Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-24T06:35:24.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Down the Garden Path: Inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael Tomasello  and
Carol Herron
Michael Tomasello*
Affiliation:
Emory University
Carol Herron
Affiliation:
Emory University
*
Michael Tomasello, Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we compared two methods for teaching grammatical exceptions in the foreign language classroom. Thirty-nine students in two sections of an introductory college French course served as subjects. Eight target structures, exemplifying “exceptions to a rule,” were randomly assigned to one of two teaching conditions for a section taught in the spring; each structure was assigned to the opposite teaching condition for a section taught the following fall. In one condition we simply taught the students the exception as an exception. In the other – what we called the Garden Path condition – we presented canonical exemplars encouraging students to induce the rule; we then asked them to generate the form (which we knew to be an exception) and then corrected their resulting overgeneralization error. Analysis of subsequent formal testing showed that students learned the exception better in the Garden Path condition and that this advantage persisted throughout the semesterlong course. We hypothesized that this technique helped students to focus attention both on the rule and on the features of the particular structure that marked it as an exception.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 237 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bley-Vroman, R. (1986). Hypothesis testing in second-language acquisition theory. Language Learning, 36, 353–376.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1983). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Gleitman, L. & Wanner, E. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Hayes, J. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27, 29–46.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1978). Language learner language. In Richards, J. (Ed.), Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and approaches. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Demetras, M. J., Post, K. N., & Snow, C. E. (1986). Feedback to first language learners: The role of repetitions and clarification questions. Journal of Child Language, 13, 275–292.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1974). Is second language learning like the first? TESOL Quarterly, 8, 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10, 583–593.Google Scholar
Farrar, J. (1986). Acquiring grammatical morphemes from discourse: A cognitive perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Emory University.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, J. M. (1978). Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research, and practice. Modern Language Journal, 62, 387–397.Google Scholar
Herron, C. (1981). The treatment of errors in oral activities: Developing instructional strategies. French Review, 55, 6–16.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Trieman, R., & Schneiderman, M. (1984). Brown and Hanlon revisited: Mothers' sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. Journal of Child Language, 11, 81–83.Google Scholar
Holley, F. M., & King, J. K. (1971). Imitation and correction in foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 55, 494–498.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information processing perspective. Language Learning, 33, 135–158.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E. (1977). Facilitating children's syntax acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 13, 101–107.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Denninger, M. M., Bonvillian, J. D., Kaplan, B. J., & Baker, N. D. (1984). Maternal input adjustments and non-adjustments as related to children's linguistic advances and to language acquisition theories. In Pelligrini, A. & Yawkey, T. (Eds.), The development of oral and written language in social contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Penner, S. (1986). Parental responses to grammatical and ungrammatical child utterances. Child Development, 58, 376–384.Google Scholar
Ramirez, A., & Stromquist, N. (1979). ESL methodology and student language learning in bilingual elementary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 145–158.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. M. (1986). Comprehension and production in interactive language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 70, 1–7.Google Scholar
Savignon, S. (1972). Communicative competence: An experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.Google Scholar
Terrell, T. D. (1977). A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning. Modern Language Journal, 66, 121–132.Google Scholar
Terrell, T. D. (1982). The natural approach to language teaching: An update. Modern Language Journal, 61, 325–337.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Mannle, S., & Werdenschlag, L. (in press). The effect of previously learned words on the child's acquisition of words for similar referents. Journal of Child Language.Google Scholar