Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:38:22.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variations in phonological working memory: The contribution of impaired representation and bilingual processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

Sharon Armon-Lotem
Sharon Armon-Lotem*
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Children with bilingual typical language development (BITLD) and children with specific language impairment (SLI) present similarities in their linguistic performance (e.g., vocabulary and verb inflections). These observed similarities (Paradis 2010) have led to an influx of studies exploring the sources of these similarities and pointing to areas of disparity aiming to dissociate the effects of SLI and bilingualism in bilingual children with SLI (BISLI). The intriguing link, explored in the Pierce et al. (2017) keynote, between early language experience and the development of phonological working memory (PWM) seamlessly ties into this discussion. Bilinguals, and particularly simultaneous bilinguals, it is claimed, experience an enriched linguistic environment in early childhood that is expected to enhance their PWM. By contrast, children with SLI are claimed to have a neurocognitive impairment that negatively affects their PWM. This commentary explores, first, how both age of onset (AoO) of bilingual exposure and the neurocognitive impairment associated with SLI impact PWM and, second, how this impact might be related to the observed similarities as well as evident differences that emerge from studies comparing children with BITLD to children with SLI (monolingual and bilingual).

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 6 , November 2017 , pp. 1305 - 1313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Short-term and working memory in specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 675–693. doi:10.1080/13682820500442602 Google Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S., & Chiat, S. (2012). How do sequential bilingual children perform on non-word repetition tasks? In Biller, A. K., Chung, E. Y., & Kimball, A. E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 53–62). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chiat, S. (2015). Nonword repetition. In Armon-Lotem, S., de Jong, J., & Meir, N. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment (pp. 123–148). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513–543.Google Scholar
Goldstein, T. (2017). Vocabulary and metalinguistic awareness of monolingual and bilingual preschool children (Unpublished master's thesis, Bar Ilan University).Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Dromi, E., & Adam, G. (2000). Tense and finiteness in the speech of children with specific language impairment acquiring Hebrew. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 319–335.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2015). Sentence repetition. In Armon-Lote-Lotem, S., de Jong, J., & Meir, N. (Eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from specific language impairment (pp. 95–124). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R., Harris, J., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2003). The nature of phonological representations in children with grammatical-specific language impairment (G-SLI). In Hall, D., Markopoulos, T., Salamoura, A., & Skoufaki, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the University of Cambridge First Postgraduate Conference in Language Research (Vol. 1, pp. 511–517). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, N., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2017). Delay or deviance: Old question—New evidence from bilingual children with specific language impairment (SLI). In LaMendola, M. & Scott, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 495–508). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Meir, N., Walters, J., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2016). Bidirectional morpho-syntactic transfer: The role of age of onset and language proficiency. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1075/lab.15007.mei Google Scholar
Messer, M. H., Leseman, P. P. M., Boom, J., & Mayo, A. Y. (2010). Phonotactic probability effect in nonword recall and its relationship with vocabulary in monolingual and bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 306–323.Google Scholar
Miller, C., Kail, R., Leonard, L., & Tomblin, J. B. (2001). Speed of processing in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 416–433.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2010). The interface between bilingual development and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 227–252.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2016). Bilingual children's long-term outcomes in English as a second language: Language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/desc.12433 Google ScholarPubMed
Pierce, L. J., Genesee, F, Delcenserie, A., & Morgan, G. (2017). Variation in phonological working memory: Linking early language experiences and language learning outcomes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 1265–1302.Google Scholar
Summers, C., Bohman, T. M., Gillam, R. B., Peña, E. D., & Bedore, L. M. (2010). Bilingual performance on nonword repetition in Spanish and English. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 45, 480–493.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1973). Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia. Nature, 241, 468–469.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M. (1975). Developmental aphasia: The perception of brief vowels and extended stop consonants. Neuropsychologia, 13, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thordardottir, E. (2011). The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorn, A. S. C., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 52, 303–324.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41, 399–433.Google Scholar
van Daal, J., Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & van Balkom, H. (2008). Working memory limitations in children with severe language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 85–107.Google Scholar