Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:49:31.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speech rates converge in scripted turn-taking conversations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2015

BENJAMIN G. SCHULTZ ,
IRENA O’BRIEN ,
NATALIE PHILLIPS ,
DAVID H. McFARLAND ,
DEBRA TITONE  and
CAROLINE PALMER
BENJAMIN G. SCHULTZ
Affiliation:
McGill University
IRENA O’BRIEN
Affiliation:
McGill University
NATALIE PHILLIPS
Affiliation:
Concordia University
DAVID H. McFARLAND
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
DEBRA TITONE
Affiliation:
McGill University
CAROLINE PALMER*
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Caroline Palmer, Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada. E-mail: mailto:[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When speakers engage in conversation, acoustic features of their utterances sometimes converge. We examined how the speech rate of participants changed when a confederate spoke at fast or slow rates during readings of scripted dialogues. A beat-tracking algorithm extracted the periodic relations between stressed syllables (beats) from acoustic recordings. The mean interbeat interval (IBI) between successive stressed syllables was compared across speech rates. Participants’ IBIs were smaller in the fast condition than in the slow condition; the difference between participants’ and the confederate's IBIs decreased across utterances. Cross-correlational analyses demonstrated mutual influences between speakers, with greater impact of the confederate on participants’ beat rates than vice versa. Beat rates converged in scripted conversations, suggesting speakers mutually entrain to one another's beat.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , September 2016 , pp. 1201 - 1220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. M., & Giles, H. (1984). Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 5–32.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P. M., & Fowler, C. A. (1989). On sensitivity to durational modifications in Italian and English. Rivista di Linguistica, 1, 69–94.Google Scholar
Borrie, S. A., & Liss, J. M. (2014). Rhythm as a coordinating device: Entrainment with disordered speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Bosshardt, H.-G., Sappok, C., Knipschild, M., & Holscher, C. (1997). Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & McLean, J. F. (2010). Linguistic alignment between humans and computers. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2355–2368.Google Scholar
Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Classé, A. (1939). The rhythm of English prose. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corriveau, K. H., & Goswami, U. (2009). Rhythmic motor entrainment in children with speech and language impairments: Tapping to the beat. Cortex, 45, 119–130.Google Scholar
Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S. (1990). Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 101–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, F. (2009). Rhythm as entrainment: The case of synchronous speech. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, F. (2012). Looking for rhythm in speech. Empirical Musicology Review, 7, 1–2.Google Scholar
Cummins, F., & Port, R. (1998). Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (1991). Linguistic rhythm and speech segmentation. In Sundberg, J., Nord, L., & Carlson, R. (Eds.), Music, language, speech, and brain (pp. 157–166). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N. D., & Richardson, D. C. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 43–95). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, D. P. W. (2007a). Beat tracking by dynamic programming. Journal of New Music Research, 36, 51–60.Google Scholar
Ellis, D. P. W. (2007b). Music audio tempo estimation and beat tracking. Dan Ellis: Research, Retrieved from http://labrosa.ee.columbia.edu/projects/beattrack/ Google Scholar
Giles, H. (Ed.) (1977). Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations (pp. 1–370). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gill, S. P. (2012). Rhythmic synchrony and mediated interaction: Towards a framework of rhythm in embodied interaction. AI & Society, 27, 111–127.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Lane, H. (1976). How the listener integrates the components of speaking rate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 538–543.Google Scholar
Guaïtella, I. (1999). Rhythm in speech: What rhythmic organizations reveal about cognitive processes in spontaneous speech production versus reading aloud. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 509–523.Google Scholar
Huber, J. E. (2008). Effects of utterance length and vocal loudness on speech breathing in older adults. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 164, 323–330.Google Scholar
Janata, P., Tomic, S. T., & Haberman, J. M. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 54–75.Google Scholar
Jassem, W., Hill, D. R., & Witten, I. H. (1984). Isochrony in English speech: Its statistical validity and linguistic relevance. Intonation, Accent and Rhythm, 8, 203–225.Google Scholar
Jones, M. R. (2009). Musical time. In Hallam, S., Cross, I., & Thaut, M. (Eds.), The handbook of music psychology (pp. 81–92). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jungers, M. K., Palmer, C., & Speer, S. R. (2002). Time after time: The coordinating influence of tempo in music and speech. Cognitive Processing, 1–2, 21–35.Google Scholar
Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 153–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2002). Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2165–2172.Google Scholar
Kuhlen, A. K., Allefeld, C., & Haynes, J. D. (2012). Content-specific coordination of listeners’ to speakers’ EEG during communication. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2012). Language in dialogue: When confederates might be hazardous to your data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 54–72.Google Scholar
