Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:17:41.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating maturational parallels in second language children and children with specific language impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2010

Mabel L. Rice
Mabel L. Rice*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In her Keynote Article in this issue, Paradis explores the nature of bilingual language acquisition by examining the question of possible similarities between children learning a second language (L2) and children with specific language impairment (SLI) who are monolingual or bilingual. She evaluates the maturation model of Rice (2004), the extended optional infinitive (EOI) model, that focuses on children's acquisition of finiteness marking during the early childhood period. Paradis alludes to the issue of how to deal with the nonparallels between chronological age and acquisition in the comparison of L2 and SLI language acquisition within maturational models. I explore that issue further in this Commentary, using the available growth templates drawn from the work on English-speaking typically developing children and children with SLI for projected possible growth trajectories for bilingual and L2 children, with and without SLI.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 320 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Genesee, F., Paradis, J., & Crago, C. (2004). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Simon-Cereijido, G., & Wagner, C. (2008). Bilingual children with language impairment: A comparison with monolinguals and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadley, P. A., & Short, H. (2005). The onset of tense marking in children at risk for specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1344–1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J., Crago, M., Genesee, F., & Rice, M. L. (2003). French–English bilingual children with SLI: How do they compare with their monolingual peers? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J., Rice, M. L., Crago, M., & Marquis, J. (2008). The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child second language from first language and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 689–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L. (2004). Growth models of developmental language disorders. In Rice, M. L. & Warren, S. F. (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies (pp. 207–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L., Hoffman, L., & Wexler, K. (in press). Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of SLI to fifteen years. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L., Redmond, S. M., Hoffman, L. (2006). MLU in children with SLI and younger control children shows concurrent validity, stable and parallel growth trajectories. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 793–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L., Taylor, C., & Zubrick, S. R. (2008). Language outcomes of 7-year-old children with or without a history of late language emergence at 24 months. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 394–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L., & Wexler, K. (2001). Rice/Wexler Test of Early Grammatical Impairment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L., Wexler, K., & Hershberger, S. (1998). Tense over time: The longitudinal course of tense acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1412–1431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L., Wexler, K., & Redmond, S. (1999). Grammaticality judgments of an extended optional infinitive grammar: Evidence from English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 943–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In Lightfoot, D. & Hornstein, N. (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar