No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 5. Expanding the contexts. D. I. Slobin. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997. Pp. 339.
Review products
The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 5. Expanding the contexts. D. I. Slobin. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997. Pp. 339.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 1999
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999
References
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1979). The (re)emergence of a bilingual: Case study of a Hebrew-English speaking child. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 157-179.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Pederson, E. (1992, December). Crosslinguistic perspectives on topological spatial relationships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Brim, O. G., & Kagan, J. (1980). Constancy and change in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 373-524). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1993). Noun bias in maternal speech to one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 20, 85-100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfield, B. A. (1998). Why nouns before verbs? The view from pragmatics. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). Comments on “Developmental psycholinguistics”: A discussion of McNeill's presentation. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (Eds.), The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 85-91). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issue (pp. 1157-1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smoczynska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 595-686). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stromqvist, S., Ragnarsdottir, H., Engstrand, O., Jonsdottir, H., Lanza, E., Leiwo, M., Nordqvist, A., Peters, A., Plunkett, K., Richtoff, U., Simonsen, H. G., Toivainen, J., & Toivainen, K. (1995). The inter-Nordic study of language acquisition. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 3-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1995). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Sutton, Laurel A., Johnson, Christopher, & Shields, Ruth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480-519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 492-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PDF
41.5 KB