Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:11:39.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological awareness in dyslexic university students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2013

JENNIFER MARTIN ,
ULI H. FRAUENFELDER  and
PASCALE COLÉ
JENNIFER MARTIN*
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
ULI H. FRAUENFELDER
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
PASCALE COLÉ
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Jennifer Martin, Experimental Psycholinguistics Laboratory, University of Geneva, Boulevard du Pont d'Arve, 40 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research assessed phonological and morphological awareness in dyslexic university students. We tested 44 dyslexic university students in phonological and morphological awareness tasks and compared their performances to those of both matched chronological age and matched reading level controls. In the phonological awareness tests, the dyslexic university students performed at the same level as their reading level controls. In contrast, they systematically outperformed their reading level controls in the morphological awareness tasks and almost reached the proficiency level of the chronological age controls. The results show that dyslexic university students develop their morphological awareness more than their phonological awareness. These findings add to the evidence indicating that morphological awareness is not deficient in dyslexia and could instead play a beneficial role in the development of literacy skills in this population.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 1213 - 1233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Pollatsek, A., & Scarpati, S. (1991). Word identification in isolation and in context by college dyslexic students. Brain and Language, 40, 471–490.Google Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Nagy, W., & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 39, 141–163.Google Scholar
Bogliotti, C., Serniclaes, W., Messaoud-Galusi, S., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2008). Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: Comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101, 137–155.Google Scholar
Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 26B, 211–252.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1990). Word-recognition skills of adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 26, 439–454.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics’ phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition and component phonological processing skills of adults with childhood diagnosis of dyslexia. Developmental Review, 13, 258–268.Google Scholar
Bryant, P. E., & Bradley, L. (1985). Children's reading problems: Psychology and education. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Burani, C., Marcolini, S., De Luca, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2008). Morpheme-based reading aloud: Evidence from dyslexic and skilled Italian readers. Cognition, 108, 243–262.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In Feldman, L. B. (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 239–253.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249–274.Google Scholar
Casalis, S., & Colé, P. (2009). On the relationship between morphological and phonological awareness: Effects of training in kindergarten and in first-grade reading. First Language, 29, 113–142.Google Scholar
Casalis, S., Colé, P., & Sopo, D. (2004). Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 114–138.Google Scholar
Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M.-F. (2000). Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 12, 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casalis, S., Mathiot, E., Bécavin, A. S., & Colé, P. (2003). Conscience morphologique chez des lecteurs tout venant et en difficultés. Silexicales, 3, 57–66.Google Scholar
Champion, A. (1997). Knowledge of suffixed words: A comparison of reading disabled and nondisabled readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 29–55.Google Scholar
Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L. S., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults. Reading and Writing, 15, 73–107.Google Scholar
Colé, P., Royer, C., Leuwers, C., & Casalis, S. (2004). Les connaissances morphologiques dérivationnelles et l'apprentissage de la lecture chez l'apprenti-lecteur français du CP au CE2. L'Année Psychologique, 104, 701–750.Google Scholar
Deacon, S., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.Google Scholar
Deacon, S., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). Processing of derived forms in high-functioning dyslexics. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deacon, S., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength or weakness? In Reid, G., Fawcett, A., Manis, F., & Siegel, L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 212–237). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. E., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In Feldman, Laurie Beth (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1995). Hierarchical data modeling in the social sciences. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 201–204.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. P., & Ahn, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208.Google Scholar
Horn, L. J., & Berktold, J. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes (Report No. NCES 1999–187). Washington, DC: Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
INSERM (Ed.). (2007). Dyslexie, dysorthographie, dyscalculie: Bilan des données scientifiques. Paris: Editions INSERM.Google Scholar
Jaffré, J.-P. (2006). Pourquoi distinguer les homophones? Langue Française, 151, 25–40.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. R., Derochers, A., Roth, L., & Lai, S.V.S. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology, 49, 103–110.Google Scholar
Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l'Alouette. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
Lefavrais, P. (2005). Test de l'Alouette Révisé. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.Google Scholar
Leong, C. K. (1999). Phonological and morphological processing in adult students with learning/reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 224–238.Google Scholar
Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing, 12, 191–218.Google Scholar
Martin, J., Colé, P., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., Zorman, M., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2010). Reading in French-speaking adults with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 238–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller-Shaul, S. (2005). The characteristics of young and adult dyslexics readers on reading and reading-related cognitive tasks as compared to normal readers. Dyslexia, 11, 132–151.Google Scholar
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681.Google Scholar
Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'année psychologique, 101, 447–462.Google Scholar
Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Dean, P. (2001). Developmental dyslexia: The cerebellar deficit hypothesis. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 508–511.Google Scholar
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 151–174.Google Scholar
Peereman, R., Lété, B., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2007). Manulex-infra: Distributional characteristics of grapheme–phoneme mappings, and infralexical and lexical units in child-directed written material. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 156–166.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., van Orden, G. C., Smith, S. D., Green, P. A., & Haith, M. M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics. Child Development, 61, 1753–1778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008). Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 413–425.Google Scholar
Rasbash, J., & Goldstein, H. (1994). Efficient analysis of mixed hierarchical and cross-classified random structures using a multilevel model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 337–350.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.Google Scholar
Raven, J., & Court, J. (1995). Standard Progressive Matrices Series A, B, C, D, E (Révision 1956). Paris: Editions techniques et psychotechniques.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J., & Raven, J. (1998). Progressives Matrices Couleur. Paris: EAP.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2007). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: Author.Google Scholar
Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113.Google Scholar
Rubin, H., Patterson, P. A., & Kantor, M. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A. E., Liberman, A. M., Brady, S. A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6, 149–156.Google Scholar
Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing, 12, 219–252.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 37–46.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Béchennec, D., & Kipffer-Piquard, A. (2005). Lecture et compétences reliées: Données normatives pour la fin de la 1ère, 2nde, 3ème et 4ème année du primaire issues d'une nouvelle batterie de tests, EVALEC. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Europeenne de Psychologie Appliquee, 55, 157–186.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Kipffer-Piquard, A., Pinton, F., & Billard, C. (2009). Reliability and prevalence of an atypical development of phonological skills in French-speaking dyslexics. Reading and Writing, 22, 811–842.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., & Serniclaes, W. (2006). Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia (essays in developmental psychology). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stein, J. (2001). The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 12–36.Google Scholar
Szenkovits, G., & Ramus, F. (2005). Exploring dyslexics’ phonological deficit I: Lexical vs sub-lexical and input vs output processes. Dyslexia, 11, 253–268.Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Language and reading: Some perceptual prerequisites. Annals of Dyslexia, 30, 170–178.Google Scholar
Temple, E., Poldrack, R. A., Protopapas, A., Nagarajan, S., Salz, T., Tallal, P., et al. (2000). Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli in dyslexia: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 13907–13912.Google Scholar
Tractenberg, R. E. (2002). Exploring hypotheses about phonological awareness, memory, and reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsesmeli, S., & Seymour, P. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 19, 587–625.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Spearing, D. (1995). Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 76–123.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 80–90.Google Scholar
Wolter, J. A., Wood, A., & D'Zatko, K. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 286–298.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 107, 151–178.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2009). Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia. Developmental Science, 15, 732–745.Google Scholar