Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:59:25.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intrusion of orthographic knowledge on phoneme awareness: Strong in normal readers, weak in dyslexic readers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Karin Landerl ,
Uta Frith  and
Heinz Wimmer
Karin Landerl*
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg
Uta Frith
Affiliation:
MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London
Heinz Wimmer
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg
*
Karin Landerl, Department of Psychology,University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In three typical phonological awareness tasks it was found that children with normal reading development sometimes give responses that are based on orthographic rather than phonological information. In dyslexic children, the number of occurrences of such orthographic intrusions was significantly lower. This effect cannot be explained by positing a lower degree of orthographic knowledge in dyslexic children since a group of younger children who had the same spelling level as the dyslexics also showed more orthographic intrusions. A plausible explanation for this difference between normal and dyslexic readers is that, in normal readers, phonological and orthographic representations of words are so closely connected that they are usually coactivated, even if such a coactivation is misleading. In dyslexics this connection is less strong, so that orthographic representations interfere less with phonemic segmentation. The relevance of this finding with respect to recent assumptions about the importance of phonology in establishing orthographic representations is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barron, R. W. (1994, 10). Proto-literate knowledge: Antecedents and influences on phonological awareness and literacy. Paper presented at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Advanced Study Institute: Cognitive and linguistic bases of reading, writing, and spelling. Alvor, Portugal.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading backwardness. Nature, 271, 746–747.Google Scholar
Bruce, D. J. (1964). The analysis of word sounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 158–170.Google Scholar
Bruck, M. (1992). Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Developmental Psychology, 28, 874–886.Google Scholar
Campbell, R., & Butterworth, B. (1985). Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in a highly literate subject: A developmental case with associated deficits of phonemic processing and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 435–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1981). Multiple codeactivation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 170–180.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In Downing, J. & Valtin, R. (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119–147). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C., & Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. & Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers' reconceptualisation of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371–385.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1982). The salience of silent letters in children's memory for word spellings. Memory and Cognition, 104, 155–166.Google Scholar
Elliot, C. D. (1992). British Ability Scales: Spelling Scale. Windsor, Berkshire: NFERNELSON.Google Scholar
Elliot, C. D., Murray, D. J., & Pearson, L. S. (1983). British Ability Scales: Word Reading. Windsor, Berkshire: NFER-NELSON.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C., & Fischer, F. W. (1977). Phonetic segmentation and recoding in the beginning reader. In Reber, A. S. & Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Towards a psychology of reading (pp. 207–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Manis, F. R., Szeszulski, P. A., Holt, L. K., & Graves, K. (1988). A developmental perspective on dyslexia subtypes. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 139–153.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously?. Cognition, 7, 323–331.Google Scholar
Olson, R., Wise, B., Connors, F., & Rack, J. (1990). Organisation, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers. In Carr, T. & Levy, B. A. (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 261–322). London: Academic.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F., Van, Orden G. C., Smith, S. D., Green, P. A., & Haith, M. M. (1990). Phonological processing skills and deficits in adult dyslexics. Child Development, 61, 1753–1778.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In Gough, P. B., Ehri, L. C.,& Treiman, R. (Eds.), Reading aquisit ion (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Perin, D. (1983). Phonemic segmentation and spelling. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 129–144.Google Scholar
Rack, J., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Wightman, J. (1994). The role of phonology in young children learning to read words: The direct mapping hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 42–71.Google Scholar
Rack, J. P. (1985). Orthographic and phonetic coding in developmental dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 325–340.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1987). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 3. Standard Progressive Matrices. London: H. K. Lewis & Co.Google Scholar
Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H., & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic writing. Cognition, 24, 31–34.Google Scholar
Segmental Analysis and Literacy [special issue]. (1987). European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7(5).Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546–554.Google Scholar
Stuart, M., & Coltheart, M. (1988). Does reading develop in a sequence of stages?. Cognition, 30, 139–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Onset of Literacy [special issue]. (1986). Cognition, 24(1/2).Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., & Nesdale, A. R. (1982). The effects of digraphs and pseudowords on phonemic segmentation in young children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 299–311.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.Google Scholar