Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T01:02:00.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relevance of oral language skills to early literacy: A multivariate analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

Deborah L. Speece ,
Froma P. Roth ,
David H. Cooper  and
Susan De La Paz
Deborah L. Speece*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Froma P. Roth
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
David H. Cooper
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Susan De La Paz
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
*
Deborah L. Speece, Department of Special Education, 1308 Benjamin Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined relationships between oral language and literacy in a two-year, multivariate design. Through empirical cluster analysis of a sample of 88 kindergarten children, four oral language subtypes were identified based on measures of semantics, syntax, metalinguistics, and oral narration. Validation efforts included (a) concurrent and predictive analyses of subtype differences on reading, spelling, and listening comprehension measures based on a priori hypotheses and (b) a comparison of the teacher classification of the children with the empirical classification. The subtypes represented high average, low average, high narrative, and low overall patterns of oral language skill. The high average subtype received the most consistent evidence for validation. The pattern of validation results indicates that the relationship between oral language and literacy is not uniform and suggests a modification of the assumption that oral language skills have a direct role in reading acquisition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 167 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-044.) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Aram, D., & Nation, J. (1975). Patterns of language behavior in children with developmental language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 229–241.Google Scholar
Beitchman, J. H., Hood, J., Rochon, J., Peterson, M., Mantini, T., & Majumdar, S. (1989). Empirical classification of speech/language impairment in children: I. Identification of speech/language categories. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28, 112–117.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. M., & Adams, C. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders, and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027–1050.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. M., & Edmundson, A. (1987). Language-impaired four-year-olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 156–173.Google Scholar
Bowey, J. A., & Patel, R. K. (1988). Metalinguistic ability and early reading achievement. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 367–383.Google Scholar
Bryant, P., MacLean, M., & Bradley, L. (1990). Rhyme, language, and children’s reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 237–252.Google Scholar
Butler, S. R., Marsh, H. W., Sheppard, M. J., & Sheppard, J. L. (1985). Seven-year longitudinal study of the early prediction of reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 349–361.Google Scholar
Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1985). Test for auditory comprehension of language (rev. ed.). Allen, TX: Developmental Learning Materials.Google Scholar
Catts, H. W. (1993). The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 948–958.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456–473.Google Scholar
Crystal, D., Fletcher, P., & Garman, M. (1976). The grammatical analysis of language disability. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. E., & Snow, C. E. (1987). Interrelationships among prereading and oral language skills in kindergarten children from two social classes. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2, 1–25.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Feagans, L., & Appelbaum, M. I. (1986). Language subtypes and their validation in learning disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 358–364.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, F. & Harms, R. (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–90). New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Gentry, J. R., & Gillet, J. W. (1993). Teaching kids to spell. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. (1983). A language-oriented view of reading and its disorders. In Myklebust, H. (Ed.), Progress in learning disabilities (pp. 81–103). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Libermann, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1979). Speech, the alphabet, and teaching to read. In Resnick, L. B. & Weaver, P. A. (Eds.), Theory and practice in early reading (Vol. 2, pp. 109–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lorr, M. (1983). Cluster analysis for social scientists. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mann, V. A. (1984). Longitudinal prediction and prevention of early reading difficulty. Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 117–136.Google Scholar
Mattingly, I. G. (1972). Reading, the linguistic process, and linguistic awareness. In Kavanaugh, J. F. & Mattingly, I. G. (Eds.), Language by eye and by ear (pp. 133–148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.Google Scholar
Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1987). Methodology review: Clustering methods. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 329–354.Google Scholar
Morey, L., Blashfield, R., & Skinner, N. (1983). A comparison of cluster analysis techniques within a sequential validation framework. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 309–329.Google Scholar
Morris, R. D., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E., Lyon, G. R., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Francis, D. J., & Shaywitz, B. A. (in press). Subtypes of reading disability: Coherent variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
Newcomer, P., & Hammill, D. (1988). Test of Language Development–Primary (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Paul, R., Hernandez, R., Taylor, L., & Johnson, K. (1996). Narrative development in late talkers: Early school age. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1295–1303.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Beck, I., Bell, L., & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 283–319.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1965). The Coloured Progressive Matrices Test. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
Reid, D. K., Hresko, W. P., & Hammill, D. D. (1989). Test of Early Reading Ability (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Roth, F. P., Speece, D. L., Cooper, D. H., & De La Paz, S. (1996). Unresolved mysteries: How do metalinguistics and narratives connect with early reading? Journal of Special Education, 30, 257–277.Google Scholar
Roth, F. P., & Spekman, N. J. (1986). Narrative discourse: Spontaneously generated stories of learning disabled and normally achieving students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 8–23.Google Scholar
Roth, F. P., & Spekman, N. J.(1994). Oral story production abilities of adults with learning disabilities. In Bloom, R. L., Obler, L. K., DeSanti, S., & Ehrlich, J. (Eds.), Discourse in adult clinical populations (pp. 131–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
San Felipe–Del Rio Consolidated Independent School District. (1975). Del Rio English Story Comprehension Test.Google Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. (1992). SAS user’s guide: Statistics, version 6 edition. Cary, NC: Author.Google Scholar
SAS Institute, Inc. (1994). JMP, version 3. Cary, NC: Author.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1743.Google Scholar
Scarborough, H. (1991). Early syntactic development of dyslexic children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 207–220.Google Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (1987). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals– Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.Google Scholar
Skinner, H. A. (1981). Toward the integration of classification theory and methods. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 20, 68–87.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Tabors, P. O., Nicholson, P. A., & Kurland, B. F. (1995). SHELL: Oral language and early literacy skills in kindergarten and first-grade children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 10, 37–48.Google Scholar
Snyder, L. S., & Downey, D. M. (1991). The language-reading relationship in normal and readingdisabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 129–140.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433.Google Scholar
Stein, N., & Glenn, C. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In Freedle, R. O. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (1988). Developmental language disorders. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Truss, T. J. Jr., (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Proceedings of the national conference (pp. 181–272). Parkton, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Tallal, P., Curtiss, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The San Diego longitudinal study: Evaluating the outcomes of preschool impairment in language development. (Final Report, NINCDS.) Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Torgesen, J. K. (n.d.). Phonological awareness tasks. Unpublished manuscript, Florida State University.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., & Herriman, M. L. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness in children: A conceptual overview. In Tunmer, W. E., Pratt, C., & Herriman, M. L. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research, and implications (pp. 12–35). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denkla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Laughon, N. P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.Google Scholar
Westby, C. (1991). Learning talk – talking to learn: Oral–literate language differences. In Simon, C. (Ed.), Communications skills and classroom success: Assessment and therapy methodologies for language and learning disabled students (pp. 181–281). Eau Claire, WI: Thinking Publications.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (1988). Test of Language Competence–Expanded Edition (level 1). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock–Johnson Psychoeducational Battery– Revised. Allen, TX: Developmental Learning Materials.Google Scholar
Wren, C. T. (1984). Morphology and syntax. In Wren, C. T. (Ed.), Language learning disabilities (pp. 113–156). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.Google Scholar