Large, E. W., Fink, P., & Kelso, S. J. (2002). Tracking simple and complex sequences. Psychological Research, 66, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1977). Isochrony revisited. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 253–263.Google Scholar
Lidji, P., Palmer, C., Peretz, I., & Morningstar, M. (2011). Listeners feel the beat: Entrainment to English and French speech rhythms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 1035–1041.Google Scholar
London, J. (2012). Hearing in time (pp. 3–7). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A. (2013). Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation. Evolution & Human Behavior, 34, 419–426.Google Scholar
Marcus, S. M. (1981). Acoustic determinants of perceptual center (P-center) location. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 247–256.Google Scholar
McFarland, D. H. (2001). Respiratory markers of conversational interaction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 128–143.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. F., Moelants, D., Davies, M. E. P., & Klapuri, A. (2007). Evaluation of audio beat tracking and music tempo extraction algorithms. Journal of New Music Research, 36, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. (1949). Death of a salesman. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. L., & Grosjean, F. (1981). How the components of speaking rate influence perception of phonetic segments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 208–215.Google Scholar
Miller, J. L., Grosjean, F., & Lomato, C. (1984). Articulation rate and its variability in spontaneous speech: A reanalysis and some implications. Phonetica, 41, 215–225.Google Scholar
Morton, J., Marcus, S., & Frankish, C. (1976). Perceptual centers (P-centers). Psychological Review, 83, 405–408.Google Scholar
Natale, M. (1975). Convergence of mean vocal intensity in dyadic communication as a function of social desirability. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 32, 790–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. (2011). Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 10234–10240.Google Scholar
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., & Mouraux, A. (2012). Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meter embedded in a musical rhythm. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 17572–17581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382–2393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C., Hoshino, R., Hasbun, S. M., Sowemimo-Coker, C., & Krauss, R. M. (2013). The influence of role-switching on phonetic convergence in conversation. Discourse Processes, 50, 276–300.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. S., Jay, I. C., & Krauss, R. M. (2010). Conversational role influences speech imitation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2254–2264.Google Scholar
Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain (pp. 96–154). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Povel, D. J., & Essens, P. (1985). Perception of temporal patterns. Music Perception, 2, 411–440.Google Scholar
Quenouille, M. (1949). Approximate tests of correlation in time series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 11, 68–84.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., & Mehler, J. (1999). Language identification with suprasegmental cues: A study based on speech resynthesis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 512–521.Google Scholar
Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867–891.Google Scholar
Rothermich, K., Schmidt-Kassow, M., & Kotz, S. A. (2012). Rhythm's gonna get you: Regular meter facilitates semantic sentence processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 232–244.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. C., Richardson, M. J., Arsenault, C., & Galantucci, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 860–870.Google Scholar
Shen, Y., & Peterson, G. G. (1962). Isochronism in English. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, 9, 1–36.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M., Van Heuven, V. J., & Pacilly, J. J. (1997). Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 503–513.Google Scholar
Stephens, G. J., Silbert, L. J., & Hasson, U. (2010). Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 14425–14430.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S., Volkmann, J., & Newman, E. B. (1937). The Mel scale equates the magnitude of perceived differences in pitch at different frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 8, 185–190.Google Scholar
Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11, 139–169.Google Scholar
Street, R. L. Jr., Street, N. J., & Van Kleek, A. (1983). Speech convergence among talkative and reticent three-year-olds. Language Sciences, 5, 79–96.Google Scholar
Tierney, A. T., & Kraus, N. (2013). The ability to tap to a beat relates to cognitive, linguistic, and perceptual skills. Brain & Language, 124, 225–231.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. W. (1958). Bias and confidence in not quite large samples (abstract). Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 614.Google Scholar
Villing, R., Ward, T., & Timoney, J. (2003, July 1–2). P-Centre extraction from speech: The need for a more reliable measure. Paper presented at the Irish Signals & Systems Conference (ISSC 2003), Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
Volaitis, L. E., & Miller, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 723–735.Google Scholar
Webb, J. T. (1969). Subject speech rates as a function of interviewer behavior. Language & Speech, 12, 54–67.Google Scholar
Webb, J. T. (1972). Interview synchrony: An investigation of two speech rate measures in an automated standardized interview. In Pope, B. & Siegman, A. W. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 115–133). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, O. (1908). Collected works of Oscar Wilde. Metheun, MA: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, M., & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 957–968.Google Scholar