Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T17:44:12.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A longitudinal study of basic auditory processing and phonological skills in children with low IQ

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

SARAH KUPPEN ,
MARTINA HUSS  and
USHA GOSWAMI
SARAH KUPPEN*
Affiliation:
Anglia Ruskin University
MARTINA HUSS
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
USHA GOSWAMI
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Sarah Kuppen, Department of Psychology, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, United Kindgom. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here we report a longitudinal follow-up of 103 children with low or typical IQ and good or poor word reading, first studied by Kuppen, Huss, Fosker, Mead, and Goswami (2011). Our current goal was to explore whether different basic auditory processing measures taken 14 months previously would predict development in word reading and phonology in this sample. We also assessed the stability over time for the associations among basic auditory processing, phonology, and reading reported by Kuppen et al. (2011) for low IQ readers. The auditory processing measures showed significant longitudinal relations with both reading and phonology, and associations between the measures were largely stable over time. The data suggest that basic auditory processing skills and phonological skills, rather than IQ, determine a child's progress in word reading, throwing light on the fundamental biological mechanisms that determine reading development. Children with low IQ and poor reading should thus be treated in the same way as children with an IQ-discrepancy defined reading disability, both in research studies and in terms of gaining access to targeted remediation.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 1109 - 1141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banai, K., & Ahissar, M. (2004). Poor frequency discrimination probes dyslexics with particularly impaired working memory. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 9, 328–40.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M., & Yekutieli, D. (2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491–507.Google Scholar
Burkard, M., & Sachs, R. (1975). Anthropometic manikin for acoustic research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58, 214–222.Google Scholar
Corriveau, K., Goswami, U., & Thomson, J. (2010). Auditory processing and early literacy skills in a preschool and kindergarten population. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 369–382.Google Scholar
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (2001). What reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1, 137–149.Google Scholar
De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2002). Statistical analysis of similarity relations among spoken words: The special status or rimes in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 416–423.Google Scholar
Drullman, R. (2006). The significance of temporal modulation frequencies for speech intelligibility. In Greenberg, S. & Ainsworth, W. (Eds.), Listening to speech—An auditory perspective (pp. 39–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). British Picture Vocabulary Scale. London: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Elliott, C., Smith, P., & McCullouch, K. (1996). British Ability Scales (2nd ed.) Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Elliott, J., & Gibbs, S. (2008). Does dyslexia exist? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42, 475.Google Scholar
Ferrer, E., Shaywitz, B., Holahan, J., Marchione, K., & Shaywitz, S. (2010). Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: Empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 21, 93–101.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J., Francis, D., Rourke, B., Shaywitz, S., & Shaywitz, B. (1992). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 555–561.Google Scholar
Goswami, U. (2011). A temporal sampling framework for developmental dyslexia. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 3–10.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Fosker, T., Huss, M., Mead, N., & Szűcs, D. (2011). Rise time and formant transition duration in the discrimination of speech sounds: The Ba-Wa distinction in developmental dyslexia. Developmental Science, 14, 34–43.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gerson, D., & Astruc, L. (2010). Amplitude envelope perception, phonology and prosodic sensitivity in children with developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 23, 995–1019.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Huss, M., Mead, N., Fosker, T., & Verney, J. P. (2012). Perception of patterns of musical beat distribution in phonological developmental dyslexia: Significant longitudinal relations with word reading and reading comprehension. Cortex. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.5.005Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Wang, H. L. S., Cruz, A., Fosker, T., Mead, N., & Huss, M. (2011). Language-universal deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish and Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 325–337.Google Scholar
Greenberg, S., Arai, T., & Grant, K. (2003). The role of temporal dynamics in understanding spoken language. In Divenyi, P., Vicsi, K., & Meyer, G. (Eds.), Dynamics of speech production and perception (pp. 171–192). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, L., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). Auditory frequency discrimination in children with dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 213–228.Google Scholar
Hämäläinen, J. A., Leppänen, P. H. T., Guttorm, T. K., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Event-related potentials to pitch and rise time change in children with reading disabilities and typically reading children. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 100–115.Google Scholar
Hämäläinen, J. A., Salminen, H. K., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2012). Basic auditory processing deficits in dyslexia: Systematic review of the behavioural and event-related potential/field evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219411436213Google Scholar
