Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:10:29.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First impressions: Children’s knowledge of words gained from a single exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

David K. Dickinson
David K. Dickinson*
Affiliation:
Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study
*
David K. Dickinson, Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two experiments examined factors affecting the initial phase of word learning. Four- to 11-year-olds heard new words in three presentation conditions: A conversation, a story, and paired with a definition. Overall the results indicate that children at all ages could identify the new words as “words,” were sensitive to correct usage, and could acquire a partial semantic representation from a single exposure. Older children benefited more than younger ones from explicit definitions, suggesting that metalinguistic awareness and memory strategies affect word learning. Evidence also suggests that meanings for new words are better learned if the exemplar is peripheral to previously named categories than if the word is central to a previously named category.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 359 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. Vocabulary knowledge. In Guthrie, J. T. (Ed.), Comprehension and reading. Newark, Del.: International Reading Association, 1981.Google Scholar
Appel, L. F., Cooper, R. G., McCarrell, N., Sims-Knight, J., Yussen, S. R., & Flavell, J. H.The development of the distinction between perceiving and memorizing. Child Development, 1972, 43, 1365–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, W. C. Teaching reading and language to the disadvantaged – what we have learned from field research. In Wolf, M., McQuillan, M. K., & Radwin, E. (Eds.), Thought and language/language and reading. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Educational Review, 1980.Google Scholar
Berthoud-Papandropoulou, I. An experimental study of children’s ideas about language. In Sinclair, A., Jarvella, R. J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (Eds.), The child’s conception of language. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. Basic issues in the development of word meaning. In Deutsch, M., The child’s construction of language. New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In Reese, H. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior. Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Carey, S. The child as word learner. In Bresnan, J., Miller, G., & Halle, M. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Carey, S. Semantic development, state of the art. In Geitman, L. & Wanner, E. (Eds.), Language acquisition, state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In Moore, T. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. K. The development of children’s understanding of materials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard Graduate School of Education, 1982.Google Scholar
Dickinson, D. K., The development of a material level classification system. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 04, 1984.Google Scholar
Downing, J., & Oliver, P.The child’s conception of “a word.” Reading Research Quarterly, 1973–1974, 4, 569–82.Google Scholar
Durkin, P.Teaching them to read, 4th ed.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1983.Google Scholar
Gipe, J. P.Investigating techniques for teaching word meanings. Reading Research Quarterly, 1978–1979, 14, 624–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, J. H., Jongewald, R. H., & Kail, V. Cognitive perspectives on the development of memory. In H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, 1975, 10, 57–101.Google Scholar
Hare, V. C.What’s in a word? A review of young children’s difficulties with the construct “word.” The Reading Teacher, 1984, 37, 360–65.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D., Toms-Bronowski, S., & Pittelman, S. D.An investigation of the trends in vocabulary research and the effects of prior knowledge on instructional strategies for vocabulary acquisition (Theoretical Paper no. 95). Madison, Wise.: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin, 1981.Google Scholar
Kobasigawa, A. Retrieval strategies in the development of memory. In Kail, R. V. & Hagen, J. W. (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
Levin, J. R., Pressley, M., McCormick, C. B., Miller, G. E., & Shriberg, L. K.Assessing the classroom potential of the keyword method. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71(5), 583–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maratsos, M., & Chalkley, M. A. The internal language of children’s syntax: The nature and ontogenesis of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (Ed.), Children’s language. Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Mervis, C., Catlin, J., & Rosch, E.Development of the structure of color categories. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pany, D., & Jenkins, J. R.Learning word meanings: A comparison of instructional procedures. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 1978, 1, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. The meaning of meaning. In Schwartz, S. P. (Ed.), Naming, necessity, and natural kinds. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Richards, M. M.Sorting out what’s in a word from what’s not: Evaluating Clark’s semantic features acquisition theory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979, 27, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schickedanz, J.“Hey! This book’s not working right.” Young Children. 1981, 36, 18–27.Google Scholar