Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T01:15:30.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The priming of word order in second language German

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

CARRIE N. JACKSON  and
HELENA T. RUF
CARRIE N. JACKSON*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
HELENA T. RUF
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Carrie N. Jackson, Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures, Pennsylvania State University, 442 Burrowes Building, University Park, PA 16802. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigates the priming and subsequent production of word order variation (adverb–verb–subject vs. subject–verb–adverb order) with temporal phrases (Experiment 1) and locative phrases (Experiment 2) among intermediate English–German second language learners. Participants exhibited comparable short-term priming for adverb-first word order in both experiments. In the initial baseline phase, participants produced adverb-first sentences with temporal phrases but not locative phrases, and only temporal phrases led to significant long-term priming, as measured in a postpriming phase. This suggests that at lower proficiency levels, long-term, but not short-term, priming may depend on the stability of specific semantically constrained constructions rather than more generalized syntactic representations and that such cumulative effects may be shaped by preferences for a particular construction in the native language.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 315 - 345
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernolet, S., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2010). Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming? Cognition, 114, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, 127, 287–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Onishi, K. H. (2007). Persistent structural priming from language comprehension to language production. Cognition, 104, 437–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohnacker, U., & Rosén, C. (2008). The clause-initial position in L2 German declaratives: Transfer of information structure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 511–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–B25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunger, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Event structure influences language production: Evidence from structural priming in motion event description. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 299–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callies, M., & Szczesniak, K. (2008). Argument realization, information status and syntactic weight—A learner-corpus study of the dative alternation. In Grommes, P. & Walter, M. (Eds.), Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten. Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung [Advanced learner varieties. Corpus linguistics and second language acquisition research] (pp. 165–187). Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., Murcia-Serra, J., Watorek, M., & Bendiscioli, A. (2000). The relevance of information organization to second language acquisition studies: The descriptive discourse of advanced adult learners of German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., von Stutterheim, C., & Klein, W. (2003). Two ways of construing complex temporal structures. In Lenz, F. (Ed.), Deictic conceptualization of time, space, and person (pp. 97–134). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K. J. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113, 234–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, B., Jia, Y., Wang, Z., Dunlap, S., & Shin, J.-A. (2013). Is word-order similarity necessary for cross-linguistic structural priming? Second Language Research, 29, 375–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S., & Chang, F. (2014). The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doherty, M. (2005). Topic-worthiness in German and English. Linguistics, 43, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drenhaus, H. (2004). Minimalism, features and parallel grammars: On the acquisition of German ditransitive structures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer Scaltz, T. R. (2008). Spanish-English L2 speakers’ use of subcategorization bias information in the resolution of temporary ambiguity during second language reading. Acta Psychologica, 128, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engel, U. (1974). Syntaktische Besonderheiten der deutschen Alltagssprache [Syntactic features of colloquial spoken German]. In H. Moser (Ed.), Gesprochene Sprach: Vol. 26. Jahrbuch 1972 Sprache der Gegenwart (pp. 199–228). Düsseldorf, Germany: Schwann.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferreira, V. S., & Bock, K. (2006). The functions of structural priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 1011–1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flett, S., Branigan, H. P., & Pickering, M. J. (2013). Are non-native structural preferences affected by native language preferences? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 751–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, C., & Flynn, S. (2013). The role of the native language. In Herschensohn, J. & Young-Sholten, M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gámez, P., & Vasilyeva, M. (2015). Increasing second language learners’ production and comprehension of developmentally advanced syntactic forms. Language Learning and Development, 11, 128–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerwien, J., & Flecken, M. (2015). There is no prime for time: The missing link between form and concept of progressive aspect in L2 production. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18, 561–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2005). Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 365–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, Z. M., & Weinstein-Tull, J. (2003). Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 537–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Bernolet, S. (2015). The development of shared syntax in second language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2008). Syntactic priming persists but the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 214–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Huiskamp, P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Pickering, M. J. (2008). Language integration in bilingual speech production. Acta Psychologica, 128, 479–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R. J., & Westenberg, C. (2000). Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition, 75, B27–B39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasselgård, H. (1996). Sentence openings in English and Norwegian. In Aarts, J., Meijs, W., & Ljung, M. (Eds.), Corpus-based studies in English: Papers from the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (pp. 3–20). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Helbig, G., & Buscha, J. (2001). Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch fur denAusländerunterricht [German grammar: A handbook for foreign language instruction]. Munich, Germany: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Ivanova, I., Pickering, M. J., McLean, J. F., Costa, A., & Branigan, H. (2012). How do people produce ungrammatical utterances? Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. N. (2012). The clause-initial position in oral production among English–German L2 learners. Paper presented at the 18th Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Jaeger, F. T. (2008). Categorical data analyses: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaeger, F. T., & Snider, N. E. (2013). Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, C. D., & Franzese, R. J. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Coyle, J. M. (2014). Long and short term cumulative priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 29, 728–743.Google Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Kutta, T. J., & Jones, J. L. (2011). Structural priming as implicit learning: Cumulative priming effects and individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 1133–1139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, E. K., Lu, D. H. Y., & Garnsey, S. M. (2013). L1 word order and sensitivity to verb bias in L2 processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 761–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liamkina, O. (2008). Making dative a case for semantic analysis: Differences in use between native and non-native speakers of German. In Tyler, A., Kim, Y., & Takada, M. (Eds.), Language in the context of use: Usage-based approaches to language and language learning (pp. 145–166). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovik, T. A., Guy, D. J., & Chavez, M. (2013). Vorsprung: A communicative introduction to German language and culture (3rd ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacWhinney, B. (2012). The logic of the unified model. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 211–227). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Malhotra, G., Pickering, M., Branigan, H., & Bednar, J. A. (2008). On the persistence of structural priming: Mechanisms of decay and influence of word-forms. In Love, B. C., McRae, K., & Sloutsky, V. M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 657–662). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS Repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In Mackey, A. & Marsden, E. (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS Repository of Instruments for Research into Second Languages (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Fulga, A. (2015). The detection and primed production of novel constructions. Language Learning, 65, 326–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2009). Using priming methods in second language research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meinunger, A. (2006). Remarks on the projection of dative arguments in German. In Abraham, W., Hole, D., & Meinunger, A. (Eds.), Datives and other cases: Between argument structure and event structure (pp. 79–101). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (2005). Crosslinguistic influence and conceptual transfer: What are the concepts? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, M., Chang, F., Pine, J. M., Blything, R., & Rowland, C. F. (2015). When and how do children develop knowledge of verb argument structure? Evidence from verb-bias effects in a structural priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 81, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psychology Software Tools. (2012). E-Prime 2.0. [computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com Google Scholar
Development Core Team, R. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna:: Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D. (2011). A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35, 587–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruf, H. T. (2011). An investigation of syntactic priming among German speakers at varying proficiency levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
Ruf, H. T., & Larson-Guenette, J. C. (2010). “Sounding more German”: The impact of study abroad on fronting tendencies. Paper presented at the 16th Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). A paradox of syntactic priming: Why response tendencies show priming for passives, and response latencies show priming for actives. PLOS ONE, 6, e24209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, J.-A., & Christianson, K. (2009). Syntactic processing in Korean–English bilingual production: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition, 12, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J.-A., & Christianson, K. (2012). Structural priming and second language acquisition. Language Learning, 62, 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2005). Syntactic optionality at interfaces. In Cornips, L. & Corrigan, K. (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 46–111). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event-related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Wisconsin Testing and Evaluation. (2006). German Language Placement Test. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. E., & Labov, W. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jackson and Ruf suppplementary material

Supplementary Tables

Download Jackson and Ruf suppplementary material(File)
File 21.5 KB