Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:06:39.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual and associative processing in antonymy and synonymy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2015

Walter G. Charles ,
Marjorie A. Reed  and
Douglas Derryberry
Walter G. Charles
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Marjorie A. Reed*
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
Douglas Derryberry
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
*
Psychology Department, Oregon State University, Moreland 102, Corvalis, OR 97331-5303
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent models of antonymy differ over the involvement of associative and conceptual connections in the representation of direct and indirect antonyms. To assess these models, subjects were presented with two sequential adjectives. In the first study they made relatedness judgments, and in the second study they made antonym and synonym judgments. Conceptual processes were manipulated by varying semantic distance, and associative processes were manipulated by varying lexical markedness. Judgments were fastest for direct antonyms, even when compared to synonyms of similar relatedness. Although judgments for synonyms were faster than for indirect antonyms, semantic distance and markedness had similar effects on these word classes. These results suggest that direct antonymy may utilize associative connections, but that indirect antonymy, like synonymy, relies primarily on conceptual connections.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 329 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balota, D. A., Ferraro, F. R., & Connor, L. T. (1991). On the early influence of meaning in word recognition: A review of the literature. In Schwanenflugel, P. J. (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 187–222). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Becker, A. L. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory and Cognition, 8, 493–512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, W. G. (1988). The categorization of sentential contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 77, 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, W. G., & Miller, G. A. (1989). Contexts of antonymous adjectives. Applied Psycho-linguistics, 10, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, L., & Williams, J. (1990). Effects of word- and sentence-level contexts upon word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 18, 153–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deese, J. (1964). The associative structure of some English adjectives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deese, J. (1965). The structure of associations in language and thought. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (1993). Co-occurrence and antonymy. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S., & Miller, G. A. (1989). The recognition of antonymy by a language-enriched right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 187–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, D., Fischer, U., & Miller, G. (1989). Antonymy and the representation of adjectival meanings. Memory and Language, 28, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, D., & Miller, K. J. (1990). Adjectives in WordNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. J., & Palermo, D. S. (1964). Word association norms: Grade school through college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. & Charles, W. G. (1991). Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L., & Andrew, J. M. (1983). The conceptual basis of antonymy and synonymy in adjectives. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 310–319.Google Scholar
Neely, J. H. (1990). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Besner, D. & Humphreys, G. (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264–336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Niemi, P., Vauras, M., & von Wright, J. (1980). Semantic activation due to synonym, antonym, and rhyme production. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar