Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:44:21.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2015

PAOLA ESCUDERO
PAOLA ESCUDERO*
Affiliation:
University of Western Sydney
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Paola Escudero, MARCS Institute, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South, Sydney, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some previous studies have shown that the availability of orthographic information leads to positive effects for second language (L2) phonology, while others document negative effects. In this paper, we examine the role of orthography on novel spoken-word learning by comparing word pairs that differed in most or all of their segments (nonminimal pairs) and those that only differed in one phoneme (minimal pairs) that was considered easy or difficult to discriminate. We tested the performance of learners whose native languages have transparent orthographies as well as learners with opaque orthographies. Our findings show that regardless of linguistic background and native orthographic system, availability of orthographic information during word learning did not have an effect on nonminimal pairs or perceptually easy minimal pairs. However, it had a positive effect on two minimal pairs that had the highest accuracy among the seven perceptually difficult ones, indicating that orthography only helped contrasts that were relatively easy to discriminate. The implications of these findings for L2 teaching and for future directions within L2 phonology are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 7 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, J. C., & Huhta, A. (2005). The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing, 22, 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alispahic, S., Escudero, P., & Mulak, K. (2014). Difficulty in discriminating non-native vowels: Are Dutch vowels easier for Australian English than Spanish listeners? Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /ɾ/ and English /l/ and /ɾ/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2007). Effects of hanyu pinyin on the pronunciation of learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In Guder, A., Jiang, X., & Wan, Y. (Eds.), The cognition, learning and teaching of Chinese characters (pp. 156–179). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B., & Atkinson, N. (2015). Effects of orthographic forms on pronunciation in experienced instructed second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 67–91.Google Scholar
Benders, T., Escudero, P., & Sjerps, M. (2012). The interrelation between acoustic context effects and available response categories in speech sound categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, 3079–3087.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O. S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Escudero, P. (2008). Learning to perceive a smaller L2 vowel inventory: An optimality theory account. In Avery, P., Dresher, E., & Rice, K. (Eds.), Contrast in phonology: Theory, perception, acquisition (pp. 271–301). Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Broersma, M. (2005). Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar position. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 3890–3901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, F. (2006). The acoustic characteristics of /hVd/ vowels in the speech of some Australian teenagers. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 26, 147–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (2015). Representation of second language phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 115–128.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Broersma, M. (2005). Phonetic precision in listening. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Beck, J. Mackenzie (Eds.), A figure of speech: A festschrift for John Laver (pp. 63–91). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Elvin, J., Escudero, P., & Vasiliev, P. (2014). Spanish is better than English for discriminating Portuguese vowels: Acoustic similarity versus vowel inventory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1188.Google Scholar
Erdener, V. D., & Burnham, D. K. (2005). The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning, 55, 191–228.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition (Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University). LOT Dissertation Series, 113.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. (2007). Second language phonology: The role of perception. In Pennington, M. (Ed.), Phonology in context (pp. 109–134). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. In Boersma, P. & Hamann, S. (Eds.), Phonology in perception (pp. 151–190). Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Lipski, S. (2009). Native, non-native and L2 perceptual cue weighting for Dutch vowels: The case of Dutch, German, and Spanish listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 452–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Benders, T., & Wanrooij, K. (2011). Enhanced vowel distributions facilitate adult L2 learning. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, EL206–EL212.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2002). The subset problem in L2 perceptual development: Multiple-category assimilation by Dutch learners of Spanish. In Skarabela, B., Fish, S., & Do, A. H.-J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 208–221). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Broersma, M., & Simon, E. (2013). Learning words in a third language: Effects of vowel inventory and language proficiency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 746–761.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 345–360.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., Simon, E., & Mulak, K. (2014). Learning words in a third language: Effects of vowel inventory and language proficiency. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 17, 384–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., & Wanrooij, K. (2010). The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech, 53, 343–365.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2011). Perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Peruvian Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129, EL1–EL7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2012). Native dialect influences L2 vowel perception: Peruvian versus Iberian Spanish learners of Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131, EL406–EL412.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Williams, D. (2014). Distributional learning has immediate and long-lasting effects. Cognition, 133, 408–413.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Cox, F., & Evans, Z. (1997). An acoustic phonetic study of broad, general, and cultivated Australian English vowels. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 17, 155–184.Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., & Barker, J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new-words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53, 367–381.Google Scholar
Showalter, C. E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29, 185–200.Google Scholar
Showalter, C. E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E., Chambless, D., & Alves, U. K. (2010). Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 32, 380–394.Google Scholar
van Leussen, J.-W., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2011). Acoustic properties of Dutch steady-state vowels: contextual effects and a comparison with previous studies. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Veivo, O., & Järvikivi, J. (2013). Proficiency modulates early orthographic and phonological processing in L2 spoken word recognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 864–883.Google Scholar
Wanrooij, K., Escudero, P., & Raijmakers, M. (2013). What do listeners learn from exposure to a vowel distributions? An analysis of listening strategies in distributional learning. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 307–319.Google Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 1–25.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M., & Langer, M. (2015). The role of orthographic input in second language German: Evidence from naturalistic adult learners’ production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 93–114.Google Scholar