Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:17:51.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implicit knowledge of lexical stress rules: Evidence from the combined use of subjective and objective awareness measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

RICKY K. W. CHAN  and
JANNY H. C. LEUNG
RICKY K. W. CHAN*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong
JANNY H. C. LEUNG
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Ricky K. W. Chan, Department of English, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the growing interest in the phenomenon of learning without intention, the incidental learning of phonological features, especially prosodic features, has received relatively little attention. This paper reports an experiment on incidental learning of lexical stress rules, and investigates whether the resultant knowledge can be unconscious, abstract, and rule based. Participants were incidentally exposed to a lexical stress system where stress location of a word is mainly determined by the final phoneme, syllable type, and syllable weight. Learning was assessed by a pronunciation judgment task. Results indicate that participants were able to transfer their knowledge of stress patterns to novel words whose final phoneme was not previously encountered, suggesting that participants had acquired abstract and potentially rule-based knowledge. The combined use of subjective and objective measures of awareness in the present study provides a strong piece of evidence of the acquisition of implicit knowledge.

Keywords

confidence ratingsimplicit knowledgeincidental learninglexical stressprocess dissociation procedure
Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 37 - 66
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altmann, G. T. M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 899–912.Google Scholar
Baars, B. J. (2003). How brain reveals mind: Neuoimaging supports the central role of conscious experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 100–114.Google Scholar
Bailey, T., Plunkett, K., & Scarpe, E. (1999). A cross-linguistic study in learning prosodic rhythms: Rules, constraints, and similarity. Language and Speech, 42, 1–38.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. S., & Benedict, P. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. (1977). Accent placement and perception of prominence in rhythmic structures. In Hyman, L. (Ed.), Studies in stress and accent: Southern California occasional papers in linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 1–13). Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brooks, L. R., & Vokey, J. R. (1991). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. (1992). Implicit cognitive processes: Theoretical issues and applications in computer systems design (Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Oxford).Google Scholar
Chan, M. K. (2007). The perception and production of lexical stress by Cantonese speakers of English (Master's thesis, University of Hong Kong).Google Scholar
Chan, R., & Leung, J. (2014). Implicit learning of L2 word stress regularities. Second Language Research, 30, 463–483.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1947). Cantonese primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. R. (1980). Chinese tone and English stress. In Waugh, L. R. & Van Schooneveld, C. H. (Eds.), The melody of language (pp. 41–44). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Curran, T. (2001). Implicit learning revealed by the method of opposition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 503–504.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1986). Phonological structure in speech recognition. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 161–178.Google Scholar
Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dienes, Z. (2004). Assumptions of subjective measures of unconscious mental states: Higher order thoughts and bias. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, 25–45.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322–1338.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. C. (1997). Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 3–23.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., & Deway, G. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 541–555.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (1989). Implicit memory: Task or process? In Lewandowsky, S., Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (Eds.), Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 17–31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dutoit, T., Pagel, N., Pierret, N., Bataille, O., & van der Vrecken, O. (1996). The MBROLA project: Towards a set of high-quality speech synthesizers free of use for non-commercial purposes. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language, Philadephia, PA.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, M., Morgan-Short, K., Faretta-Stutenberg, M., & Wong, P. (2016). The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science, 40, 822–847.Google Scholar
Face, T. (2005). Syllable weight and the perception of Spanish stress placement by second language learners. Journal of Language and Learning, 3, 90–103.Google Scholar
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1–34.Google Scholar
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual differences in incidental vocabulary learning: Phonological working memory, learning styles, and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goschke, T., & Bolte, A. (2007). Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: Response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 394–406.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1999). The phonology of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). How implicit is statistical learning? In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 365–382). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2002). Towards a unified account of the representation, processing and acquisition of second language knowledge. Second Language Research, 18, 193–223.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2005). Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 129–140.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2008). Incidental and intentional learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (Vol. 27, p. 349). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L. L., Toth, J. P., & Yonelinas, A. P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 139–154.Google Scholar
Jamieson, R. K., & Hauri, B. (2012). An exemplar model of performance in the artificial grammar task: Holographic representation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 98–105.Google Scholar
Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2011). Grammaticality is inferred from global similarity: A reply to Kinder (2010). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 209–216.Google Scholar
Jiang, S., Zhu, L., Guo, X., Ma, W., Yang, Z., & Dienes, Z. (2012). Unconscious structural knowledge of tonal symmetry: Tang poetry redefines limits of implicit learning. Consciousness & Cognition, 21, 476–486.Google Scholar
Johnstone, T., & Shanks, D. R. (2001). Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 61–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinder, A., & Assmann, A. (2000). Learning artificial grammars: No evidence for the acquisition of rules. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1321–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 79–91.Google Scholar
Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 169–181.Google Scholar
Lai, W. W. S., Wang, D., Yan, N., Chan, V., & Zhang, L. (2011). Influence of English donor word stress on tonal assignment in Cantonese loanwords: An acoustic account. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leung, J., & Williams, J. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually-derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 33–55.Google Scholar
Leung, J., & Williams, J. (2012). Constraints on implicit learning of grammatical form-meaning connections. Language Learning, 62, 634–662.Google Scholar
Leung, J., & Williams, J. (2014). Cross-linguistic differences in implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 733–755.Google Scholar
Luke, K. K. (2000) Phonological re-interpretation: The assignment of Cantonese tones to English words. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, Singapore.Google Scholar
Morton, J., & Jassen, W. (1965). Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech, 8, 159–181.Google Scholar
Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.Google Scholar
Overgaard, M., Timmermans, B., Sandberg, K., & Cleeremans, A. (2010). Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 682–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perruchet, P. (1994). Learning from complex rule-governed environments: On the proper functions of non-conscious and conscious processes. In Umilta, C. & Moscovitch, M. (Eds.), Attention and performance: Vol. 15. Conscious and non-conscious information processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264–275.Google Scholar
Pothos, E. M. (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 227–244.Google Scholar
Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 847–862.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6, 855–863.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219–235.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2008). Implicit learning of natural language syntax (PhD thesis, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63, 595–626.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Sachs, R., Riestenberg, K., & Ziegler, N. (2013). Implicit and explicit knowledge of form-meaning connections: Evidence from subjective measures of awareness In Bergsleithner, J., Frota, S., & Yoshioka, J. K. (Eds.), Noticing and second language acquisition: Studies in honor of Richard Schmidt. Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 829–856.Google Scholar
Rohde, D. L. T., & Plaut, D. C. (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small? Cognition, 72, 67–109.Google Scholar
Rohrmeier, M., Fu, Q., & Dienes, Z. (2012). Implicit learning of recursive context-free grammars. PLOS ONE, 7, e45885.Google Scholar
Rohrmeier, M., Rebuschat, P., & Cross, I. (2011). Incidental and online learning of melodic structure. Consciousness & Cognition, 20, 214–222.Google Scholar
Rogers, J., Revesz, A., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Implicit and explicit knowledge of inflectional second language morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, D. M. (2005). Consciousness and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In Chan, W. M., Chi, S., Cin, K. N., Istanto, J., Nagami, M., Sew, J. W., . . . Walker, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010 (pp. 721–737). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Scott, D. R. (1982). Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 996–1007.Google Scholar
Scott, R., & Dienes, Z. (2010). Knowledge applied to new domain: The unconscious succeeds where the conscious fails. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 391–398.Google Scholar
Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 592–608.Google Scholar
Seth, A. K. (2008). Theories and measures of consciousness develop together. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 986–988.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R., & (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.Google Scholar
Tong, X., Lee, S. M. K., Lee, M. M. L., & Burnham, D. (2015). A tale of two features: Perception of Cantonese lexical tone and English lexical stress in Cantonese-English bilinguals. PLOS ONE, 10, e0142896.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1969). Principles of phonology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tunney, R. J. (2005). Sources of confidence judgments in implicit cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 367–373.Google Scholar
Tunney, R. J., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2001). Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 195–202.Google Scholar
Tunney, R. J., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Does opposition logic provide evidence for conscious and unconscious processes in artificial grammar learning? Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 201–218.Google Scholar
Turk-Browne, N. B., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Flexible visual statistical learning: Transfer across space and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 195–202.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2009). Implict learning in second language acquisition. In Williams, C. R. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319–355). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N., & Kuribara, C. (2008). Comparing a nativist and emergentist approach to the initial stage of SLA: An investigation of Japanese scrambling. Lingua, 118, 522–553.Google Scholar
Zellers, M., Post, B., & Williams, J. N. (2011). Implicit learning of lexical stress patterns. Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Hong Kong: International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
Ziori, E., & Dienes, Z. (2006). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge of concepts. Mind and Society, 5, 105–122.Google Scholar