Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:04:12.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elicitation of slips of the tongue from young children: A new method and preliminary observations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Bruce L. Smith*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
Bruce L. Smith, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, 2299 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208

Abstract

Although many studies of slips of the tongue have been conducted with adults, very few investigations have considered children's slips of the tongue. One reason for this is the difficulty in being able to obtain children's spontaneous slips. The present study, therefore, involved the development of a new technique for eliciting slips of the tongue from children by having them repeat short “tongue-twister” phrases. Transcriptions of the subjects' productions were made from tape recordings, and errors that they produced were examined. Durations of various segments were also measured acoustically and analyzed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baars, B. J. (1980). On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In Fromkin, V. (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Baars, B. J., & Motley, M. T. (1976). Spoonerisms as the result of conflict between word and phoneme sequences: Evidence from artificially elicited speech errors. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 467484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V., & Anderson, E. S. (1979). Spontaneous repairs: Awareness in the process of acquiring language. Stanford University Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 16, 112.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1982a). The reliability of speech error data. In Cutler, A. (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production. The Hague: Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (Ed.). (1982b). Slips of the tongue and language production. The Hague: Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G., & Reich, P. (1981). Stages in speech production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Learning to pronounce: The earliest stages of phonological development in the child. In Minifie, F. D. & Lloyd, L. L. (Eds.), Communicative and cognitive abilities – Early behavioral assessment. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A., & Farwell, C. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition: English initial consonants in the first 50 words. Language, 51, 419439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1985). Current perspectives on language and speech production: A critical overview. In Daniloff, R. (Ed.), Speech science. San Diego: College-Hill Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Slips of the tongue. Scientific American, 229, 110116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromkin, V. A. (Ed.). (1980). Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D., & Forner, L. (1980). Speech segment durations in sentence recitations by children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 157168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1970a). Spoonerisms of children. Neuropsychologia, 8, 315322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. G. (1970b). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. G. (1980). Speech errors: Retrospect and prospect. In Fromkin, V. (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. (1985). Planning and production of speech: An overview. In Proceedings of the conference on the planning and production of speech in normal and hearing-impaired individuals: A seminar in honor of Richard Silverman. ASHA Reports, 15, 1521.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F., Hutchinson, J. A., & Lasater, S. A. (1981). The production of speech: Development and dissolution of motoric and premotoric processes. In Long, J. & Baddeley, A. (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P., & Menn, L. (1979). Early strategies for the perception and production of words and sounds. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1976). Laboratory induction of verbal slips: A new method of psycholinguistic research. Communication Quarterly, 24, 2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1979). Effects of cognitive set upon laboratory induced verbal (Freudian) slips. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 421432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mowrey, R. A., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1988). Phonological constructs: Electromyographically obtained speech error evidence. Paper presented at the 115th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Seattle, WA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, J. (1981). Children's repairs. Paper presented at the Second International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In MacNeilage, P. F. (Ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1985a). Context similarity constraints on segmental speech errors: An experimental investigation of the role of word position and lexical stress. In Proceedings of the conference on the planning and production of speech in normal and hearing-impaired individuals: A seminar in honor of Richard Silverman. ASHA Reports, 15, 4349.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1985b). Segmental speech errors occur earlier in utterance planning than certain phonetic processes. Paper presented at the 109th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word-onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In Keller, E. & Gopnik, M. (Eds.), Motor and sensory processes of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Klatt, D. H. (1980). How single phoneme error data rule out two models of error generation. In Fromkin, V. (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Sigurd, B. (1973). Maximum and minimal duration of repeated syllables. Language and Speech, 16, 373395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. L. (1978). Temporal aspects of English speech production: A developmental perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 6, 3767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. L., Hillenbrand, J., Wasowicz, J., & Preston, J. (1986). Durational characteristics of vocal and subvocal speech: Implications concerning phonological organization and articulatory difficulty. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 265281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. L., Sugarman, M. D., & Long, S. H. (1983). Experimental manipulation of speaking rate for studying temporal variability in children's speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 74, 744749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 164188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkataraman, S. (1986). Spontaneous speech revision as evidence of differentiation of form and function in child language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Clark University, Worcester, MA.Google Scholar
Warren, H. (1986). Slips of the tongue in very young children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 309344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar