Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:56:22.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Real-time sentence processing in children with specific language impairment: The contribution of lexicosemantic, syntactic, and world-knowledge information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2011

FABRIZIO PIZZIOLI  and
MARIE-ANNE SCHELSTRAETE
FABRIZIO PIZZIOLI
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain
MARIE-ANNE SCHELSTRAETE*
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Marie-Anne Schelstraete, Institut de Recherche en Sciences Psychologiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, 10, Place Cardinal Mercier, B-1348 Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigated how lexicosemantic information, syntactic information, and world knowledge are integrated in the course of oral sentence processing in children with specific language impairment (SLI) as compared to children with typical language development. A primed lexical-decision task was used where participants had to make a lexical decision on the last word of a sentence. Thirty-nine children were tested: 13 children with SLI, 13 younger children matched on receptive vocabulary, and 13 age-matched children. We manipulated (a) the semantic fit between the target and the prime sentence, (b) the syntactic structure of the prime (syntactic vs. asyntactic), and (c) the lexical association between the target word and the prime. Despite being slower overall, children with SLI showed a significant priming effect. Syntactic information had a similar impact on thematic integration in control children and children with SLI, although the latter were more sensitive to lexicosemantic association and world knowledge than control groups. In addition, children with SLI appeared to use semantic information even when the sentence was asyntactic. The results suggest thematic integration problems in SLI: syntactic and semantic information contribute independently to the thematic structure but are not integrated to generate the emerging higher order representation.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 181 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avurtin, M. (2006). Weak syntax. In Grodzinsky, Y. & Amunds, K. (Eds.), Broca's region. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1979). Comprehension in developmental language disorders. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 21, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1982). Comprehension of spoken, written, and signed sentences in childhood language disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorder in language comprehension in children. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Boland, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., Garnsey, S. M., & Carlson, G. N. (1995). Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: Evidence from wh-questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 774–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, P., Piñango, M. M., & Wong, K. (2003). Argument movement as a window to language–brain relations. Brain and Language, 86, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1993). The missing agreement account of specific language impairment: Evidence from therapy experiment. Essex Research Report in Linguistics, 2, 1–37.Google Scholar
Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, S. L., Howard, D., & Dodd, B. J. (2004). Auditory lexical-decision in children with language impairment. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Echelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Adaptation française du Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised. Louvain, Belgium: ATM.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., & Lahey, M. (1996). Auditory lexical decision of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Hearing, and Language Research, 39, 1263–1273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis Weismer, S. (1994). Factors influencing novel word learning and linguistic processing in children with specific language impairment. Paper presented at the Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Ellis Weismer, S., & Hesketh, L. J. (1996). Lexical learning by children with specific language impairment: Effects of linguistic input presented at varying speaking rates. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J., & Hesketh, L. (1999). An examination of verbal working memory in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1249–1260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foss, D. J. (1982). A discourse on semantic priming. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 590–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2007). Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer? Brain and Language, 101, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haarmann, H. J., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1997). Aphasic sentence comprehension as a resource deficit: A computational approach. Brain and Language, 59, 76–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoeks, J. C. J., Stowe, L. A., & Doedens, G. (2004). Seeing words in context: The interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Cognitive Brain Research, 19, 59–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, J. (1991). Questions about cognition in children with specific language Impairment. In Miller, J. (Ed.), Research on child language disorders (pp. 299–307). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. (1994). Cognitive abilities in children with specific language impairment. In Watkins, R. & Rice, N. (Eds.), Specific language impairments in children (pp. 107–121). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychologica, 86, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Capland, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecocq, P. (1996). Epreuve de Compréhension Syntaxico–Sémantique. Pas de Calais, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Linebarger, M. C., Schwartz, M. F., & Saffran, E. M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maillart, C., Schelstraete, M.-A., & Hupet, M. (2004). Phonological representations in French speaking kindergarden children. Journal of Speech, Hearing, and Language Research, 47, 87–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainela–Arnold, E., & Evans, J. L. (2005). Beyond capacity limitations: Determinants of word recall performance on verbal working memory span tasks in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 897–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2007). On-line processing of wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42 (5), 557–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marton, K. (2006). Do nonword repetition errors in children with specific language impairment reflect a weakness in an unidentified skill specific to nonword repetition or a deficit in simultaneous processing? Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 569–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masson, M. E. J. (1986). Comprehension of rapidly presented sentences: The mind is quicker than the eye. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 588–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, K., Ferretti, R. T., & Amyote, L. (1997). Thematic roles are verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 137–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C., Kail, R., Leonard, L., & Tomblin, B. (2001). Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 416–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, J. W. (2000). Relation of working memory to off-line and real-time sentence processing in children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J. W. (2002). Examining the nature of lexical processing in children with specific language impairment: Temporal processing or processing capacity deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, J. W. (2006). Real-time language processing in school-age children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41, 275–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, J. W., & Leonard, L. (1998). Real-time inflectional processing by children with specific language impairment: Effects of phonetic substance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1432–1443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, J. W., Scudder, R. R., & Moore, C. (1990). Language-impaired children's real time comprehension of spoken language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, H., & Blumstein, S. (2004). Deficit in thematic integration processes in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language, 88, 96–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novogrodsky, R., & Freidmann, N. (2006). The production of relative clauses in SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech–Language Pathology, 8, 364–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1989). The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 73–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Piñango, M. M., & Zurif, E. (2001). Semantic combinatorial operations in aphasic comprehension: Implications for the cortical localization of language. Brain and Language, 79, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piñango, M. M. (2000). Neurological underpinnings of binding relations. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of Germany, Marburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Pizzioli, F., & Schelstraete, M.-A. (2007). Lexical decision task in children with specific language impairment. Paper presented at the 31st Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Pizzioli, F., & Schelstraete, M.-A. (2008). The argument-structure complexity effect in children with specific language impairment: Evidence from the use of grammatical morphemes in French. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 706–721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pizzioli, F., & Schelstraete, M.-A. (2011). Children with specific language impairment: The effect of transitivity and sentence length in auditory comprehension. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 25, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C., Saffran, E. M., & Pate, D. S. (1987). Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, G. B., Peterson, R. R., Casteel, M. A., & Burgess, C. (1989). Lexical and sentence context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 88–97.Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L. (2009). Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. Internal Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. E., & Montgomery, J. W. (1995). Sentence processing in language impaired children under conditions of filtering and time compression. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S. (2001). Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language, 77, 419–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swaab, T., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1998). Understanding ambiguous words in sentence context: Electrophysiological evidence for a delayed contextual selection in Broca's aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 36, 737–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G., & Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structure in interpretation and parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H., & Battell, J. (2003). Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language, 79, 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H., & Dewart, H. (1986). Language comprehension strategies in specifically language impaired children. British Journal of Disorders and Communication, 21, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Lely, H., & Stollwerck, L. (1996). A grammatical specific language impairment in children: An autosomal dominant inheritance? Brain and Language, 52, 484–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Lely, H. K. J., & Harris, M. (1990). Comprehension of reversible sentences in specifically language impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1193–1207.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar