Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T12:24:38.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapid shift in naming efficiency on a rapid automatic naming task by young Spanish-speaking English language learners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

Stephanie McMillen*
Affiliation:
1Syracuse University
Linda Jarmulowicz
Affiliation:
2University of Memphis
Michael M. Mackay
Affiliation:
3Ball State University
D. Kimbrough Oller
Affiliation:
2University of Memphis
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The present study analyzed lexical processing efficiency in Spanish-speaking English language learners (ELLs) and their monolingual English-speaking peers from kindergarten through second grade. Specifically, changes in the patterns of speed and accuracy on a rapid object-naming task were evaluated across languages for the ELL children and across the groups of children. Repeated measures analysis of variance demonstrated that ELL children have a rapid shift in language processing efficiency from Spanish to English by the end of kindergarten. Results also showed that by the end of kindergarten ELL children were slightly faster and more accurate in English compared with their monolingual peers. This work provides perspective on how lexical processing is impacted by the development of a dual lexical system. We discuss how lexical density, strength of lexical connections, and environmental constraints may influence this rapid shift in lexical processing efficiency for young Spanish-speaking ELL children.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alario, F. X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 140155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araújo, S., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2015). Rapid automatized naming and reading performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 868883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., … Wicha, N. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 344380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Griffin, Z. M., & Hixon, J. G. (2016). Effects of age of English exposure, current input/output, and grade on bilingual language performance. Journal of Child Language, 43, 687706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E. (2007). Acquisition of literacy in bilingual children: A framework for research. Language Learning, 57, 4577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859873.Google ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Luk, G., & Kwan, E. (2005). Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 4361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 6985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomé, À., & Miozzo, M. (2010). Which words are activated during bilingual word production? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 96.Google ScholarPubMed
Compton, D. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language-specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 10571074.Google ScholarPubMed
Davies, M. (2009). The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 159190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2002). Un corpus anotado de 100.000. 000 palabras del español histórico y moderno. Procesamiento del lenguaje natural, 29, 21–27.Google Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2011). Phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming predicting early development in reading and spelling: Results from a cross-linguistic longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 8595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & Stephenson, K. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 325350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, T. A., Oller, D. K., Jarmulowicz, L., & Ethington, C. A. (2012). The receptive–expressive gap in the vocabulary of young second-language learners: Robustness and possible mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 102116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gildersleeve-Neumann, C. E., Kester, E. S., Davis, B. L., & Peña, E. D. (2008). English speech sound development in preschool-aged children from bilingual English–Spanish environments. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 314328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the frequency lag hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K. (2005). Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition, 33, 12201234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., & Werner, G. A. (2002). Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish-English bilinguals. Neuropsychology, 16, 562.10.1037/0894-4105.16.4.562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gollan, T. H., & Silverberg, N. B. (2001). Tip-of-the-tongue states in Hebrew–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, S., & Brinkley, S. (2011). Fast mapping and word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment in a supported learning context: Effect of encoding cues, phonotactic probability, and object familiarity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 870884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, S., Pittman, A., & Weinhold, J. (2014). Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 10111025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E., Burridge, A., Ribot, K. M., & Giguere, D. (2018). Language specificity in the relation of maternal education to bilingual children’s vocabulary growth. Developmental Psychology, 54, 10111019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100, 464482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohnert, K. (2002). Picture naming in early sequential bilinguals: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 759771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohnert, K. J., Bates, E., & Hernandez, A. E. (1999). Balancing bilinguals lexical-semantic production and cognitive processing in children learning Spanish and English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 14001413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20, 15071515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, K. A., Manis, F. R., & Bailey, C. E. (2003). Prediction of first-grade reading in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 482494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manis, F. R., Lindsey, K. A., & Bailey, C. E. (2004). Development of reading in grades K–2 in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 214224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V. A., Fernald, A., & Hurtado, N. (2010). How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals. Journal of Child Language, 37, 817840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillen, S., Griffin, Z. M., Peña, E. D., Bedore, L. M., & Oppenheim, G. M. (2020). “Did I say cherry?” Error patterns on a blocked cyclic naming task for bilingual children with and without developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63, 11481164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milenkovic, P. (2010). TF32 (Alpha). Madison, WI. http://userpages.chorus.net/cspeech/ Google Scholar
Nair, V. K., Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2017). Understanding bilingual word learning: The role of phonotactic probability and phonological neighborhood density. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 35513560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oller, D. K., Jarmulowicz, L., Gibson, T., Hoff, E., Caunt-Milton, H., Kulatilake, S., & Woo, I. (2007). First language vocabulary loss in early bilinguals during language immersion: A possible role for suppression. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (Vol. 2, pp. 474–484). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2017). Bilingual children’s long-term outcomes in English as a second language: Language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science, 20, e12433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., Palma, A., & Rho, C. (2000). Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, J. P. (2012). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storkel, H. L., Armbrüster, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 11751192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Auer, E.T. (1999). Phonotactics, neighborhood activation, and lexical access for spoken words. Brain and Language, 68, 306311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). CTOPP: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C., Bustamante, K., Fitton, L., Brown, D., & Petscher, Y. (2017). Rapid automatic naming performance of young Spanish–English speaking children. Languages, 2, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., (1991). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery—Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. (1995). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery–Revised, Spanish form. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar