Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:35:09.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of cohesive markers in narratives by children with Williams syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2011

NANCY ELIZABETH JONES
NANCY ELIZABETH JONES*
Affiliation:
Autism Speaks and University of California, Los Angeles
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Nancy Elizabeth Jones, Autism Speaks, 5455 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2250, Los Angeles, CA 90036. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined how children and adolescents with Williams syndrome (WS; ages 8 years, 0 months [8;0]–14;5) used referential devices (determiners and pronouns), tense, and connectives to create cohesion in oral narratives based on a storybook compared to typically developing mentally and chronologically age-matched children. WS children used cohesive devices in narratives similarly to mentally matched children, but their performance differed from the chronologically matched children only for referential cohesion. WS children's grammatical error rates were similar to both the mentally and chronologically matched children. Implications for the characterization of the language profile of individuals with WS and considerations for the focus of future narrative research are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 277 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, J., Anker, S., Braddick, O., Nokes, L., Mason, A., & Braddick, F. (2001). Visual and visuospatial development in young children with Williams syndrome. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 43, 330–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamberg, M. (1987). The acquisition of narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beliavsky, N. (2003). The sequential acquisition of pronominal reference in narrative discourse. Word, 54, 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, U., Adolphs, R., Cassady, C., & Chiles, M. (1999). Towards the neural basis for hypersociability in a genetic syndrome. NeuroReport, 10, 1653–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., Neville, H., Doherty, S., & Jernigan, T. (1992). Language, cognition, and brain organization in a neurodevelopmental disorder. In Gunnar, M. & Nelson, C. (Eds.), Developmental behavioral neuroscience: Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Mills, D., Galaburda, A., & Korenberg, J. (1999). Bridging cognition, the brain, and molecular genetics: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, R., & Katzenberg, I. (1998). Cognitive and linguistic factors in the development of picture-series narration. Studi Italani Di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, 27, 21–46.Google Scholar
Berman, R., & Slobin, D. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., Lacroix, A., & Reilly, J. (2003). La narration chez les enfants atteints du syndrome de Williams: Aspects structuraux et pragmatiques. Enfance, 3, 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, J., & Mervis, C. B. (1996). Longitudinal analysis of drawings by children with Williams syndrome: A developmental perspective. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. (1998). Development of the Children's Communication Checklist (CCC): A method for assessing the qualitative aspects of communicative impairment in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language, 7, 235–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, J. (2007). Language abilities in Williams syndrome: A critical review. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 97–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H., & Almazan, M. (1998). Syntax and morphology in Williams syndrome. Cognition, 68, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H., & Almazan, M. (2001). Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams syndrome and SLI. Lingua, 111, 729–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Ring, M., & Temple, C. (2004). Lexical and morphological skills in English speaking children with Williams syndrome. In Bartke, S. & Siegmuller, J. (Eds.), Williams syndrome across languages (pp. 221–244). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M., Udwin, O., & Howlin, P. (1998). Adults with Williams syndrome: Preliminary study of social, emotional, and behavioral difficulties. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 273–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, T., Bellugi, U., Korenberg, J., & Graham, J. (2004). “Everybody in the world is my friend.” Hypersociability in young children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 124A, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dykens, E. M., Hodapp, R., & Finucane, B. (2000). Genetics and mental retardation syndromes: A new look at behavior and interventions. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.Google Scholar
Gosch, A., & Pankau, R. (1997). Personality characteristics and behavior problems in individuals of different ages with Williams syndrome. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39, 327–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hemphill, L., Picardi, N., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (1991). Narrative as an index of communicative competence in mildly mentally retarded children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, M. (1980). Creating referents in discourse: A developmental analysis of linguistic cohesion. In Kreiman, J. & Ojeda, E. (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on pronouns and anaphora (pp. 192–203). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T., & Hyams, N. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 106, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. A., & Shapiro, L. (1991). From knowing to telling: The development of children's scripts, stories and personal narratives. In McCabe, A. & Peterson, C. (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 89–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Joffe, V., & Varlokosta, S. (2007). Patterns of syntactic development in children with William's syndrome and Down's syndrome: Evidence from passives and wh-questions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 705–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, A., Rowe, M. L., & Mervis, B. (2009). Referential communication skills of children with Williams syndrome: Understanding when messages are not adequate. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, W., Bellugi, U., Lai, Z., Chiles, M., Reilly, J., Lincoln, A., et al. (2000). Hypersociability in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Suppl.), 30–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1985). Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Grant, J., Bethoud, I., Davies, M., Howlin, P., & Udwin, O. (1997). Language and Williams syndrome: How intact is intact? Child Development, 68, 246–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Tyler, L., Voice, K., Sims, K., Udwin, O., Howlin, P., et al. (1998). Linguistic dissociations in Williams syndrome: Evaluating receptive syntax in on-line and off-line tasks. Neuropsychologia, 36, 343–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Laing, E., Butterworth, G., Ansari, D., Gsödl, M., Longhi, E., Panagiotaki, G., et al. (2002). Atypical development of language and social communication in toddlers with Williams syndrome. Developmental Science, 5, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, G., & Bishop, D. (2004). Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: A comparison with Down's syndrome and specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 45–64.Google Scholar
Lorusso, M., Galli, R., Libera, L, Gagliaridi, C., Borgatti, R., & Hollebrandse, B. (2007). Indicators of theory of mind in narrative production: A comparison between individuals with genetic syndromes and typically developing children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 37–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losh, M., Bellugi, U., Reilly, J., & Anderson, D. (2000). Narrative as a social engagement tool: the excessive use of evaluation in narratives from children with Williams syndrome. Narrative Inquiry, 10, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.Google Scholar
Mervis, C., & Becerra, A. (2007). Language and communicative development in Williams syndrome. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mervis, C., Morris, C., Bertrand, J. R. B., & Robinson, B. (1999). Williams syndrome: Findings from an integrated program of research. In Tager-Flusberg, H. (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders (pp. 65–110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mervis, C. B., Morris, C., Klein-Tasman, B., Bertrand, J., Kwitney, S., & Rice, C. (2003). Characteristics of infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome during triadic interactions. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23, 243–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearlman-Avnion, S., & Eviatar, Z. (2002). Narrative analysis in developmental social and linguistic pathologies: Dissociation between emotional and informational language use. Brain and Cognition, 48, 494–499.Google ScholarPubMed
Perneger, T. (1998). What's wrong with the Bonferroni adjustment. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perovic, A., & Wexler, K. (2007). Complex grammar in Williams syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 729–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, C., & McCabe, A. (1991). Linking children's connective use and narrative macrostructure. In McCabe, A. & Peterson, C. (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 29–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Philofsky, A., Fidler, D., & Hepburn, S. (2007). Pragmatic language profiles of school-age children with autism spectrum disorders and Williams syndrome. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 16, 368–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polacco, P. (1990). Thunder cake. New York: Philomel Books.Google Scholar
Porter, M., Coltheart, M., & Langdon, R. (2008). Theory of mind in Williams syndrome assessed using a nonverbal task. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 806–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reilly, J., Klima, E., & Bellugi, U. (1990). Once more with feeling: Affect and language in atypical populations. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, J., Losh, M., Bellugi, U., & Wulfeck, B. (2004). “Frog, where are you?” Narratives in children with specific language impairment, early focal brain injury, and Williams syndrome. Brain and Language, 88, 229–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossen, M., Klima, E., Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., & Jones, W. (1996). Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In Beitchman, J. & Cohen, N. (Eds.), Language, learning and behavior disorders: Development, biological, and clinical perspectives (pp. 367–369). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, A., & Deruelle, C. (2009). Verbal peaks and visual valleys in theory of mind ability in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorder, 39, 651–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, L., & Hudson, J. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: Coherence and cohesion in young children's picture-elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology, 27, 960–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer-Harris, N., Bellugi, U., Bates, E., Jones, W., & Rossen, M. (1997). Contrasting profiles of language development in children with Williams and Down Syndromes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanovik, V. (2006). Social interaction deficits and conversational inadequacy in Williams syndrome. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19, 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanovik, V., Perkins, M., & Howard, S. (2004). Williams syndrome and specific language impairment do not support claims for developmental double dissociations and innate modularity. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanovik, V., Perkins, M., & Howard, S. (2006). Linguistic heterogeneity in Williams syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 20, 547–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (2000). A componential view of theory of mind: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognition, 76, 59–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomc, S. A., Williamson, N. K., & Pauli, R. M. (1990). Temperament in Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 36, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Voice, K., Stevens, T., Grant, J., Udwin, O.et al., (1997). Do individuals with Williams syndrome have bizarre semantics? Evidence for lexical organization using an on-line task. Cortex, 33, 515–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1990). Expressive language of children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 6(Suppl.), 108–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1991). A cognitive and behavioural phenotype in Williams syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 232–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed