Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:31:55.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tense and aspect in childhood language impairment: Contributions from Hungarian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

LAURENCE B. LEONARD ,
ÁGNES LUKÁCS  and
BENCE KAS
LAURENCE B. LEONARD*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
ÁGNES LUKÁCS
Affiliation:
Budapest University of Technology and Economics and Hungarian Academy of Sciences
BENCE KAS
Affiliation:
Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Eötvös Loránd University of Sciences
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Laurence B. Leonard, Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, 500 Oval Drive, Heavilon Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies of children with language impairment (LI) reveal an insensitivity to aspect that may constitute part of the children's deficit. In this study, we examine aspect as well as tense in Hungarian-speaking children with LI. Twenty-one children with LI, 21 TD children matched for age, and 21 TD children matched for receptive vocabulary scores were tested on their comprehension and production of both imperfective and perfective verb forms in past tense contexts. Although the groups did not differ in their comprehension performance, the children with LI were less accurate than both comparison groups in producing both imperfective and perfective forms. Based on these results, it appears that children with LI have difficulties selecting the appropriate aspectual marking in past tense contexts.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 305 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bedore, L., & Leonard, L. (2001). Grammatical morphology deficits in Spanish-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 905–924.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1983). Test for the Reception of Grammar. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Bartke, S., & Göllner, S. (1997). Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 151–171.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Dalalakis, J. (1999). Tense and agreement in Greek SLI: A case study. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 24, 1–25.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csányi, F. I. (1974). Peabody Szókincs-Teszt. Budapest: Bárczi Gusztáv Gyógypedagógiai Föiskola.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. (1999). Groningen dissertations in linguistics: Vol. 28. Specific language impairment in Dutch: Inflectional morphology and argument structure. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P., Leonard, L., Stokes, S., & Wong, A. M.-Y. (2005). The expression of aspect in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 621–634.Google Scholar
Hansson, K., Nettelbladt, U., & Leonard, L. (2000). Specific language impairment in Swedish: The status of verb morphology and word order. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 848–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kas, B., & Lukács, Á. (2011). Magyar Mondatutánmondási Teszt. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Kelly, D., & Rice, M. (1994). Preferences for verb interpretation in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 182–192.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F. (1994). Aspect and syntactic structure. In Kiefer, F. & Kiss, K. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 27. The syntactic structure of Hungarian (pp. 415–464). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krantz, L., & Leonard, L. (2007). The effect of temporal adverbials on past tense production by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L., & Deevy, P. (2010). Tense and aspect in sentence interpretation by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 37, 397–418.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Deevy, P., Kurtz, R., Krantz Chorev, L., Owen, A., Polite, E., et al. (2007). Lexical aspect and the use of very morphology by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 759–777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L., Eyer, J., Bedore, L., & Grela, B. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 741–752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, L., Sabbadini, L., Leonard, J., & Volterra, V. (1987). Specific language impairment in children: A crosslinguistic study. Brain and Language, 32, 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukács, Á., Leonard, L., Kas, B., & Pléh, Cs. (2009). The use of tense and agreement by Hungarian-Speaking children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 98–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V., Wulfeck, B., & Ellis Weismer, S. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: A study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 206–219.Google Scholar
Moore, M., & Johnston, J. (1993). Expressions of past tense by normal and language-impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norbury, C. F., Bishop, D. V. M., & Briscoe, J. (2001). Production of English finite verb morphology: A comparison of SLI and mild-moderate hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 165–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oetting, J., & Horohov, J. (1997). Past-tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 62–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J., & Crago, M. (2001). The morphosyntax of specific language impairment in French: An extended optional default account. Language Acquisition, 9, 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, Z., Schulz, P., & Wymann, K. (2003). Learning the meaning of verbs: What distinguishes language-impaired children from normally developing children? Linguistics, 41, 289–319.Google Scholar
Pléh, Cs. (1992). Verbal prefixes in Hungarian children. In Kenesei, I. & Pléh, Cs. (Eds.), Approaches to Hungarian (Vol. 4, pp. 269–281). Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar
Racsmány, M., Lukács, Á., Németh, D., & Pléh, Cs. (2005). A verbális munkamemória magyar nyelvű vizsgálóeljárásai. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 4, 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J., Court, J., & Raven, J. (1987). Raven's Progressive Matrices and Raven's Colored Matrices. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Redmond, S. (2003). Children's productions of the affix -ed in past tense and past participle contexts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1095–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. (2003). A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Levy, Y. & Schaeffer, J. (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of SLI (pp. 63–94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Noll, K. R., & Grimm, H. (1997). An extended optional infinitive stage in German-speaking children with specific language impairment. Language Acquisition, 6, 255–295.Google Scholar
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 1239–1257.Google Scholar
Rice, M., & Wexler, K. (2001). Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Rice, M., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1412–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, P., & Wittek, A. (2003). Opening doors and sweeping floors: What children with specific language impairment know about telic and atelic verbs. In Beachley, B., Brown, A., & Conlin, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2. pp. 727–738). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. (1995). The acquisition of tense–aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71, 743–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28, 661–681.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint. Lingua, 106, 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (2003). Lenneberg's dream: Learning, normal language development, and specific language impairment. In Levy, Y. & Schaeffer, J. (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 11–61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar