Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:11:20.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orthographic mapping instruction to facilitate reading and spelling in Brazilian emergent readers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

RENAN DE ALMEIDA SARGIANI ,
LINNEA CARLSON EHRI  and
MARIA REGINA MALUF
RENAN DE ALMEIDA SARGIANI
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo
LINNEA CARLSON EHRI*
Affiliation:
Graduate Center of the City University of New York
MARIA REGINA MALUF
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Linnea C. Ehri, Program in Educational Psychology, CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment and a follow-up study were conducted with Brazilian Portuguese-speaking kindergartners (N =90), mean age 53 months, to examine whether emergent readers benefit more from instruction in orthographic mapping (OM) of phonemes than OM of syllables at the outset of learning to read and write, and whether the addition of articulatory gestures in the OM training of phonemes enhances the benefit. In the experiment, children received instruction in small groups in one of four conditions: OM of phonemes with letters and articulation (OMP+A); OM of phonemes with letters but no articulation (OMP); OM of syllables and their spellings (OMS); and no OM control. Results showed that the OMP+A group outperformed the others in phonemic segmentation, reading, and spelling. On literacy assessments 1.5 years later, only the OMP+A group remembered how to segment words into phonemes. We conclude that despite the greater salience and accessibility of syllables than phonemes in spoken Portuguese, teaching phonemic OM better prepares emergent readers to move into reading and spelling than teaching syllabic OM. Moreover, instruction that includes articulation as well as letters to segment words is especially effective. Results support a graphophonemic connectionist theory of emergent reading and spelling.

Keywords

learning to readlearning to spellorthographic mappingphonemic awarenessreading instructionsyllabic awareness
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 39 , Issue 6 , November 2018 , pp. 1405 - 1437
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alves-Martins, M., & Silva, C. (2006). The impact of invented spelling on phonemic awareness. Learning and Instruction, 16, 41–56.Google Scholar
Boyer, N., & Ehri, L. C. (2011). Contribution of phonemic segmentation instruction with letters and articulation pictures to word reading and spelling in beginners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 440–470.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E. (1998). Sensitivity to onset and rhyme does predict young children’s reading: A comment on Muter, Hulme, Snowling, and Taylor (1997). Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 29–37.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins, C. (1995). Sensitivity to rhymes, syllables, and phonemes in literacy acquisition in Portuguese. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 808–828.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins, C. (2013). Existe um estágio silábico no desenvolvimento da escrita em Português? Evidência de três estudos longitudinais. In M. R. Maluf & C. Cardoso-Martins (Eds.), Alfabetização no Século XXI: Como se Aprende a Ler e a Escrever. Porto Alegres, Brazil: Penso.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins, C., & Batista, A. C. E. (2005). O conhecimento do nome das letras e o desenvolvimento da escrita: Evidência de crianças falantes do português. Psicologia: Reflexão E Crítica, 18, 330–336.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins, C., Capovilla, F. C., Gombert, J.-É., Oliveira, J. B. A., & Morais, J. (2005). Os novos caminhos da alfabetização infantil (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Menon.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins, C., & Corrêa, M. F. (2008). O desenvolvimento da escrita nos anos pré-escolares: questões acerca do estágio silábico. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 24, 279–286.Google Scholar
Cardoso-Martins, C., Mesquita, T. C. L., & Ehri, L. C. (2011). Letter names and phonological awareness help children to learn letter-sound relations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 25–38.Google Scholar
Castiglioni-Spalten, M. L., & Ehri, L. C. (2003). Phonemic awareness instruction: Contribution of articulatory segmentation to novice beginners’ reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 25–52.Google Scholar
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77–111.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. A., & Bowey, J. A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime, grapheme–phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to teaching decoding skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 327–349.Google Scholar
Defior, S., Cary, L., & Martos, F. (2002). Differences in reading acquisition development in two shallow orthographies: Portuguese and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 135–148.Google Scholar
Degasperi, L., Micciolo, R., Espa, G., & Calzolari, S. (2011). Phonemic not syllabic awareness is linked to literacy in Italian children with Down syndrome. Journal of Pediatric Neurology, 9, 325–332.Google Scholar
de Melo, R. B., & Correa, J. (2013). Consciência fonológica e a aprendizagem da leitura e escrita por adultos. Estudos E Pesquisas Em Psicologia, 13, 460–479.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. G., Castro, S. L., Defior, S., Seymour, P. H. K., Baillie, S., Leybaert, J., … Serrano, F. (2013). Phonological development in relation to native language and literacy: Variations on a theme in six alphabetic orthographies. Cognition, 127, 398–419.Google Scholar
Duncan, L. G., Seymour, P. H. K., & Hill, S. (1997). How important are rhyme and analogy in beginning reading? Cognition, 63, 171–208.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–188.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 5–21.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. (2009). The transformation of children’s knowledge of language units during beginning and initial literacy. In J. V. Hoffman & Y. Goodman (Eds.), Changing literacies for changing times: An historical perspective on the future of research reading research, public policy, and classroom practices (pp. 61–75). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1999). Psicogênese da língua escrita. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Penso.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, C., Tolar, T. D., Reese, L., Francis, D. J., Bazan, A. R., & Mejia-Arauz, R. (2014). American Educational Research Journal, 51, 604–633.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (1988). Children’s use of analogy in learning to spell. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 21–33.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (1990). A special link between rhyming skill and the use of orthographic analogies by beginning readers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 301–311.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Hatcher, P. J., Nation, K., Brown, A., Adams, J., & Stuart, G. (2002). Phoneme awareness is a better predictor of early reading skill than onset-rime awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 2–28.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M. (1999). The reading researcher and the reading teacher need the right theory of speech. Scientific American, 3, 95–111.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.Google Scholar
Lindamood, C., & Lindamood, P. (1975), The A.D.D. Program: Auditory Discrimination in Depth. Austin, TX; Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Maluf, M. R., & Sargiani, R. A. (2014). Aprendendo a ler e a escrever em português brasileiro: Contribuições de pesquisas de avaliação e intervenção experimental. In J. P. de Oliveira, T. M. S. Braga, F. L. P. Viana, & A. S. Santos (Eds.), Alfabetização em países de língua portuguesa: Pesquisa e intervenção (pp. 11–26). Curitiba: CRV.Google Scholar
Mateus, M. H., & D’Andrade, E. (2000). The phonology of Portuguese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morais, J. (1991). Constraints on the development of phonemic awareness. In S. A. Brady & D. P. Shankweiler (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y Liberman (pp. 5–28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mousinho, R., & Correa, J. (2009). Habilidades lingüístico-cognitivas em leitores e não-leitores. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica, 21, 113–118.Google Scholar
National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel . Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication 004754). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 1–17.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–214). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, A. M. V. (1996). Contagem de freqüência de ocorrência e análise psicolinguísticas de palavras expostas a crianças na faixa pré-escolar e séries iniciais do 1° grau. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Dislexia.Google Scholar
Pollo, T. C., Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2005). Vowels, syllables, and letter names: Differences between young children’s spelling in English and Portuguese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 161–181.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science, 2(2 Suppl.), 31–74.Google Scholar
Sargiani, R. A., & Albuquerque, A. (2016). Análise das Estratégias de Escrita de Crianças Pré-Escolares em Português do Brasil. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 20, 591–600. doi:10.1590/2175-3539201502031057 Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K. (2005). Early reading development in European orthographies. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 296–315). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., & Duncan, L. G. (1997). Small versus large unit theories of reading acquisition. Dyslexia, 3, 125–134.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008a). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2008b). Orthographic learning, phonology and the self-teaching hypothesis. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 31–82). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Siccherino, L. A. F. (2013). Primeiras Fases da Alfabetização: Como a Intervenção em Consciência Fonêmica Ajuda as Crianças na Aprendizagem Inicial da Leitura. Unpublished manuscript, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Soares, M. B. (2016). Alfabetização: A questão dos métodos. São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2003). Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 1–28.Google Scholar
Spinillo, A. G., Maria, M., Elia, P., & Correa, J. (2010). Consciência metalinguística e compreensão de leitura: Diferentes facetas de uma relação complexa. Educar, 38, 157–171.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161–181.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Pollo, T. C., Cardoso-Martins, C., & Kessler, B. (2013). Do young children spell words syllabically? Evidence from learners of Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 157–162.Google Scholar
Twist, J. (2004). Beginning literacy: The small-unit versus large-unit debate continues. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 13, 205–224.Google Scholar
Uhry, J., & Ehri, L. (1999). Ease of segmenting two- and three-phoneme words in kindergarten: Rime cohesion or vowel salience? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 594–603.Google Scholar
Vale, A. P. (2006). Aprender a ler em Português: O tamanho das unidades usadas na descodificação. In Actas do 6 o Encontro Nacional (4 o Internacional) de Investigação em Leitura, Literatura Infantil e Ilustração (pp. 1–12). Braga: Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
Vale, A. P. (2011). Orthographic context sensitivity in vowel decoding by Portuguese monolingual and Portuguese–English bilingual children. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 43–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01482.x Google Scholar
Vale, A. P., & Bertelli, R. (2001). Brincar com rimas no jardim de infância e divertido, mas. In 1 o Encontro de Educadores de Infância, Açores, Portugal. Açores. Retrieved from http://home.utad.pt/~ple/content/divulgacao/textosDivulgacao/brincarComRimas.pdf Google Scholar
Vale, A. P., & Bertelli, R. (2006). A flexibilidade de utilização de diferentes unidades ortográficas na leitura em língua portuguesa. Psicologia, Educação E Cultura, 10.Google Scholar
Vernon, S. A., & Ferreiro, E. (1999). Writing development: A neglected variable in the consideration of phonological awareness. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 395–415.Google Scholar
Weisz, T. (2004). Didática da Leitura e da Escrita: Questões polêmicas. Pátio . Revista Pedagógica, 28, 57–62.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.Google Scholar
Wise, B., Ring, J., & Olson, R. (1999). Training phonological awareness with and without explicit attention to articulation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 271–304.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.Google Scholar