Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T14:14:48.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beyond words: Phonological short-term memory and syntactic impairment in specific language impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2006

Dorothy V. M. Bishop
Affiliation:
University of Oxford

Extract

The assessment of nonword repetition in children goes back at least to 1974, when the Goldman–Fristoe–Woodcock Auditory Skills Battery was published, including a subtest (Sound Mimicry) assessing nonword repetition (Goldman, Fristoe, & Woodcock, 1974). Nevertheless, it was not until 20 years later, when Gathercole and Baddeley (1990) reported a study of short-term memory in children with specific language impairment (SLI), that a theoretical framework was developed linking deficits in nonword repetition to impaired language acquisition. Gathercole's Keynote in this issue (2006) tells the story of how this initial study revealed a striking nonword repetition deficit in children with SLI, complementing work on typically developing children showing a major role of phonological short-term memory (STM) in word learning. As she points out, the story is a complex one: phonological STM is not the only skill tapped by the nonword repetition task, and children may do poorly for different reasons. Furthermore, relationships between nonword repetition and word learning may be reciprocal, with vocabulary level affecting children's ability to segment nonwords efficiently and retain them in memory. However, the original finding, that deficient nonword repetition is a strong correlate of SLI, has stood the test of time, to the extent that poor performance on this test has been used successfully as a marker of a heritable phenotype in molecular genetic studies of SLI (Newbury, Monaco, & Bishop, 2005).

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley A., Gathercole S., & Papagno C. 1998. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158173.Google Scholar
Bishop D. V. M., Adams C. V., & Norbury C. F. 2006. Distinct genetic influences on grammar and phonological short-term memory deficits: Evidence from 6-year-old twins. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 5, 158169.Google Scholar
Gathercole S. E. 2006. Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship [Keynote]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513543.Google Scholar
Gathercole S. E., & Baddeley A. D. 1990. Phonological memory deficits in language disordered children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 336360.Google Scholar
Gathercole S. E., Tiffany C., Briscoe J., Thorn A. S. C., & The ALSPAC Team. 2005. Developmental consequences of poor phonological short-term memory function in childhood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 598611.Google Scholar
Goldman R., Fristoe M., & Woodcock R. W. 1974. Goldman–Fristoe–Woodcock Auditory Skills Battery. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Joanisse M. F., & Seidenberg M. S. 1998. Specific language impairment: A deficit in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 240247.Google Scholar
Leonard L. B. 1998. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Newbury D. F., Bishop D. V. M., & Monaco A. P. 2005. Genetic influences on language impairment and phonological short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 528534.Google Scholar
Norbury C. F., Bishop D. V. M., & Briscoe J. 2001. Production of English finite verb morphology: A comparison of SLI and mild–moderate hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 165178.Google Scholar
Sahlén B., Reuterskiöld-Wagner C., Nettelbladt U., & Radeborg K. 1999. Non-word repetition in children with language impairment—Pitfalls and possibilities. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 337352.Google Scholar