Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:11:50.129Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the development of narrative structure in child L1 and adult L2 acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Sven Strömqvist  and
Dennis Day
Sven Strömqvist*
Affiliation:
University of Göteborg.
Dennis Day*
Affiliation:
University of Göteborg.
*
Sven Strömqvist, Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg, 412 98 Göteborg, Sweden
Sven Strömqvist, Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg, 412 98 Göteborg, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study investigates the development of grammatical aspects of narrative structure in child L1 and adult L2 acquisition in a comparative perspective. The narratives were elicited through a picture story task. In the theoretical part of the study, this task is analyzed in semantic and psycholinguistic terms. In the empirical part of the study, it is demonstrated that narratives relating to an early phase of adult L2 acquisition show strong global cohesion, whereas narratives by child L1 learners tend to have very weak cohesion up to around 5 years of age. In a second developmental phase, however, the situation is observed to be the reverse: whereas child L1 learners become very much concerned with narrative structure and accomplish very strong cohesion, adult L2 learners tend to experience a dip in performance. The observed developmental asymmetry is interpreted as indicative of a difference in cognitive resources and sociocommunicative skills between the two types of learners.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 135 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersson, A.-B., & Strömqvist, S. (1990). Adult L2 acquisition of gender - A cross-linguistic and cross-learner type perspective. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 61.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1961). Truth. In Urmson, J. O. & Warnock, G. J. (Eds.), Philosophical papers (pp. 85–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. (1978). Is there a natural sequence in adult second language learning? In Hatch, E. M. (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 362–370). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1986). A functional approach to the acquisition of anaphoric relationships. Linguistics, 24, 227–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1987). The acquisition of narratives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. (1988). On the ability to relate events in narrative. Discourse Processes, 11, 469–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhardwaj, M., Dietrich, R., & Noyau, C. (Eds.). (1988). Temporality. Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: Final report vol. 5. Nijmegen, Holland: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1974). Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Extra, G., Strömqvist, S., & Broeder, P. (1988). Pronominal reference to person in adult language acquisition. In Broeder, P.Extra, G.van Hout, R.. Strömqvist, S., & Voionmaa, K. (Eds.), Processes in the developing lexicon (pp. 86–113). Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: Final report vol. 1. Tilburg, Holland: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1981). The grammatical marking of thematic structure in the development of language production. In Deutsch, W. (Ed.), The child's construction of language (pp. 121–147). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1983). Language development as a problem-solving process. Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 22, 1–22.Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (Eds.). (1988). Utterance structure. Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: Final report vol. 6. Nijmegen, Holland: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In Labov, W. (Ed.), Language in the inner city (pp. 354–396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In Helm, J. (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1981). The speaker's linearization problem. In Longuet-Higgins, H. C.Lyons, J., & Broadbent, D. E. (Eds.), The psychological mechanisms of language (pp. 91–101). London: The Royal Society and the British Academy.Google Scholar
Long, M. (1988). Maturational constraints on language development. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in English as a Second Language, 7 (1), 1–53.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., Levy, E., & Tyler, L. (1982). Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. In Jarvella, R. J. & Klein, W. (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 339–378). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
McGrann, W., & Schwartz, A. (1988). Main character in children's narratives. Linguistics, 26, 215–233.Google Scholar
Moen, I. (1983). Konduksjonsafasi. En fonologisk analyse av spontantalen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Dept. of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1990). From rote learning to system building (CRL Technical Report 9020). Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1984). Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics, 22, 779–809.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics. Auckland: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (Ed.). (1985). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vols. 1, 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1990, 07). Learning to think for speaking: Native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Plenary address at the Fifth International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Budapest.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S. (1989). Chaotic phases in adult second language acquisition - Evidence from speech planning and monitoring phenomena. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 57.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Allwood, J. (1985). Ecology of adult language acquisition - A psycholinguists research project. Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism, 5, 40–52.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and action. New York: Humanities PressGoogle Scholar