Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:58:58.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The explicit/implicit knowledge distinction and working memory: Implications for second-language reading comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2012

GÜLCAN ERÇETİN  and
CEM ALPTEKİN
GÜLCAN ERÇETİN*
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University
CEM ALPTEKİN
Affiliation:
Bogaziçi University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Gülcan Erçetin, Faculty of Education, Department of Foreign Language Education, Bogaziçi University, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following an extensive overview of the subject, this study explores the relationships between second-language (L2) explicit/implicit knowledge sources, embedded in the declarative/procedural memory systems, and L2 working memory (WM) capacity. It further examines the relationships between L2 reading comprehension and L2 WM capacity as well as those between L2 reading comprehension and L2 explicit/implicit knowledge sources. Participants were late adult learners of English as an L2, with a relatively advanced level of English proficiency. They completed tests measuring their WM capacity, explicit knowledge, implicit knowledge, and L2 reading comprehension. Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between L2 WM capacity and both explicit and implicit L2 knowledge. Exploratory factor analysis showed that explicit knowledge, WM capacity, and L2 reading comprehension loaded on a single factor whereas implicit L2 knowledge formed an independent factor with no relationship to L2 reading. The results suggest that L2 WM is able to manipulate and store both explicit and implicit L2 input through controlled and automatic processes. They also suggest that L2 explicit knowledge, connected with the control processes of the declarative system's lexical/semantic features, and L2 WM, reflecting attentional resource capacity/allocation associated with control processes, play an important role in L2 reading comprehension.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , July 2013 , pp. 727 - 753
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abutalebi, J., & Green, D. (2007). Bilingual language production: The neurocognition of language representation and control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20, 242–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34, 494–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2009). Assessing the relationship of working memory to L2 reading: Does the nature of comprehension process and reading span task make a difference? System, 37, 627–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). The effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, B. J. (2003). Working memory requires conscious processes, not vice versa. In Osaka, N. (Ed.), Neural basis of consciousness (pp. 19–34). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baars, B. J., & Franklin, S. (2003). How conscious experience and working memory interact. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 166–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowden, H. W., Gelfand, M. P., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Verbal inflectional morphology in L1 and L2 Spanish: A frequency effects study examining storage versus composition. Language Learning, 60, 44–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., & Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Neubauer, K. (2010). Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-native speakers. Lingua, 120, 2627–2637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Hannon, B. (2007). What do working memory span tasks like reading span really measure? In Osaka, N., Logie, R. H., & D'Esposito, M. (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of working memory (pp. 21–42). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Diego Balaguer, R., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2010). Contributions to the functional neuroanatomy of morphosyntactic processing in L2. Language Learning, 60, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N. (2005). Can second language grammar be learned through listening?: An experimental study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2009). Cognitive-psychological processes in second language learning. In Long, M. H. & Doughty, C. J. (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 119–138). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., & Juffs, A. (2005). Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 437–454). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 735–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowens, M. G., Vergara, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Morpho-syntactic processing in late second language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1870–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, C. J., Warren, J., Hajek, J., Manwaring, D., & Davies, A. (1999). Metalinguistic knowledge: How important is it in studying a language at university? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2004). The processes of second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S., & Overstreet, M. (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 49–76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2007). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In Cenoz, J. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 6, pp. 119–132). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Loewen, S. (2005). Confirming the operational definitions of explicit and implicit knowledge in Ellis (2005). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 119–126.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbro, F. (1999). The neurolinguistics of bilingualism: An introduction. East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1993). Linguistic and cognitive correlates of academic skills in first and second languages. Language Learning, 43, 5–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (2003). The neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition. In van, R. Hout, Hulk, A., Kuiken, F., & Towell, R. (Eds.), The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 197–208). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halford, G. S., Cowan, N., & Andrews, G. (2007). Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 236–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassin, R. R., Bargh, J. A., Engell, A. D., & McCulloch, K. C. (2009). Implicit working memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 665–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatcher, L. (1994). Step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Havik, E. (2005, September). Working memory and second language acquisition. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of EUROSLA, Dubrovnik, Croatia.Google Scholar
Horiba, Y. (1996). Comprehension processes in L2 reading: Language competence, textual coherence, and inferences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 433–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? Studia Linguistica, 54, 150–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., Healy, A., Hegarety, M., Pennington, B., & Salthouse, T. (1999). Eight questions and some general issues. In Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 412–441). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Comprehension. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 209–226). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koziol, L. F., & Budding, D. E. (2009). Subcortical structures and cognition: Implications for neuropsychological assessment. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York: Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2007). Learner-based factors in L2 reading comprehension and processing grammatical form: Topic familiarity and working memory. Language Learning, 57, 229–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2010). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60, 501–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitknen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., et al. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60, 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J. W., Polunenko, A., & Marinellie, S. A. (2009). Role of working memory in children's understanding spoken narrative: A preliminary investigation. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K., Sanz, C., Steinhauer, K., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60, 154–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52, 439–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, A. J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., & Neville, H. J. (2007). An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. NeuroImage, 34, 435–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osaka, M., & Osaka, N. (1992). Language-independent working memory as measured by Japanese and English reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 287–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osaka, M., Osaka, N., & Groner, R. (1993). Language-independent working memory: Evidence from German and French reading span tests. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2452–2465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papadopoulou, D. (2005). Reading-time studies of second language ambiguity resolution. Second Language Research, 21, 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pliatsikas, C. (2010). Grammatical processing in second language learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Pulido, D. (2009). How involved are American L2 learners of Spanish in lexical input processing tasks during reading? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reber, P. J., & Kotovsky, K. (1997). Implicit learning in problem solving: The role of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 178–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, P. J., & Squire, L. R. (1998). Encapsulation of implicit and explicit memory in sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 248–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabourin, L. L., & Haverkort, M. (2003). Neural substrates of representation and processing of a second language. In van, H. Hout, Hulk, A., Kuiken, F., & Towell, R. J. (Eds.), The lexicon–syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 175–195). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, L. R. (1986). Mechanisms of memory. Science, 232, 1612–1619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, L. R. (1987). Memory and brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taillefer, G. (1996). L2 reading ability: Further insights into the short-circuit hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 80, 461–477.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, B. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies (pp. 171–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001a). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001b). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2001c). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature, 2, 717–726.Google ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2007). The biocognition of the mental lexicon. In Gaskell, M. G. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 267–286). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T, Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H., Koroshetz, W. J., et al. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hell, J. G., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26, 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5–31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vokey, J. R., & Higham, P. A. (1999). Implicit knowledge as automatic, latent knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walenski, M., & Ullman, M. T. (2005). The science of language. Linguistic Review, 22, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, C. (2004). Transfer of reading comprehension skills to L2 is linked to mental representations of text and to L2 working memory. Applied Linguistics, 25, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartenburger, I., Heekeren, H. R., Burchert, F., de Bleser, R., & Villringer, A. (2003). Grammaticality judgments on sentences with and without movement of phrasal constituents—An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitney, P., Arnett, P. A., Driver, A., & Budd, D. (2001). Measuring central executive functioning: What's in a reading span? Brain and Cognition, 45, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar