affiliation:
Sun Yat-sen University
CHARLES PERFETTI*
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
YING LENG
Affiliation:
Nan Tong University
YOU LI
Affiliation:
South China Normal University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Lin Chen, School of Foreign Languages, Sun Yat-sen University, 135 Xingangxi Road, Guangzhou 510275, China. E-mail: [email protected]; or Charles Perfetti, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. E-mail: [email protected]
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Lin Chen, School of Foreign Languages, Sun Yat-sen University, 135 Xingangxi Road, Guangzhou 510275, China. E-mail: [email protected]; or Charles Perfetti, Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3939 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Written word recognition in Chinese links the perception of individual characters with whole words. With experience in reading, a high-quality word representation can provide top-down influence on the perception of its constituent characters, thus producing a word superiority effect (WSE). In experiments using the Reicher–Wheeler paradigm, we examined the WSE in two-character words for native Chinese readers (Experiment 1) and low-proficiency adult Chinese learners with Thai (Experiment 2a) and Indonesian (Experiment 2b) as native language backgrounds. For native Chinese readers, the WSE was smaller for high-frequency than low-frequency characters, reflecting rapid access to more frequently experienced characters and a consequent reduction of top-down word-level effects. Learners of Chinese, however, showed a strong WSE for both low-frequency and high-frequency characters, reflecting less well-established character representations combined with word-level knowledge sufficient to support character recognition. The results suggest that native Chinese readers develop strong representations at both the character and the word level, while low-proficiency Chinese learners are more dependent on the word level. We discuss the possibility that a word-level emphasis Chinese foreign language instruction is one reason for this pattern.

Keywords

character frequencylow-proficiency adult Chinese learnersnative Chinese readersword superiority effect
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 39 , Issue 6 , November 2018 , pp. 1097 - 1115
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.Google Scholar
Bai, X., Liang, F., Blythe, H. I., Zang, C., Yan, G., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Interword spacing effects on the acquisition of new vocabulary for readers of Chinese as a second language. Journal of Research in Reading, 36 (Suppl. 1), S4–S17.Google Scholar
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLOS ONE, 5, e10729.Google Scholar
Chen, L. (2015). Roles of morpheme and word in phonological processing of Chinese compound words for primary Chinese learners [语素和整词在初级汉语二语者合成词语音识别中的作用研究]. TCSOL Studies, 3, 1–5.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Zhong, L. J., & Leng, Y. (2017). Word superiority effect for low proficiency Korean-Chinese learners. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49, 1277–1286.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. M. (1981). Perception of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 137–153.Google Scholar
Coch, D., & Mitra, P. (2010). Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform. Brain Research, 1329, 159–174.Google Scholar
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Categorical or nominal independent variables. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 302–353). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., Bouttevin, S., Truc, C., Bastien, M., & Ziegler, J. (2003). Word superiority, pseudoword superiority, and learning to read: A comparison of dyslexic and normal readers. Brain and Language, 87, 432–440.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. C. (1981). Understanding word perception: Clues from studying the word-superiority effect. In O. J. L. Tzeng & H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kuo, W. J., Yeh, T. C., Lee, C. Y., Wu, Y. T., Chou, C. C., Ho, L. T., & … Hsieh, J. C. (2003). Frequency effects of Chinese character processing in the brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 18, 720–730.Google Scholar
Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese Research Team (2009). Lexicon of common words in contemporary Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2011). Word knowledge influences character perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 833–839.Google Scholar
Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525–552.Google Scholar
Liu, I. M., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, 59, 149–168.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). The time course of brain activity in reading English and Chinese: An ERP study of Chinese bilinguals. Human Brain Mapping, 18, 167–175.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Wang, M., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Threshold-style processing of Chinese characters for adult second-language learners. Memory & Cognition, 35, 471–480.Google Scholar
Maechler, M., & Bates, D. (2010). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version, 099937-099935). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Mattingly, I. G., & Xu, Y. (1994). Word superiority in Chinese. In Chang, H.-W., Huang, J.-T., Hue, C.-W. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing: Vol. 1. Selected writing from the Sixth International Symposium on Cognitive Aspects of Chinese language (pp. 101–111). Taipei: National Taiwan University, Department of Psychology.Google Scholar
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: 1. An account of basis findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.Google Scholar
Mok, L. W. (2009). Word-superiority effect as a function of semantic transparency of Chinese bimorphemic compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1039–1081.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101–108.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Extending the E–Z reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021–1034.Google Scholar
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275–280.Google Scholar
Shen, D., Liversedge, S. P., Tian, J., Zang, C., Cui, L., Bai, X., & … Rayner, K. (2012). Eye movements of second language learners when reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 192–202.Google Scholar
Shen, W., & Li, X. S. (2012). The uniqueness of word superiority effect in Chinese reading. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57, 3414–3420.Google Scholar
ShiZ, Y. Z, Y. (2008). Preliminary discussion on word, morpheme and character teaching [词·语素·汉字教学初探]. Chinese Teaching in the World, 2, 109–118.Google Scholar
Starrfelt, R., Petersen, A., & Vangkilde, S. (2013). Don’t words come easy? A psychophysical exploration of word superiority. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–8.Google Scholar
Tong, X., He, X., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). Tone matters for Cantonese–English bilingual children’s English word reading development: A unified model of phonological transfer. Memory & Cognition, 45, 320–333.Google Scholar
Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97, 67–88.Google Scholar
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59–85.Google Scholar
Yan, G. L., Tian, H. J., Bai, X. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(Pt 2), 259–268.Google Scholar
Zhang, P. P. (1992). The comparison between word-based teaching and character-based teaching [词本位教学法和字本位教学法的比较]. Chinese Teaching in the World, 3, 222–223.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2009). Pseudohomophone effects in processing Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1009–1038.Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525–565.Google Scholar