Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:45:35.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The onset of comprehension and production in a language delayed child

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Deborah Gibson  and
David Ingram
Deborah Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia
David Ingram*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of British Columbia
*
Dr David Ingram, Department of Linguistics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1W5, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the onset and acquisition of language comprehension and production in a language delayed child through the analysis of a daily diary kept from 2;5 to 3;10, in order to determine whether such data might contribute to our understanding of normal language development. The onset of both comprehension and production was substantially delayed, yet both underwent word spurts that approximated the normal rate of acquisition. The gap between comprehension and production was also greater than that found in normal children. The existence of the normal spurts was interpreted as indicating biologically determined milestones that are vital in the acquisition process. It is suggested that clinical intervention should set these milestones as goals of therapy.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1983 , pp. 359 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, H.Early lexical development: comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language. 1979, 6, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrigan, R.Language development as related to stage 6 object permanence development. Journal of Child Language, 1978, 5, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, P., Cook, N., & Goldstein, H. Pragmatics and symbolic play – A study in language and cognitive development. In Dale, P. and Ingram, D. (Eds.) Child language – An international perspective. Baltimore, Md.: University Park Press, 1981, pp. 151–173.Google Scholar
Gesell, A., Thompson, H., & Amatruda, C.Infant behavior: Its genesis and growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.Learning to mean. London: Edward Arnold, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. Sensori-motor intelligence and language development. In Lock, A. (Ed.) Action, gesture and symbol. London: Academic Press, 1978, pp. 261–290.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. The language disordered child. In Lass, N., McReynolds, L., Northern, J., and Yoder, D. (Eds.) Speech, language and hearing. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, in press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. The nature of specific language impairment in children. In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.) Handbook of applied psycholinguistics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1982, pp. 295–327.Google Scholar
Morehead, D., & Ingram, D.The development of base syntax in normal and linguistically deviant children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1973, 16, 330–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K.Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1973, 38. no. 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nice, M. M.A child who would not talk. Pedagogical Seminary, 1925, 32, 105–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B.The Psychology of the Child. New York: Basic Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S. Disorders of first language development: Trends in research and theory. In Gollin, E. S. (Ed.) Malformations of development: Biological and psychological sources and consequences. New York: Academic Press, 1984.Google Scholar