Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:31:34.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of second-language orthographic input on the phonological encoding of Mandarin words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

Yen-Chen Hao Open the ORCID record for Yen-Chen Hao [Opens in a new window]  and
Chung-Lin Martin Yang
Yen-Chen Hao*
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, U.S.A.
Chung-Lin Martin Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, U.S.A.
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies have yielded mixed findings regarding the effect of familiar and novel L2 graphemes on learners’ phonological encoding. The current study investigated this topic by comparing the effect of Pinyin and Chinese characters on English speakers’ Mandarin word learning. Different from previous research, this study examined both segmental and tonal encoding and compared participants from different Mandarin proficiency levels. Seventeen Advanced learners, 29 Intermediate learners, and 21 Naïve English speakers participated in a word-learning experiment in which half of the participants were exposed to the Pinyin spelling of the target words while the other half to characters. After the learning phase, they did a meaning – auditory stimulus matching task. Half of the stimuli were complete matches, while in the other half the stimulus mismatched the target either in segments or tones. The results revealed that at the Advanced level, the Character group was more accurate than the Pinyin group in rejecting tonal mismatches to the target words, while the opposite tendency was observed at the Naïve level. This study suggests that novel graphemes facilitate advanced L2 learners’ tonal encoding more than familiar graphemes, which is probably due to the unique nature of Chinese characters.

Keywords

L2 orthographyMandarin word learningdifferent L2 proficiency levelssegmental and tonal encoding
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , July 2021 , pp. 887 - 906
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassetti, B. (2006). Orthographic input and phonological representations in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. Written Language & Literacy, 9(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2007). Effects of hanyu pinyin on pronunciation in learners of Chinese as a foreign language. In Guder, A., Jiang, X. & Wan, Y. (Eds.), The cognition, learning and teaching of Chinese characters (pp. 156–179). Beijing Language and Culture University.Google Scholar
Chen, P. (1996). Toward a phonographic writing system of Chinese: A case study in writing reform. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 122(1), 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, P. (1999). Modern Chinese: history and sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikamatsu, N. (1996). The effects of L1 orthography on L2 word recognition: A study of American and Chinese learners of Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 403–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F. (1983). Writing and literacy in China. In Coulmas, F. and Ehlich, K. (Eds.), Writing in focus (pp. 239–253). Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFrancis, J. (1984). The Chinese language. University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdener, V. D., & Burnham, D. K. (2005). The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning, 55(2), 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2015). Orthography plays a limited role when learning the phonological forms of new words: The case of Spanish and English learners of novel Dutch words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P., Hayes-Harb, R., & Mitterer, H. (2008). Novel second-language words and asymmetric lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, T. L., & Suiter, T. L. (1997). Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin Chinese vowels and tones. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, Y. C. (2012). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, Y.-C. (2018). Second language perception of Mandarin vowels and tones. Language and Speech, 61(1), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes-Harb, R., & Cheng, H. W. (2016). The influence of the Pinyin and Zhuyin writing systems on the acquisition of Mandarin word forms by native English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes-Harb, R., & Hacking, J. (2015). The influence of written stress marks on native english speakers’ acquisition of Russian lexical stress contrasts. The Slavic and East European Journal, 59(1), 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J., & Barker, J. (2010). Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech, 53(3), 367–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haynes, M., & Carr, T. H. (1990). Writing system background and second language reading: a component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In Carr, T. H. (Ed.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 375–421). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kiriloff, C. (1969). On the auditory perception of tones in Mandarin. Phonetica, 20(2–4), 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koda, K. (1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of L1 orthographic structures on L2 phonological recoding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leck, K. J., Weekes, B. S., & Chen, M. J. (1995). Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers. Memory & Cognition, 23(4), 468–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, N. (2013). Implicit priming effects in Chinese word recall: The role of orthography and tones in the mental lexicon. Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing, 18(3), 1–20.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Yao, T.-c., Bi, N.-P., Ge, L., & Shi, Y. (2009). Integrated Chinese. Cheng & Tsui Company.Google ScholarPubMed
MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, L. (2016). The influence of foreign scripts on the acquisition of a second language phonological contrast. Second Language Research, 32(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, Y. (1998). Effects of first language and phonological accessibility on kanji recognition. The Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 227–248). North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pytlyk, C. (2011). Shared orthography: Do shared written symbols influence the perception of L2 sounds? The Modern Language Journal, 95(4), 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, X. S. (1989). Toward a register approach in teaching Mandarin tones. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24(3), 27–47.Google Scholar
Showalter, C. E. (2018). Impact of Cyrillic on native English speakers’ phono-lexical acquisition of Russian. Language and Speech, 61(4), 565–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Showalter, C. E. (2020). Russian phono-lexical acquisition and orthographic input: Naïve learners, experienced learners, and interventions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, C. E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2013). Unfamiliar orthographic information and second language word learning: A novel lexicon study. Second Language Research, 29(2), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Showalter, C. E., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Native English speakers learning Arabic: The influence of novel orthographic information on second language phonological acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, E., Chambless, D., & Alves, U.K. (2010). Understanding the role of orthography in the acquisition of a non-native vowel contrast. Language Sciences, 32(3), 380–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2014). Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turnage, T. W., & McGinnies, E. (1973). A cross-cultural comparison of the effects of presentation mode and meaningfulness on short-term recall. The American Journal of Psychology, 86(2), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Bosch, A., Content, A., Daelemans, W., & De Gelder, B. (1994). Measuring the complexity of writing systems. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1(3), 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., & Koda, K. (2005). Commonalities and differences in word identification skills among learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 55(1), 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87(2), 129–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–3658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young-Scholten, M. (2002). Orthographic input in L2 phonological development. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T., & Rohde, A. (Eds.), An integrated view of language development: Papers in honour of henning wode (pp. 263–279). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M., & Langer, M. (2015). The role of orthographic input in second language German: Evidence from naturalistic adult learners’ production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar