Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:21:16.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metaphor in using and understanding euphemism and dysphemism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Kerry L. Pfaff ,
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr  and
Michael D. Johnson
Kerry L. Pfaff
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Raymond W. Gibbs Jr*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael D. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
*
Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Six experiments examined the role of metaphorical knowledge in people's use and understanding of euphemisms and offensive expressions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that familiar euphemisms and dysphemisms are viewed as more appropriate and are easier to comprehend when there is a conceptual match between them and the context. The data from Experiments 3 and 4 showed a similar pattern for novel euphemisms and offensive phrases. Experiments 5 and 6 ruled out the hypothesis that the previous results were due to semantic priming. The findings from these experiments indicate that people's metaphorical conceptualization of a certain topic can influence the processing time and appropriate use of euphemistic and dysphemistic expressions.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 59 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1980). Language as a loaded weapon. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. (1985). An outline history of euphemisms in English. In Enright, D. J. (Ed.), Fair of speech: The uses of euphemism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1984). Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognitive Science, 8, 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1989). Understanding literal meaning. Cognitive Science, 13, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Brown, M., & McGlone, M. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 21, 711–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. (1985). Euphemisms in Greece and Rome. In Enright, D. J. (Ed.), Fair of speech: The uses of euphemism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors vie live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Munro, P. (1989). Slang U.: The official dictionary of college slang. New York: CrownGoogle Scholar
Nayak, N., & Gibbs, R. (1990). Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neaman, J. S., & Silver, C. G. (1983). Kind words: A thesaurus of euphemisms. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. (1981). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, H. (1981). A dictionary of euphemisms and other doubletalk. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarPubMed
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar