Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:30:33.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Semantic encoding of spoken sentences: Adult aging and the preservation of conceptual short-term memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

DEBORAH M. LITTLE
Affiliation:
University of Illinois and Brandeis University
LAUREN M. McGRATH
Affiliation:
University of Denver and Brandeis University
KRISTEN J. PRENTICE
Affiliation:
University of Maryland and Brandeis University
ARTHUR WINGFIELD
Affiliation:
Brandeis University

Abstract

Traditional models of human memory have postulated the need for a brief phonological or verbatim representation of verbal input as a necessary gateway to a higher level conceptual representation of the input. Potter has argued that meaningful sentences may be encoded directly in a conceptual short-term memory (CSTM) running parallel in time to such a phonological store. The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate two main tenets of the CSTM model: that linguistic context biases selection of information entering the conceptual store, and that information not integrated into a coherent structure is rapidly forgotten. Results confirmed these predictions for spoken sentences heard by both young and older adults, supporting the generality of the model and suggesting that CSTM remains stable in normal aging.

Type
Articles
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alba J. W., & Hasher L.1983. Is memory schematic? Psychological Bulletin, 93, 203231.Google Scholar
Atkinson R. C., & Shiffrin R. M.1968. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 2. Advances in research and theory (pp. 89195). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley A.1986. The fractionation of working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, 1346813472.Google Scholar
Baddeley A.1992. Working memory. Science, 255, 556559.Google Scholar
Baddeley A.2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417423.Google Scholar
Barr R. A., & Giambra L. M.1990. Age-related decrement in auditory. Psychology and Aging, 3, 597599.Google Scholar
Butterworth B., Campbell R., & Howard D.1986. The uses of short-term memory: A case study. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 705737.Google Scholar
Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., & Haller M.1993. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589608.Google Scholar
Caplan D., & Waters G. S.1990. Short-term memory and language comprehension: A critical review of the neuropsychological literature. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice (Eds.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 1153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caplan D., & Waters G. S.1999. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 77126.Google Scholar
Connelly S. L., Hasher L., & Zacks R. T.1991. Age and reading: The impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533541.Google Scholar
Connine C. M., Blasko D. G., & Hall M.1991. Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 234250.Google Scholar
Conrad R.1964. Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 7584.Google Scholar
Dickinson C. V. M., & Rabbitt P. M. A.1991. Simulated visual impairment: Effects on text comprehension and reading speed. Clinical Vision Sciences, 6, 301308.Google Scholar
Engle R. W., Tuholski S. W., Laughlin J. E., & Conway A. R. A.1999. Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309331.Google Scholar
Fallon M., Peelle J. E., & Wingfield A.(in press). Spoken sentence processing in young and older adults modulated by task demands: Evidence from self-paced listening. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences.
Fodor J. A., Bever T. G., & Garrett M. F.1974. The psychology of language. New York: McGraw–Hill.
Glanzer M., Fisher B., & Dorfman D.1984. Short-term storage in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 467486.Google Scholar
Grosjean F.1985. The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 299310.Google Scholar
Hall J., & Mueller G.1997. Audiologist desk reference. San Diego, CA: Singular.
Hartley A. A.1992. Attention. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Janse E.2003. Production and perception of fast speech. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenshap.
Jarvella R. J.1971. Syntactic processing of connected speech. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 409416.Google Scholar
Kahana M. J., Howard M., Zaromb F., & Wingfield A.2002. Age dissociates recency and lag-recency effects in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 530540.Google Scholar
Kahana M. J., & Wingfield A.2000. A functional relation between learning and organization in free recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 516521.Google Scholar
Kausler D. M.1994. Learning and memory in normal aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kemtes K. A., & Kemper S.1997. Younger and older adults' on-line processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Psychology and Aging, 12, 362371.Google Scholar
Little D. M., Prentice K. J., & Wingfield A.2004. Goodness of fit ratings for 1476 English words and 123 sentence frames. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 135143.Google Scholar
Luce P. A., Pisoni D. B., & Goldringer S. D.1990. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In G. T. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marslen-Wilson W. D.1984. Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Martin R. C.1993. Short-term memory and sentence processing: Evidence from neuropsychology. Memory and Cognition, 21, 176183.Google Scholar
Martin R. C.1999. Further fractionations of verbal working memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 106107.Google Scholar
Martin R. C., & Romani C.1994. Verbal working memory and sentence processing: A multiple component view. Neuropsychology, 8, 506523.Google Scholar
Martin R. C., Shelton J. R., & Yaffee L. S.1994. Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 83111.Google Scholar
McCarthy R. A., & Warrington E.1999. Backtracking? Rehearsing and replaying some old arguments about short-term memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 107108.Google Scholar
McCoy S. L., Tun P. A., Cox L. C., Colangelo M., Stewart R. A., & Wingfield A.2005. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 2233.Google Scholar
Monsell S.1984. Components of working memory underlying verbal skills: A “distributed capacities” view. In H. Bouma & D. G. Buowhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 327350). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Morrell C. H., Gordon-Salant S., Pearson J. D., Brant L. J., & Fozard J. L.1996. Age- and gender-specific reference ranges for hearing level and longitudinal changes in hearing level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 19491967.Google Scholar
Murphy D. R., Craik F. I. M., Li K. Z. H., & Schneider B. A.2000. Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance. Psychology and Aging, 15, 323334.Google Scholar
Nelson D. L., McEvoy C. L., & Schreiber T. A.1998. The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available online from http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation.
Nusbaum H. C., Pisoni D. B., & Davis C. K.1984. Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. In D. Pisoni (Ed.), Research on spoken language processing progress report 10 (pp. 357376). Bloomington, IN: Speech Research Laboratory.
Potter M. C.1993. Very short-term conceptual memory. Memory and Cognition, 21, 156161.Google Scholar
Potter M. C.1999. Understanding sentences and scenes: The role of conceptual short-term memory. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 1346). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Potter M. C., Stiefbold D., & Moryadas A.1998. Word selection in reading sentences: Preceding versus following contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 68100.Google Scholar
Rabbitt P. M. A.1991. Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Otolaryngolica, Supplementum 476, 167176.Google Scholar
Saffran E. M., & Martin N.1999. Meaning but not words: Neuropsychological evidence for very short-term conceptual memory. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 225238). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Salthouse T. A.1991. Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Savin H. B., & Perchonock E.1965. Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 348353.Google Scholar
Tun P. A., O'Kane G., & Wingfield A.2002. Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners. Psychology and Aging, 17, 453467.Google Scholar
van Dijk T. A., & Kintsch W.1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Verhaeghen P.2003. Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 332339.Google Scholar
Waters G. S., & Caplan D.2001. Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 16, 128144.Google Scholar
Wayland S. C., Wingfield A., & Goodglass H.1989. Recognition of isolated words: The dynamics of cohort reduction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 475487.Google Scholar
Wechsler D.1997. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). New York: Psychological Corporation.
Wingfield A., & Kahana M. J.2002. The dynamics of memory retrieval in older adulthood. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 187199.Google Scholar
Wingfield A., & Lindfield K. C.1995. Multiple memory systems in the processing of speech: Evidence from aging. Experimental Aging Research, 21, 101121.Google Scholar
Wingfield A., Lindfield K. C., & Kahana M. J.1998. Adult age differences in the temporal characteristics of category free recall. Psychology and Aging, 13, 256266.Google Scholar
Wingfield A., Peelle J. E., & Grossman M.2003. Speech rate and syntactic complexity as multiplicative factors in speech comprehension by young and older adults. Journal of Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 310322.Google Scholar
Wingfield A., & Stine-Morrow E. A. L.2000. Language and speech. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse, The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 359416). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wingfield A., Tun P. A., Koh C. K., & Rosen M. J.1999. Regaining lost time: Adult aging and the effect of time restoration on recall of time-compressed speech. Psychology and Aging, 14, 380389.Google Scholar
Wingfield A., Tun P. A., & Rosen M. J.1995. Age differences in veridical and reconstructive recall of syntactically and randomly segmented speech. Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50, 257266.Google Scholar
Zacks R. T., Hasher L., & Li K. Z. H.2000. Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 293357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.