Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:09:25.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of word length and wordlikeness on pseudoword repetition by poor and normal readers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Wim H. J. Van Bon  and
Judith M. L. Van Der Pijl
Wim H. J. Van Bon*
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
Judith M. L. Van Der Pijl
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
*
Wim H. J. van Bon, Department of Special Education, University of Nijmegen, Postbus 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands, email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This Study investigated whether the pseudoword repetition difference between poor and normal readers could be explained by differences in memory for verbal materials or in familiarity with the composition of verbal materials. Dutch second graders and poor readers scoring in the same range on a word-reading test repeated pseudowords that varied in length and wordlikeness. The pseudoword repetition deficit of poor readers reported in the literature was replicated. Although the repetition scores were influenced by pseudoword length and wordlikeness, no interaction with reader group was found, thus indicating that neither variable represented a causal factor in the poor readers' repetition deficit. Statistical correction for reader group differences on a phoneme detection task and an auditory discrimination task made the pseudoword repetition difference disappear. We conclude that the basic problem is unlikely to be with subvocal rehearsal, and that the cause of the repetition deficit is already operative in early, perceptual stages of processing.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 101 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blalock, J. (1982). Persistent auditory language deficits in adults with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 604–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowers, P. G. (1989). Naming speed and phonological awareness: Independent contributors to reading disabilities. In McCormick, S. & Zutell, J. (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction: 38th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 165–172).Chicago:National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
Brady, S., Poggie, E., & Rapala, M. M. (1989). Speech repetition abilities in children whodiffer in reading skill. Language and Speech, 32, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, S. A., Shankweiler, D., & Mann, V. A. (1983). Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 345–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1972). Een minuut test Vorm A en B. Nijmegen: Berkhout.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Recognition of phoneme invariance by beginning readers. Confounding effects of global similarity. Reading and Writing, 5, 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catts, H. W. (1986). Speech production/phonological deficits in reading-disordered children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 504–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicci, R. (1983). Disorders of written language. In Myklebust, H. (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (Vol. 5, pp. 207–232). New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Denckla, M. B. (1977). Minimal brain dysfunction and dyslexia: Beyond diagnosis by exclusion. In Blau, M. E., Rapin, I., & Kinsbourne, M. (Eds.), Topics in child neurology. New York: Spectrum Publications.Google Scholar
De Weirdt, W. (1988). Speech perception and frequency discrimination in good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C. S., Emslie, H., & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). The influences of number of syllables and wordlikeness on children's repetition of nonwords. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, J. J., Syrdal-Lasky, A. K., Millay, K. K., & Knox, C. M. (1981). Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 401–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., & Littler, J. E. (1993). Development of memory span for spoken words: The role of rehearsal and item identification processes. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, T. T. S., Mason, A. W., & Blackburn, I. (1970). A retrospective study of 82 children with reading disability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 12, 271–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D., & Myklebust, H. (1967). Learning disabilities: Educational principles and practices. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. J. (1980). Persistent auditory disorders in young dyslexic adults. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamhi, A. G., Catts, H. W., Mauer, D., Apel, K., & Gentry, B. F. (1988). Phonological and spatial processing abilities in language and reading-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53, 316–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyle, J. G. (1970). Certain antenatal, perinatal, and developmental variables and reading retardation in middle class boys. Child Development, 41, 481–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, T. R. (1974). The dyslexic child. Hove: Priory Press.Google Scholar
Mommers, M. J. C., van Leeuwe, J. F. J., Oud, J. H. L., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (1986). Decoding skills, reading comprehension and spelling: A longitudinal investigation. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 11, 97–113.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. (1981). Do dyslexics have difficulty accessing articulatory information? Psychological Research, 43, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raven, J. C. (1965). Guide to using the Coloured Progressive Matrices. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
Reed, M. A. (1989). Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48, 270–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reitsma, P., & Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of written Dutch: An introduction. In Reitsma, P. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Acquisition of reading in Dutch (pp. 1–13). Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. (1993). Phonological processing in learning disabled adolescents. In Joshi, R. M. & Leong, C. K. (Eds.), Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and component processes (pp. 213–223). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. (1981). Phonemic deficits in developmental dyslexia. Psychological Research, 43, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snowling, M., Chiat, S., & Hulme, C. (1991). Words, nonwords, and phonological processes: Some comments on Gathercole, Willis, Emslie, and Baddeley. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M., Goulandris, N., Bowlby, M., & Howell, P. (1986). Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: A developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 489–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9, 182–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, G., Lean, N., & Schwartz, S. (1989). Pseudoword repetition ability in learning disabled children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, H. G., Fletcher, J. M., & Satz, P. (1982). Component processes in reading disabilities: Neuropsychological investigation of distinct reading subskill deficits. In Malatesha, R. N. & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.), Reading disorders: Varieties and treatments (pp. 121–147). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
van Bon, W. H. J. (1986). Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices (Nederlandse normen en enige andere uitkomsten van onderzoek). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
van Bon, W. H. J., Schreuder, R., Duighuisen, H. C. M., & Kerstholt, M. T. (1994). Phonemic segmentation: Testing and training. In van den Bos, K. P.Siegel, L. S.Bakker, D. J. & Share, D. L. (Eds.), Current directions in dyslexia research (pp. 169–181). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1987). Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 48–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willemse, R. (n.d.). Statistieken over 73,713 woorden. Unpublished report, Nijmegen University.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R., & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yopp, H. K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar