Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:39:56.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology. Ovid J. L. Tzeng & Harry Singer (Eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1981. Pp. ix + 311.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Frank R. Vellutino
Frank R. Vellutino
Affiliation:
State University at New York at Albany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 75 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Collins, A., & Loftus, E.A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 1975, 82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. The structure and acquisition of reading 1: Relations between orthographies and the structure of language. In Reber, A. S. & Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading–The proceedings of the CUNY conference. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.Google Scholar
Gough, P. B. One second of reading. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Mattingly, I. G. (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye: The relationships between speech and reading. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C., & Lewis, J.What does it mean to be high verbal? Cognitive Psychology, 1975, 7, 194–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, N. F. A pattern-unit model of word identification. In LaBerge, D. & Samuels, S. J. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
Lesgold, A. M., & Perfetti, C. A.Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1981.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. In Resnick, L. B. & Weaver, P. A. (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading, Volume 1. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B., & Weaver, P. A.Theory and practice of early reading. Volumes 1, 2 & 3. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.Google Scholar
Smith, E. E., & Spoehr, K. T. The perception of printed English: A theoretical perspective. In Kantowitz, B. H. (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1974.Google Scholar
Spoehr, K. T.Phonological encoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978, 17, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F. R.Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R. Theoretical issues in the study of word recognition: The unit of perception controversy reexamined. In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Handbook of applied psycholinguistics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1982.Google Scholar