Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:06:49.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological processing of Chinese compounds from a grammatical view

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2010

PHIL D. LIU  and
CATHERINE McBRIDE-CHANG
PHIL D. LIU
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
CATHERINE McBRIDE-CHANG*
Affiliation:
Chinese University of Hong Kong
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Catherine McBride-Chang, Department of Psychology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T. Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, morphological structure processing of Chinese compounds was explored using a visual priming lexical decision task among 21 Hong Kong college students. Two compounding structures were compared. The first type was the subordinate, in which one morpheme modifies the other (e.g., 籃 球 [laam4 kau4, basket-ball, basketball]), similar to most English compounds (e.g., a snowman is a man made of snow and toothpaste is a paste for teeth; the second morpheme is the “head,” modified morpheme). The second type was the coordinative, in which both morphemes contribute equally to the meaning of the word. An example in Chinese is 花 草 (faa1 cou2, flower grass, i.e., plant). There are virtually no examples of this type in English, but an approximate equivalent phrase might be in and out, in which neither in nor out is more important than the other in comprising the expression. For the subordinate Chinese compound words, the same structure in prime and target facilitated the semantic priming effect, whereas for coordinative Chinese compound words, the same structure across prime and target inhibited the semantic priming effect. Results suggest that lexical processing of Chinese compounds is influenced by compounding structure processing.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 605 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 489–511.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, E. V., Gelman, S. A., & Lane, N. M. (1985). Compound nouns and category structure in young children. Child Development, 56, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da, J. (2004). A corpus-based study of character and bigram frequencies in Chinese e-texts and its implications for Chinese language instruction. In Zhang, P., Xie, T., & Xu, J. (Eds.), The studies on the theory and methodology of the digitalized Chinese teaching to foreigners: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on New Technologies in Teaching and Learning Chinese (pp. 501–511). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Institute of Language Teaching and Research. (1986). A frequency dictionary of modern Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.Google Scholar
Katamba, F. (1993). Morphology. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kuo, L., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84, 50–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphological structure in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, D., Ding, G., Wang, C., Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1999). Chinese reversible word's processing: The role of morpheme on word processing. Acta Psychological Sinica, 31, 36–46.Google Scholar
Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Process, 9, 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, C., & Huang, C. (1998). The study of Chinese morphemes and word formation based on the morpheme data bank. Applied Linguistics (in China), 3, 83–88.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. X., Zhuang, J., Ma, L., Yu, W., Peng, D., Ding, G., et al. (2004). Semantic processing of Chinese in left inferior prefrontal cortex studied with reversible words. NeuroImage, 23, 975–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1995). Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Process, 10, 545–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Marslen-Wilson, W., Taft, M., & Shu, H. (1999). Morphology, orthography, and phonology in reading Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 525–565.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar