We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Comrie, B. (1984). Why linguists need language acquirers. In Rutherford, W. (Ed.), Language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Davies, A., Griper, C., & Howatt, A. P. R. (Eds.). (1984). Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., & Nelson, D. (Eds.). (1984). Universals of second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1983). Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kean, M-L. (1984). On the relation between grammatical markedness and L2 markedness: Taxonomic and typological approaches, Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 8(1) 5–23.Google Scholar
Mazurkewich, I. (1984). Dative questions and markedness. In Eckman, F. R., Bell, L. H., & Nelson, D. (Eds.). Universals of second language acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Mazurkewich, I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, W. (Ed.). (1984). Language universals and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. (1984). Some theoretical implications of L2 acquisition research and the grammar of interlanguages. In Davies, A., Criper, C., and Howatt, A. P. R. (Eds.). Interlanguage. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar