Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:50:46.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in the learning of complex morphophonology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2012

MARC ETTLINGER ,
ANN R. BRADLOW  and
PATRICK C. M. WONG
MARC ETTLINGER
Affiliation:
Northwestern University and Department of Veterans Affairs
ANN R. BRADLOW
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
PATRICK C. M. WONG*
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong and Northwestern University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Patrick Wong, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2240 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores how theories on the relationship between language and domain-general cognitive capabilities might account for individual variation in second language learning. We investigated the acquisition of a morphophonological grammar paired with standardized tests of memory function. The language learned had simple and complex morphophonological patterns of word formation, which are hypothesized to correlate with standardized measures of procedural and declarative memory, respectively. The results show a significant amount of variation in learning success is accounted for by these measures of memory in accordance with the hypothesis. These findings help explain why some adults are able to learn a second language more easily than others while also advancing a model of second language learning motivated by linguistic theory.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 807 - 831
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.Google Scholar
Al-Mozainy, H. Q. (1981). Vowel alternations in a bedouin Hijazi Arabic dialect: Abstractness and stress. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Bakovic, E. (2007). A revised typology of opaque generalizations. Phonology, 24, 217–259.Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word—Journal of the International Linguistic Association, 14, 150–177.Google Scholar
Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Hyona, J. (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13–B25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. P., & Blevins, J. (2009). Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.19) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.orgGoogle Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Accoustic Society of America, 101, 2299–2310.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clegg, B. A., Digirolamo, G. J., & Keele, S. W. (1998). Sequence learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 275–281.Google Scholar
Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key. Cognition, 114, 356–371.Google Scholar
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature, 380, 499–505.Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Case, R. (1981). Syntactic form, semantic complexity, and short-term memory—Influences on children's acquisition of new linguistic structures. Developmental Psychology, 17, 367–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R., Elreyes, A., & Iverson, G. K. (2003). Some principles of second language phonology. Second Language Research, 19, 169–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F. R., Moravcsik, E. A., & Wirth, J. R. (1983). Markedness. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, H. (2001). The hippocampus and declarative memory: Cognitive mechanisms and neural codes. Behavioral Brain Research, 127, 199–207.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J. (2001). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, M. (2008). Input-driven opacity. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, M., Margulis, E. H., & Wong, P. C. (2011). Implicit memory in music and language. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 211.Google Scholar
Evans, J. L., Saffran, J. R., & Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 52, 321–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, V. S., Bock, K., Wilson, M. P., & Cohen, N. J. (2008). Memory for syntax despite amnesia. Psychological Science, 19, 940–946.Google Scholar
Finley, S. (2008). Formal and cognitive restrictions on vowel harmony. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Finley, S., & Badecker, W. (2009). Artificial grammar learning and feature-based generalization. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 423–437.Google Scholar
Finley, S., & Christiansen, M. H. (2011). Multimodal transfer of repetition patterns in artificial grammar learning. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Golestani, N., Paus, T., & Zatorre, R. J. (2002). Anatomical correlates of learning novel speech sounds. Neuron, 35, 997–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golestani, N., & Zatorre, R. J. (2009). Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology. Brain and Language, 109, 55–67.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, J. L., & Graf, P. (1989). Preschool period development of implicit and explicit remembering. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 417–420.Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2009). The speaking brain. Science, 326, 372–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second language syntax: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/–/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Accoustic Society of America, 118, 3267–3278.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, aphasie, und allgemeine lautgesetze [Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals]. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jilka, M. (2009). Talent and proficiency in language. In Dogil, G. & Reiterer, S. (Eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 1–16). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 705–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiparsky, P. (1973). Abstractness, opacity, and global rules. In Fujimura, O. (Ed.), Three dimensions of linguistic theory (pp. 57–86). Tokyo: TEC Corp.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 11850–11857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengeris, A., & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Accoustic Society of America, 128, 3757–3768.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Liphola, M. (2001). Aspects of phonology and morphology of ShiMakonde. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (2005). Optimal paradigms. In Downing, L., Hall, T. A., & Raffelsiefen, R. (Eds.), Paradigms in phonological theory (pp. 170–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2011). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 61, 1–30.Google Scholar
Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2010). On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 31.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Heay, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psychological studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Moreton, E. (2008). Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology, 25, 83–127.Google Scholar
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.Google Scholar
Opitz, B., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Interactions of the hippocampal system and the prefrontal cortex in learning language-like rules. NeuroImage, 19, 1730–1737.Google Scholar
Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 29, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism. In Ellis, N. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of second languages (pp. 393–419). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, L. H., Wynn, V., Gilhooly, K. J., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. H. (1999). The role of memory in the Tower of London task. Memory, 7, 209–231.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: What's special about it? Cognition, 95, 201–236.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 456–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pycha, A., Nowak, P., Shin, E., & Shosted, R. (2003). Phonological rule-learning and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. In Garding, G. & Tsujimura, M. (Eds.), WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 423–435). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, E. M. (2007). The serial reaction time task: Implicit motor skill learning? Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 10073–10075.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 46–73.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2010). Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they? Language Learning, 60 (Suppl. 2), 245–263.Google Scholar
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., Cash, S. S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E. (2009). Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area. Science, 326, 445–449.Google Scholar
Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign-language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155–172.Google Scholar
Shohamy, D., & Adcock, R. A. (2010). Dopamine and adaptive memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14.Google Scholar
Shohamy, D., Myers, C. E., Hopkins, R. O., Sage, J., & Gluck, M. A. (2009). Distinct hippocampal and basal ganglia contributions to probabilistic learning and reversal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1821–1833.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, W. A. (2010). Untangling memory from perception in the medial temporal lobe. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 195–200.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2005). Differentiating lexical form, meaning, and structure in the neural language system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8375–8380.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H., & van de Weijer, J. (1995). Vowel harmony. In Goldsmith, J. A. (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 495–534). Reading, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vicari, S., Marotta, L., Menghini, D., Molinari, M., & Petrosini, L. (2003). Implicit learning deficit in children with developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 41, 108–114.Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.Google Scholar
White, L. (2007). Linguistic theory, universal grammar, and second language acquisition. In B. Patten, Van & Williams, J. (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 37–55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N., & Lovatt, P. (2003). Phonological memory and rule learning. Language Learning, 53, 67–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, C. (2006). Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science, 30, 945–982.Google Scholar
Wong, P. C. M., & Perrachione, T. K. (2007). Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 565–585.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities examiner's manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar