Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:38:16.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lexical retrieval: The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Susan E. Kohn ,
Arthur Wingfield ,
Lise Menn ,
Harold Goodglass ,
Jean Berko Gleason  and
Mary Hyde
Susan E. Kohn
Affiliation:
Boston VA Medical Center and Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine
Arthur Wingfield
Affiliation:
Boston VA Medical Center and Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine
Lise Menn
Affiliation:
Boston VA Medical Center and Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine
Harold Goodglass*
Affiliation:
Boston VA Medical Center and Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine
Jean Berko Gleason
Affiliation:
Boston VA Medical Center and Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine
Mary Hyde
Affiliation:
Boston VA Medical Center and Aphasia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine
*
Harold Goodglass, Aphasia Research Center, 150 S. Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02130
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experiment is reported in which university undergraduates were given word definitions and asked to say aloud all responses that came to mind in the course of their attempts to retrieve the target words. Results showed that phonologically similar responses and word-fragments are good predictors of target word knowledge and the likelihood of eventual success in retrieval. Responses which were semantically related to the target word were less predictive of eventual success. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for interpreting tip-of-the-tongue analyses as a “window” on the process of word retrieval.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 245 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. W., Miller, D., & Sin, G. (1983). Wernicke's aphasia and normal language processing: A case study in cognitive neuropsychology. Cognition, 15, 111–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1893). The principles of psychology. Vol. I. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Koriat, A., & Lieblich, I. (1974). What does a person in a “TOT” state know that a person in a “don't know” state doesn't know? Memory and Cognition, 2, 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A., & Lieblich, I. (1975). Examination of the letter serial position effect in the “TOT” and the “don't know” state. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 539–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H. (1959). The categories and types of present day English word formation. University, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Pease, D., & Goodglass, H. (1978). The effects of cuing on picture naming in aphasia. Cortex, 14, 178–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D. C. (1975). Within word structure in the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 392–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widlöf, I. (1983). Lexical access: Evidence from the TOT phenomenon. Undergraduate project dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar