Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:10:49.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors that influence comprehension of connectives among language minority children from Spanish-speaking backgrounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

AMY C. CROSSON ,
NONIE K. LESAUX  and
MARIA MARTINIELLO
AMY C. CROSSON
Affiliation:
Harvard Graduate School of Education
NONIE K. LESAUX*
Affiliation:
Harvard Graduate School of Education
MARIA MARTINIELLO
Affiliation:
Educational Testing Service
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Nonie K. Lesaux, Department of Human Development and Psychology, 319 Larsen Hall, Harvard Graduate School of Education, 13 Appian Way, Cambridge, MA 02138. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores factors influencing the degree to which language minority (LM) children from Spanish-dominant homes understand how connectives, such as in contrast and because, signal relationships between text propositions. Standardized tasks of vocabulary, listening comprehension, word reading, and a researcher-designed text cohesion task were administered to 90 fourth-grade LM students. Understanding of connectives was influenced by vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension. The degree of challenge that specific connectives posed to LM students was predicted by the difficulty that connectives presented as vocabulary items and also by the type of semantic relationship between clauses they signaled. The findings point to factors that may present sources of difficulty underlying reading comprehension, in particular the critical role of oral language competencies.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 603 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

August, D. (2006). Demographic overview. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language—Minority Children and Youth (pp. 43–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Badzinski, D. M. (1988). Cohesion in children's discourse: Assessment of cognitive development. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 16, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebout, L. J., Segalowitz, S. J., & White, G. J. (1980). Children's comprehension of causal constructions with “because” and “so.” Child Development, 51, 565–568.Google Scholar
Beech, J. R., & Keys, A. (1997). Reading, vocabulary and language preference in 7- to 8- year-old bilingual Asian children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fliess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language, 7, 235–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, F. A., Bailey, A. L., Stevens, R., Huang, B., & Lord, C. (2004). Academic English in fifth-grade mathematics, science and social studies textbooks (CSE Report 642). Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.Google Scholar
Cain, K., Patson, N., & Andrews, L. (2005). Age- and ability-related differences in young readers' use of conjunctions. Journal of Child Language, 32, 877–892.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlisle, J. F., & Beeman, M. M. (2000). The effects of language of instruction on the reading and writing achievement of first-grade Hispanic children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlo, M. S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C. E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D. N., et al. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, E., & O'Rourke, J. (1981). The living word vocabulary. Chicago: World Book/Childcraft International.Google Scholar
Degand, L., & Sanders, T. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 739–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droop, M. & Verhoeven, L. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Padilla, E. R., Lugo, D. E., & Dunn, L. M. (1986). Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes Peabody: Adaptación Hispanoamericana. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Gallini, J. K., Spires, H. A., Terry, S., & Gleaton, J. (1993). The influence of macro and micro-level cognitive strategies training on text learning. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 164–178.Google Scholar
Garcia, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2005). English language learners in U.S. schools: An overview of the research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geva, E. (1992). The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 731–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geva, E. (2006a). Conjunction use in school children's oral language and reading. In Horowitz, R. (Ed.), Talking texts: How speech and writing interact in school learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Geva, E. (2006b). Second-language oral proficiency and second-language literacy. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language—Minority Children and Youth (pp. 123–139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1985). Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golding, J. M., Millis, K. M., Hauselt, J., & Sego, S. A. (1995). The effect of connectives and causal relatedness on comprehension. In Lorch, R. F. & O'Brien, E. J. (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 127–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. R., & Murray, J. D. (1992). Knowledge of connectors as cohesion devices in text: A comparative study of native-English and English-as-a-second-language speakers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 504–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haberlandt, K. (1982). Reader expectations in text comprehension. In Le Ny, J.-F. & Kintsch, W. (Eds.), Language and comprehension (pp. 239–249). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacquebord, H. (1994). L2-Reading in the content areas: Text comprehension in secondary education in The Netherlands. Journal of Research in Reading, 17, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. E. K., & Hasan, R. (1977). Cohesion in English. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. M., Whiteley, H. E., Smith, C. D., & Connors, L. (2003). The developmental progression of comprehension-related skills in children learning EAL. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindler, A. L. (2002). Survey of the states' limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services. 2000–2001 summary report. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition.Google Scholar
Knott, A., & Sanders, T. (1998). The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, S., & Schraw, G. (2002). Effects of coherence and relevance on shallow and deep text processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 738–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesaux, N. K., Koda, K., Siegel, L. S., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Development of literacy. In August, D. & Shanahan, T. (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language—Minority Children and Youth (pp. 75–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maury, P., & Teisserenc, A. (2005). The role of connectives in science text comprehension and memory. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 489–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, E., & Geva, E. (1983). The development of the cohesive use of adversative in discourse. Discourse Processes, 6, 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, E. F., & Steffensen, M. S. (1985). A study in the use of conjunctions across grades and ethnic groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 217–236.Google Scholar
Millis, K. K., Graesser, A. C., & Haberlandt, K. (1993). The impact of connectives on the memory for expository texts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millis, K. K., & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. D. (1994). Logical connectives and local coherence. In Lorch, R. F. & O'Brien, E. F. (Eds.), Sources of cohesion in text comprehension (pp. 107–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Murray, J. D. (1997). Connectives and narrative text: The role of continuity. Memory and Cognition, 25, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar
Nippold, M. A., Schwartz, I. E., & Undlin, R. A. (1992). Use and understanding of adverbial conjunctions: A developmental study of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 108–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (1998). Memory-based processing in understanding causal information. Discourse Processes, 26, 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozono, S., & Ito, H. (2003). Logical connectives as catalysts for interactive L2 reading. System, 31, 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.). The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 246–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Science and Technology Institute, RAND Education.Google Scholar
Sanders, T. J. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29, 37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T. J. M, Spooren, W. P. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical Report 2003-1). Irvine, CA: University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J. (1996). Conjunction in spoken English and ESL writing. Applied Linguistics, 17, 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J., & Colombi, M. C. (1997). Text organization by bilingual writers. Written Communication, 14, 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, E. W., Duchan, J. F., & Scott, P. J. (1991). The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults' interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes, 14, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L. R., & Hudson, J. A. (1991). Tell me a make-believe story: Coherence and cohesion in young children's picture-elicited narratives. Developmental Psychology, 27, 960–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Uccelli, P. (in press). The challenge of academic language>. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press..+In+Olson,+D.+R.+&+Torrance,+N.+(Eds.),+Cambridge+handbook+of+literacy.+New+York:+Cambridge+University+Press.>Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R. (2003). Individual differences as sources of variability in reading comprehension in elementary school children. In Sweet, A. P. & Snow, C. E. (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 51–81). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in a second language. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 90–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, R. W. (1991). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery—Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F. (1995). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery—Revised: Spanish Form. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
Zeno, S. M., Ivans, S. H., Millard, R. T. & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. New York: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.Google Scholar