Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:26:27.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spelling disability: A developmental linguistic analysis of pattern abstraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Sybil Schwartz
Sybil Schwartz*
Affiliation:
McGill-Montreal Children's Hospital Learning Centre
*
Dr. Sybil Schwartz, McGill-Montreal Children's Hospital Learning Centre, 3640 de la Montagne, Montréal, Québec H3G 2A8, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ability of Learning Disabled Spellers to abstract spelling patterns was compared to two groups of normal spellers; Poor and Good. One hundred and eighty children were studied: 20 Good Spellers, 20 Poor Spellers, and 20 Learning Disabled Spellers at each age level from 8 to 10 years. Patterns were investigated using three tests; two multiple choice tests, one with nonsense words and one with real words, and a dictation test using nonsense words. The Learning Disabled Spellers showed little ability to abstract patterns at ages 8 and 9 but made considerable improvement from 9 to 10. The performance of the Learning Disabled Spellers was significantly below that of both the Good and Poor Spellers and quite distinct from the Poor Spellers. Error analyses suggest that the responses of the Learning Disabled Spellers are characteristic of those of younger, normal children.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 303 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beers, J. First and second grade childrens' developing orthographic concepts of tense and lax vowels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, 1974.Google Scholar
Beers, J., & Henderson, E.First grade children's developing orthographic concepts. Research in the Teaching of English, Fall, 1977.Google Scholar
Boder, E. Developmental dyslexia: Prevailing diagnostic concepts and a new diagnostic approach. In Myklebust, H. R. (Ed.), Progress in Learning Disabilities (Vol. 2). New York: Grune and Stratton, 1971.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. The adult functioning of children with specific learning disabilities. Final Report Health and Welfare Canada, 08 1981.Google Scholar
Chomsky, C.Invented spelling in the open classroom. In special issue, “Child Language, 1975,” reprinted from Word, 1971, 27, 1–3.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1960, 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, M.The dyslexic child. London: William Heineman Medical Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Durrell, D.Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficulty (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1955.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D.A general model for multivariate analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.Google Scholar
Francis, W. N.The structure of American English. New York: Ronald Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Gibson, E., & Levin, H.The psychology of reading. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Golick, M., & Schwartz, S. Case studies in developmental dyslexia: Implications for theories of dyslexia. Prepublication manuscript, 1983.Google Scholar
Horn, T. D. Spelling. In Ebels, R. L. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Research (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1969.Google Scholar
Kirk, U. Introduction: Toward an understanding of the neuropsychology of language, reading and spelling. In Kirk, U. (Ed.), The neuropsychology of language, reading and spelling. New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lorge, I., & Thorndike, E. L.The Lorge-Thorndike intelligence tests (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1957.Google Scholar
Marsh, G., Friedman, M., Welch, V., & Desberg, P. The development of strategies in spelling. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Naidoo, S.Specific dyslexia. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1972.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. E., & Warrington, E. K. Developmental spelling retardation. In Knights, R. M. and Bakker, D. J. (Eds.), The neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Theoretical approaches. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Read, C.Preschool children's knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 1971, 41, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, C.Children's judgments of phonetic similarities in relation to English spelling. Language Learning, 1973, 23, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, P., Fletcher, J., Clark, W., & Morris, R. Lag, deficit, rate and delay constructs in specific learning disabilities: a re-examination. Prepublication manuscript, 1981.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. A developmental study of children's ability to acquire knowledge of spelling patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, 1975.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. A developmental linguistic analysis of spelling ability in learning disabled children. In Johnson, C. E. and Thew, C. L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international congress for the study of child language. Washington, D. C.: Univ. Press of America, 1982.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S., & Doehring, D.A developmental study of children's ability to abstract spelling patterns. Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 419–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, M. Insensitivity to ordered information and the failure to read. In Singer, M. (Ed.), Competent Reader, disabled reader: Research and application. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1982.Google Scholar
Sweeney, J. E., & Rourke, B. P.Neuropsychological significance of phonetically accurate and phonetically inaccurate spelling errors in younger, and older retarded spellers. Brain and Language, 1978, 6, 212–225.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Education. Assistance to states for education of handicapped children: Procedures for evaluating specific learning disabilities. Federal Register, 1977, 42, 65082–65085.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D.Manual Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1955.Google Scholar