Harlaar, N., Hayiou-Thomas, M., Dale, P., & Plomin, R. (2008). Why do preschool language abilities correlate with later reading? A Twin Study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 688–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, D. (1988). Speaking and writing: Distinct patterns of word choice. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 572–585.Google Scholar
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 393–402.Google Scholar
Hoequist, C. (1983). Syllable duration in stress-syllable and mora-timed languages. Phonetica, 40, 203–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuppen, S. (2010). Basic auditory processing skills and phonological awareness in low IQ good and poor readers and typically-developing controls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kuppen, S., Huss, M., Fosker, T., Mead, N., & Goswami, U. (2011). Basic auditory processing skills and phonological awareness in low-IQ readers and typically-developing controls. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 211–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. R., Ferguson, M. A., Edmondson-Jones, A. M., Ratib, S., & Riley, A. (2010). Nature of auditory processing disorder in children. Pediatrics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1542/peds.2009–2826Google Scholar
Muneaux, M., Ziegler, J. C., Truc, C., Thomson, J., & Goswami, U. (2004). Deficits in beat perception and dyslexia: Evidence from French. NeuroReport, 15, 1255.Google Scholar
Poelmans, H., Luts, H., Vandermosten, M., Boets, B., Ghesquiere, P., & Wouters, J. (2011). Reduced sensitivity to slow-rate dynamic auditory information in children with dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10:1016/j.ridd.2011.05.025Google Scholar
Poeppel, D., Idsardi, W. J., & Van Wassenhove, V. (2008). Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, 363, 1071–1086.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Pidgeon, E., & Frith, U. (2003). The relationship between motor control and phonology in dyslexic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 5, 712–722.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., White, S., & Frith, U. (2006). Weighing the evidence between competing theories of dyslexia. Developmental Science, 9, 265–269.Google Scholar
Richardson, U., Thomson, J., Scott, S., & Goswami, U. (2004). Auditory processing skills and phonological representation in dyslexic children. Dyslexia, 233, 215–233.Google Scholar
Rodgers, B. (1983). The identification and prevalence of specific reading retardation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 369–373.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16, 181–197.Google Scholar
Sattler, . (1981). Assessment of children's intelligence and special abilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Scott, S. (1998). The point of P-centres. Psychological Research, 61, 4–11.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.Google Scholar
Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.Google Scholar
Share, D., McGee, R., McKenzie, D., Williams, S., & Silva, P. (1987). Further evidence relating to the distinction between specific reading retardation and general reading backwardness. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaywitz, S., Escobar, M., Shaywitz, B., Fletcher, J., & Makuch, R. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 145–150.Google Scholar
Siegel, L. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. (2008). Specific disorders and broader phenotypes: The case of dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 142–156.Google Scholar
Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (2005). Learning to reading with a language impairment. In Snowling, M. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 379–412). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The Phonological-Core Variable-Difference Model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–604.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1998). Refining the Phonological Core Deficit Model. Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 3, 17–21.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350–361.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K., Nathan, R., & Zolman, J. (1988). The developmental lag hypothesis in reading: Longitudinal and matched reading-level comparisons. Child Development, 59, 71–86.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24–53.Google Scholar
Surányi, Z., Csépe, V., Richardson, U., Thomson, J., Honbolygó, F., & Goswami, U. (2008). Sensitivity to rhythmic parameters in dyslexic children: A comparison of Hungarian and English. Reading and Writing, 22, 41–56.Google Scholar
Thomson, J., & Goswami, U. (2008). Rhythmic processing in children with developmental dyslexia: Auditory and motor rhythms link to reading and spelling. Journal of Physiology–Paris, 102, 120–129.Google Scholar
Thomson, J., Richardson, U., & Goswami, U. (2005). Phonological similarity neighborhoods and children's short-term memory: Typical development and dyslexia. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1210–1219.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J., Rashotte, C., & Wagner, R. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Van der Wissel, A., & Zegers, F. (1985). Reading retardation revisited. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 3–9.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F., Fletcher, J., Snowling, M., & Scanlon, D. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40.Google Scholar
Wang, H. S., Huss, M., Hämäläinen, J. A., & Goswami, U. (2010). Basic auditory processing and developmental dyslexia in Chinese. Reading and Writing. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9284-5Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1992). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wong, B. (1989). Concluding comments on the special series on the place of IQ in defining learning disabilities, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 519–520.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed